Leong Sze Hian

Mr Tan (not his real name) came to see me recently at the one-on-one financial counselling (every Thursday 8 pm to 10 pm) at Blk 108, Potong Pasir Ave 1.

He is 50-years old and a divorcee. He has been given one-hour visitation rights every weekend with his two children. According to Mr Tan, as his wife’s monthly income is about $6,000, he does not have to pay any monthly maintenance to her or the children.

No spouse, no children, no HDB, no CPF?

As the divorce court order was that the HDB flat which he co-owned with his ex-wife be entirely given to her, although he had contributed 60 per cent of the monies for the flat. he had nowhere to stay. The CPF which he has utilised for the flat, is also entirely given to his ex-wife. So, he approached the HDB and his Member of Parliament for help to rent a HDB flat.

As he has been unable to find a full-time job, he has been working part-time, and earns about $1,400 or less a month.

No cash to pay rental or COV, no housing loan?

The HDB informed him that as a divorcee, his housing options are to rent a room or a flat in the open market, noting that he has sufficient CPF savings to buy a flat.

The HDB’s reply to him said: “We have assessed your application and note that you have sufficient CPF savings for home ownership flat. Hence, please consider using the CPF savings for the option of buying a flat within your means.”

The cheapest room that he has been able to find is about $500, and the cheapest rental for a flat is around $1,500.

As his CPF Ordinary Account balance is only about $140,000, it is not enough to buy any resale flat in the open market. No bank will lend him a HDB housing loan, because his income is below their minimum household income requirement of about $2,000.  (Note: HDB bank loan interest rates are now at around one per cent per annum, compared to HDB loans at 2.6 per cent.)

Also, the minimum HDB housing loan that the banks require is about $100,000, and Mr Tan does not have cash to pay for the Cash-over-valuation (COV) that practically every HDB 2 or 3-room flat seller would ask for.

The cheapest HDB resale flat that he has been able to find is about $280,000, with at least $15,000 COV.

Normally, in financial counselling, for such cases, we may suggest to people like Mr Tan to try to apply to the HDB for a second HDB loan, on the grounds that no bank is willing to offer a housing loan.

However, in Mr Tan’s case, as the maximum tenure of a HDB loan is until age 65, the monthly mortgage repayment for a $140,000 HDB loan (assuming the cheapest 3-room flat at $280,000 less his $140,000 CPF) at 2.6 per cent for 15 years, is about $940.

Therefore, it may be pointless for Mr Tan to apply, because how can he afford to pay $940, when his income is less than $1,400?

In the debate in Parliament in 2002, to allow banks to offer HDB housing loans, members of the house were given the assurance that Singaporeans will not be disadvantaged by this change in the legislation.

As Mr Tan was in a ‘homeless’ situation, he was offered a room in a shared 3-room flat at Blk 29, Havelock Road, at $250 a month, under the Interim Housing Scheme.

I understand from previous tenants under the Interim Housing Scheme that when their initial temporary lease is up, which in Mr Tan’s case is 5.5 months, they may be “pressured” with a rental increase to around $400 which is the normal rate, or to move out to rent in the open market.

Of course, he can try to apply for a HDB rental flat, if he can find another single Singaporean male age 35 and above to share the flat, whose combined monthly income with him is not more than $1,500.

So, in his case, he would have to find another flat-mate who must also meet all the HDB rental eligibility criteria, and whose income is not more than $100 a month since Mr Tan’s salary is already S$1,400 a month.

By the way, I understand that the waiting list for rental flats is in the thousands, and the typical waiting time is more than a year.

According to the Department of Statistics, the number of divorces and annulments has risen to a record high of 7,386 against 26,081 marriages in 2009. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/stats/themes/people/marriages.pdf

So, given the HDB’s policies on divorcees, how many divorcees may have housing woes like Mr Tan?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

内政部援引内安法逮捕三名印尼女佣

新加坡内政部今日发文告称,本月有三名印尼籍女佣,被指有意参与伊斯兰国组织(ISIS)圣战和资助恐怖主义,遭当局援引内安法令拘留,目前调查仍在进行中。 根据文告,三名女佣分别是33岁的阿宁迪亚(Anindia Afiyantari)、36岁的列诺(Retno Hernayani)和31岁的图米妮(Turmini),在本地已工作约6至13年。 在2018年,他们接触到有关伊国组织的资讯而被激化,并参与亲ISIS的社交媒体群组或频道,接触炸弹袭击、斩首等暴力内容和视频。他们也受到诸如Aman Abdurrahman和Usman Haidar bin Seff等极端印尼传教士的影响。 阿宁迪亚和列诺曾在休假时碰面,也发展他们国外的亲军事联系,甚至拥有“志同道合”的“线上男友”。她们两位也有意到叙利亚参加圣战,例如列诺认为穆斯林应到巴勒斯坦、克省米尔等冲突地区,和“穆斯林敌人”作战。 此外,他们也涉及资助和恐怖活动有关联的海外机构。另一方面,尚有另一名印尼女佣也被逮捕接受调查,虽然她并未被激化,不过被指知情不报,完成调查后她被遣返印尼。 文告中内政部声称,新加坡仍面对持续的恐怖主义威胁。尽管在去年伊国组织已丢失大量领土,不过三名女佣仍被激化,显示伊国组织影响力仍在。…

MAS: COVID-19 will harm wages more than jobs; layoffs risk highest in retail, F&B, recreation sectors

According to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) on Tuesday (28 April),…

A confused Aljunied GRC MP?

Aljunied Town Council seem confused about purpose of “trash index”.

吐口水、怒骂快餐店职员 妇女造成公共滋扰被逮捕

日前在脸书上疯传,疑因久等外带食物的准备而发怒,在快餐店前怒骂职员“全家去死”并吐口水的妇女,上周被警方逮捕了。 上周三(4月22日)在脸书上疯传一名妇女对肯德基快餐店职员怒骂的视频,事发地点在实龙岗NEX购物中心的肯德基快餐店外。 视频中只见短发的妇女情绪激动,大声怒骂快餐店职员,之后更朝对方吐口水。 有关视频在社交媒体上疯传,甚至有网民感叹,“真是一种米养白种人”。 媒体在事发隔日,曾到该快餐店了解详情,却见已有便衣警员在店内进行调查跟进工作,受影响的女职员也协助调查并录取口供。 警方昨日就此事件发出文告,指事发时该快餐店曾报警求助,惟警员抵达时涉案妇女已经离开。 经过连番追查,宏茂桥分局的警员成功锁定了妇女身份,并于周五展开行动,以违反公共滋扰罪行将她逮捕,并探讨对方吐口水的行为是否已经触犯了病毒阻断措施的相关条例。 一旦公共滋扰罪名成立,妇女将可能被罚款2000元,而在知情下导致受害者受伤、感到危险或烦扰,惩罚或会改成长达三个月的监禁、或不超过2000元的罚款,或两者兼施。