By Ko Siew Huey

In an exclusive interview with The Online Citizen, four of the assentors of an opposition team that failed to file their nomination papers on time today gave their account of what happened at the Nomination Centre.

The team, comprising Ng Teck Siong, chairman of the Socialist Front [picture right], PKMS chief Nazem Suki, Lim Mie, Ng Pian Ying and Abdullah Salam came together at the eleventh hour to make a bid for the Tanjong Pagar GRC led by Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.

Up until the night before Nomination Day, the team was still trying to raise funds for the election deposit. A call was also sent out for members of the public who are residents of Tanjong Pagar GRC to volunteer themselves as proposers, seconders and assentors. These witnesses are required to accompany the candidates as they deliver the nomination papers.

Karen Teoh, 32, an IT executive and her husband Dustin Lau, 31, a manager had just arrived home from China Wednesday morning at 4:30am when they saw this urgent request for help posted on a sociopolitical website, Temasek Review. They then went door to door trying to recruit their neighbours, but that did not yield any results. They decided to show up at the Nomination Centre anyway and there they met a friend Daniel Sassoon, 36, a legal counsel and Yasser Mohamed, 33, a fishmonger.

After they arrived at about 11am, Mr Lau called Mr Ng several times, before getting through to an aide who told him that they were waiting for their other volunteers.

“I think what was happening was that they were waiting for the assentors, seconders or other people that they needed outside of the venue before they came in,” Mr Lau said. “But what that meant was that quite a few of us who were already at the venue were waiting without any clear idea of who we were supposed to go to.”

Ms Teoh recalled finally seeing the opposition team arrive at about 1130am, but the candidates stopped to answer questions from the press. She said that it was another 10 minutes before they made their way up to the Nomination Hall.

According to Mr Lau, the contingent went to the Commissioner for Oaths to prepare the necessary papers. These documents had to be checked and countersigned by the Commissioner before submission. But before that was done, the National Solidarity Party candidate for Whampoa SMC, Ken Sun, who was in the hall at that time, urged Mr Ng to hand in the papers quickly as it was nearing the deadline.

“When he rushed to hand up the form, which had not been countersigned yet, the rest of his team was there shouting at him to come back,” said Mr Lau, who lamented that they were “wasting precious minutes”.

It was during that time when Mr Ng came back to get the Commissioner’s signature that time ran out.

“All the effort that everyone else put in was wasted because they were 35 seconds late,” said Mr Yasser wistfully.

Mr Sassoon said that the whole episode appeared disorganized and haphazard: “They did not know the process, they did not know the procedure, the coming in late, the whole not organizing your team… just the whole air of chaos didn’t help.”

Ms Teoh added: “You intend to be an elected candidate and you are not clear about election rules… I’m not sure how you could represent anybody effectively in parliament.”

However, they all agreed that this particular incident should not be taken as indicative of how all opposition parties are organized. In fact, they were glad to see the presence of high caliber candidates in the current slate offered by the opposition.

With the exception of Mr Lau who voted in the 2006 General Elections, the other three who were interviewed told TOC that they have never voted. It was a common desire to ensure they and the residents at Tanjong Pagar would get the chance to exercise this right that motivated them to step up to the plate.

“I’ve never voted before and I think that’s important,” said Mr Sassoon. “I would have thought that it would have been a shame if for lack of people who actually take a step out to spare that time and show up and give their assent…for the lack of that if there was a walkover, I would have felt terribly guilty knowing that I could have been there but didn’t.”

Mr Lau said: “If a ward goes uncontested, it just feels like a free ride in. And I think that politicians should always have the mandate of the people, they should always have to fight for the right to represent people in parliament…  It’s a privilege that needs to be earned.”

Making the point that wanting the chance to vote does not mean that they were against the ruling party, Mr Yasser had this to say: “I think this point needs to be really highlighted. The fact that we are assentors does not mean that we will vote for the people we are assenting for.”

To which Ms Teoh quipped, “Having seen what I’ve seen today. Even if it had gone through, I would have voted for PAP.”

PS: TOC has made several attempts to contact Mr Ng Teck Siong but we were unable to reach him.

TOC  previously mentioned that the opposition team fielded was from the Singapore Democratic Alliance. We have since clarified that they were running as a group of independents. We apologize for the error.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chan Chun Sing: Targeted support measures required to help different business industries

Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing said that “targeted” support measures…

Extra S$3.8 billion government support for businesses and workers amid pandemic

In May, wage support for businesses in Singapore will be extended in…

Are Josephine Teo’s tears, tears of compassion or a sign that she is cracking under the pressure of public scrutiny?

Being an elected member of Government is a stressful job with high…

【选举】梁文辉:公积金本就是国民资产 应享更多自由作规划

新加坡大选2020政党论政于昨晚(1日)9点进行,邀请人民行动党三巴旺集选区候选人王乙康、前进党西海岸集选区候选人梁文辉,以及民主党马西岭-油池集选区候选人林文兴,针对如何解决就业、国民的问题发表看法。 梁文辉提及国人较为关心之课题公积金,前进党表示,应允许国人在55岁能够提出最高5万块的公积金,让国人能够享有更多财务自由和空间,以实行长远的计划。 前进党认为,只有国人的能够掌握自身财务,才有足够的资本参与新经济发展,促进经济。 对此,人民行动党也提出质问,称该政策与人民行动党如今实施的政策有何不同。前进党指所提出的政策与人民行动党最大的不同在于在政府对待国民公积金的态度上。 前进党认为,公积金原就属于国人的财务,本就应该获取更大的自由度掌控财务的流动。如今政府严格把控国人的公积金如买屋需公积金的存款,将会失去财务的流动性,让他们无法自由使用,亦是与人民行动党最大的差异。 梁文辉:先止血,保住人民的工作机会 除了公积金问题,前进党梁文辉表示也对于外来人才的涌入关注,前进党认为人民行动党强调要持续增进人口直至1千万,但如今大量的外来人才涌入新加坡,导致本国人失去良好的工作机会,也增加我国的劳动竞争力。 在提问环节,梁文辉直批政府一直否认过度的外来人才已经压迫了本地人的工作机会,因此前进党对于增至1千万人口的说法保持质疑,并认为应该严格把控人口流入。 对此,王乙康也辩称,外来人才的引入有利与弊,外来人才能够带来外国投资者的加入,同时也会提高我国的劳动竞争力,因此执政政府也一直在作出平衡。 梁文辉在最后总结也强调,前进党的政策如今强调首先必须针对外来人才的流入“止血”,因为外来人才无疑对本地人的工作机会造成很大的冲击,如今只能依靠“止血”,才有办法先保留本地人的权利。 梁文辉表示,不同于人民行动党雷声大雨点小的宣言,前进党是以民为本,秉持着同情心和多元化为人民设立政策,他也直批政府口头上宣称如今的政策对新加坡的好处,但人民却无法看见。