by Jewel Philemon/ photos by May Lin


The stage was set, the players were ready and the atmosphere was electrifying. Reporters lined the sides of the stages, snapping shots and shooting videos. The core SDP supporters thronged near the stage while the public swarmed the field beside Commonwealth MRT Station, eager to hear from a party that has grown from strength to strength in the recent months. My team and I were among the thousands that swarmed the rally grounds and we were not disappointed.

The line-up of speakers for the night:

Ms. Teo Soh Lung – Lawyer, Former ISA detainee

Mr. John Tan – Social Psychologist, obtained his Masters from the University of Wisconsin

Mr. Sadasivam Veriyah – Former Teacher, served in the grassroots organizations of Ayer Rajah Constituency.

Mohd Isa Abdul Aziz – Former civil servant, current Business Development Manager for an Australian Oil and Gas company.

Mrs. Michelle Lee – Read Government and Economics at the London School of Economis, worked in the Monetary Authority of Singapore, currently an English and Literature teacher.

Mr. Alec Tok – Read Biology and Mathematics at NUS, obtained his Masters in Fine Arts at Yale University’s School of Drama. Owns his own theatre company.

Mr. James Gomez – Senior Academic at Monash University, Visiting Scholar at Keio University, founder of the NGO: Singaporeans for Democracy.

Mr. Jarrod Luo – Read Biomedical Science and Microbiology in the University of Queensland. Currently a young entrepreneur.

Mr. Tan Jee Say – Former Principal Private Secretary to then DPM, Goh Chok Tong. Currently an investment advisor, working in international banks.

Dr. Vincent Wijeysingha – Received his PhD from Sheffield University. Currently the Executive Director of the NGO: Transient Workers Count Too.

Dr. Ang Yong Guan – Served as a Psychiatrist with the Singapore Armed Forces for 17 years before retiring the rank of Colonel. He is currently in private practice.

The Influx of Foreign Labour

Among the major issues brought up was the influx of foreign labour, which the SDP proposed to tap on only if there is a real need. Mr. John Tan questioned whether there really was insufficient talent in Singapore and told the crowd that “Singaporeans have talent, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise!” Mr Mohd Isa likened the influx of foreigners to a betrayal of the older generation, which sacrificed much for a better future for future generations.

The Ruling Party’s Absolute Power

Other speakers questioned the almost absolute power which the PAP holds in parliament and over the nation. Mr. John Tan lamented that the PAP leaders had forgotten to be servants of the public, but rather, are now the masters. He added that when “times are good” the government laps up the credit, but when “times are bad”, the average Singaporean gets the blame for not working hard enough. Mr James Gomez also touched on the inequity of the PAP’s power. He quoted Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong as saying that ministers would serve two terms, and he agreed with SM Goh, urging that the PAP leaders who had been serving above and beyond the two terms should step down. Former Principal Private Secretary to SM Goh, Mr Tan Jee Say, noted that the PAP had claimed credit for the building-up of Singapore. “Gratitude is not servitude!” he responded. He added the ministers had already rewarded themselves in the form of bonuses and higher salaries. After which he thundered “You owe them nothing!” – to a deafening roar from the crowd.

Creativity Among the Speakers

Other candidates were even more creative in the speeches. Entrepreneur Jarrod Luo began his speech by telling the crowd to “vote for PAP”. He continued, saying that if citizens wanted to work all their lives, if they wanted to have no say over their families and country, if they wanted their retirement fund to only reach their children after they are dead, then by all means, vote for the PAP. Dr James Gomez, on the other hand, slammed Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan for his controversial comment on sending the elderly to Johor Bahru. Dr. Gomez stated that he was starting “Operation Johor Bahru” with the aim of sending the PAP there. Dr Gomez also voiced his belief in the passion of the citizens and a growing fear within the ruling party.

Recounting from Experience

Candidates like Ms Michelle Lee and Mr Alec Tok drew from their working experience in their speeches. Ms Lee urged against putting “all the eggs in one basket”, arguing instead that diversification was key in reducing risks. She also denounced the ruling party’s notion that the country would come to a standstill should the opposition be elected, calling it scare tactics. Ms Lee reassured voters that the civil service is such that the system would still run even if the opposition were to form the government. Mr Tok, as a man in the Arts scene, recounted the time when the Royston Tan gangster-themed flick, 15, first came out. He noted that the government wanted to heavily censor it, thus showing their ignorance of the true, prevailing issues in the film that reflected the young in Singaporean society. These issues, he said, still carry on today because of the ruling party’s ignorance.

Dr Ang Yong Guan drew from his experience as a psychiatrist, telling the crowd that he would be dealing with issues more intimate to the society. He regaled the delighted crowd in his speech in English mixed with dialect, connecting well with the people and drawing excited responses from those in the crowd. Dr Ang also lamented the “complacency at the top” of the PAP government, leading to a society that is “kiasu and kiasi”.

The Star of the Show

Perhaps the most popular candidate was Dr Vincent Wijeysingha, whose entrance was marked by a massive roar followed by the crowd chanting his name. He graciously wished the PAP the best of luck, and hoped that the best man or woman will win. He also assured the people that the SDP’s only aim and agenda was to help Singaporeans ask the hard questions in parliament, and to “step into a future with no one left behind”. “I have no other agenda than your agenda,” Dr. Wijeysingha told the euphoric crowd.

If this first SDP rally is any sign, the crowds would only swell further in the up-coming week. Such is the strength of SDP’s slate of candidates that impressed many people in the crowd tonight. It is clearly the SDP team’s message that the public is responding well to. As Dr Wijeysingha summed up for the folks in Commonwealth, “All Singaporeans deserve to be happy and fulfilled. We are not just economic digits!”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Koufu’s subsidiary offers massage service at Social Enterprise Hawker Centre to attract crowds

It was reported in the media today (‘Sign change and massage services…

After economy recovers, 10 workers should do the work of 11 or 12 – Lim Swee Say

Labour Chief advises companies on increasing productivity. Straits Times.

Joseph Schooling’s uncle shoots down claims that the Olympian relied on ‘state money’ yet failed to defend gold medal

Singapore’s swimming Olympian Joseph Schooling has been on the receiving end of…

以宪法挑战刑事诽谤控状被驳回 迪哥达代表律师将提刑事动议

因为一篇刊载在《网络公民》的文章,曾在去年12月和本社总编许渊臣一同被控刑事诽谤的35岁男子迪哥达(Daniel de Costa),针对其指控作出宪法挑战(constitutional challenge)。 不过,今日法庭驳回了迪哥达的申请。在抗辩中,控方强调迪哥斯达因破坏内阁成员名誉,被控刑事诽谤。而哥斯达诽谤的指涉对象,是内阁成员,而不是内阁本身,而法官也赞同控方的立场。 迪哥达由律师拉维(M Ravi)代表辩护。拉维曾指出,他们“将质询,在刑事法典499条下“有关人士之声誉”,依据2017年上诉庭判例,只能诠释作为“自然人”(natural persons only”),那么,文章所指的“内阁”,就不能视为任何意义上的“个人”,也和新加坡宪法23和24条一致。” 宪法第23条阐述行政机构性质;24条则关乎内阁的组成。 迪哥达在去年12月12日,在刑事法典第499条文,以及第500条文下被提控。他被指控在2018年9月4日,电邮了含诽谤内阁成员内容的文章到《网络公民》。其中提及“高层腐败”(corruption at…