Members of the public have observed that party flags of the People’s Action Party (PAP) are being displayed around Singapore. The question some are asking is whether such display of party flags constitute a contravention of the Parliamentary Elections Act (PEA).

Flags in Tampines Avenue 2

PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS ACT
(CHAPTER 218, SECTIONS 78, 78A AND 102)
PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS (ELECTION ADVERTISING) REGULATIONS

Permits for display of posters and banners
10. —(1) As soon as possible after nomination proceedings have closed on nomination day, the Returning Officer shall issue to every candidate or group of candidates, or to each candidate’s election agent, a permit substantially in the form set out in the Schedule authorising the display of posters and banners in any public place in the electoral division in which the candidate or (as the case may be) group of candidates seeks election.

Definitions
2. In these Regulations, unless the context otherwise requires —

“banner” means any election advertising that is a flag, bunting, ensign or standard;

“campaign period” , in relation to an election, means the period —

(a) beginning with the closure of the place of nomination on nomination day after the election is adjourned under section 34(1)(a) or 34A(1)(a), as the case may be, of the Act to enable a poll to be taken in accordance with the Act; and

(b) ending with the start of the eve of polling day of that election;

Any person who commits an offence under such regulations shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months and every offence under such regulations shall be an arrestable offence within the meaning of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (Act 15 of 2010).

Ms Rachel Zeng, a Singaporean, wrote to the Elections Department about this. The Department replied:

Dear Ms. Zeng,

Thank you for your email to the Elections Department.

The Parliamentary Elections Act governs the display of posters and banners during the campaign period. The campaign period is defined as the period beginning with the close of the nomination proceedings and ending with the start of the eve of polling day. Once the campaign period starts, the display of posters and banners must be subject to a permit that is issued by the Returning Officer.

As the campaign period has not commenced, the rules relating to the display of posters and banners under the Parliamentary Elections (Election Advertising) Regulations do not apply at this time.

The display of poster and banners outside of the campaign period is governed by other legislation.

Thank you.

Regards,

Teo Shu Huei (Ms)

Elections Department

Prime Minister’s Office

Ms Zeng has written to the Department again to seek further clarification. You can read the exchange of letters on Ms Zeng’s blog here.

Here are some pictures we have collated from various blogs (including Kent Ridge Common, Singapore Election 2011, thinkformesingapore) and some which were sent to TOC.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被没收滑板车累积逾千仓储费? 陆交局:宽限期后未领取才计日收费

电动滑板车不符规格被没收,还要支付近两千元的仓储费?对于日前网络疯传的信函,陆路交通管理局作出澄清,表示只要在“宽限期”前,用户前来索回滑板车,就不会征收仓储费。 早前,网络疯传一则信函,收信人不合格的超重(27.7公斤)电动滑板车,在7月30日被陆交局执法人员没收。根据规定,包括电动滑板车等代步工具重量不可超过20公斤。 信中提到事主须在本月15日早上10时前往陆交局调查部门报到,协助调查违规使用过重滑板车一案。但是,信中也提到,事主还需缴付150元的拖车费,以及从车辆被扣当天算起,每日21元4角的仓储费。 事主的滑板车在两个月前被没收,若要从被没收当天算起至本月15日足足77天,仓储费可以高达1千647元8角! 而假设事主无法出席周一的调查会面,当局可在不另行通知下,销毁被没收的电动滑板车,同时,还会对事主拖欠的仓储费和拖车费,采取法律行动。 信函先是在本地道路资讯脸书Raod.sg上载,随即引来民众为事主抱不平,认为滑板车被没收的惩罚已够严重,对陆交局还要向事主征收仓储费感到难以置信,也认为这形同双重惩处,有欠公平。 不过,陆交局留意到网络流传的讯息,也很快在本月16日在官方脸书专页澄清,在当局完成调查后,对于那些符合资格的用户将获得“宽限期”来领回被没收的代步工具。过了宽限期还未领取,才会被征收仓储费。 不过,当局并未说明宽限期多久。至于对被没收代步工具征收高昂拖车费,除了补贴执法时的开支,也希望起到惩戒作用,警惕民众莫触法。 根据《道路交通法》第276章657项,针对摩多、脚踏车、电动脚踏车或个人代步工具等的没收费用为150元,仓储费为21元4角钱。 在今年5月1日,《活跃通勤法案》(Active Mobility Act)开始生效。新条例规定,电动脚踏车(PAB)和个人代步工具的重量不可超过20公斤、70公分宽和摩多驱动时需限速25时速。…

5 sites for TOC GE news

Hi everyone, So, the big day is tomorrow – NOMINATION DAY. As…

PAP supporters are the 'silent majority'?

~by: Ghui~ In the article entitled “Silent Majority is truly disturbing” (Yahoo!…

我国自然生态保护巨人 苏峇拉扎心脏病逝世

本地资深自然生态顾问兼向导苏峇拉扎(Subaraj Rajathurai)于周二(10月22日)在家中因心脏病发作逝世,享年56岁。 苏峇拉扎的妻子珊拉(Shamla Jeyarajah Subaraj)昨日下午4时许在脸书上发文向亲友公开这沉痛消息。 而苏峇拉扎的其中一名儿子,萨克(Saker Subaraj)对《今日报》指出,苏峇拉扎是在家中时,因心脏病发作逝世。 其亲友于周二晚上到苏峇拉扎位于淡滨尼的住家,排队向他致敬及表示哀悼,并在公共走廊上的一本书中留下慰问与关心。 众多网民也在珊拉的帖文下留言和致哀,对于我国失去一名环保英雄而感到惋惜。同时,也有很多环保分子,包括来自邻国,马来西亚的环保分子都发文哀悼这名环保英雄的离去。 社会与家庭发展部部长李智陞也帖文致哀,对苏峇拉扎的离去感到难过,并称赞对方是“我们当地保护领域的真正巨人和先锋”。 “在谷歌成为便捷资料搜寻来源之前,苏峇拉扎是一名达人,他可以通过鸣叫声辨别鸟类,甚至知道到哪里可以找到它们。” “那是他的魔力,是他对大自然的密切理解以及美好联系,而随着他的离去,我们将会极其怀念他的一切。”…