See Leong Kit /

( Writer’s letter to TODAY Voices was rejected for publication )

The letter “Clearing the air on pensions” ( TODAY May 14) from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) is just a first step on transparency and accountability expected by our taxpayers and voters.

Thinking Singaporeans do not expect our politicians and senior bureaucrats to live on “fresh air and love of the people”.  They will readily support reasonable and adequate remunerations for such public servants.

However, since 1994, there has been never-ending public consternation over  the million-dollar remunerations of our political office holders.

As such remunerations are paid out of public funds, our taxpayers certainly have the right to know the true facts.  Lack of transparency on this rightful public concern will only aggravate the voter disenchantment that is so evident in the recent general elections.

In the private sector, to promote good corporate governance, the Singapore Stock Exchange requires public-listed companies to disclose the Total Annual Pay packages within salary bands for their CEOs and other senior staff.

Our public sector should also follow suit as an act of good political governance.

For 2010, the reported Total Annual Pay packages of the CEOs of Temasek-linked companies such as DBS, CapitaLand, Semcorp Marine and Keppel Corp ranged from $6.7m to $11.5m.

In 2007, CapitaLand CEO Liew Mun Leong, a former civil servant, received a whopping Total Annual Pay of $20.5m, which led to a public outcry.

For our political office holders, their disclosed Basic Annual Pay are currently $2m for Minister, $3m for Deputy Prime Minister and $3.4m each for the former Minister Mentor and the Senior Minister.  The PM himself receives S$3.76m*. However, their undisclosed Total Annual Pay packages which allegedly comprise such items as basic pay, mid-year bonus, year-end bonus, GDP bonus, Performance bonus have been an endless source of speculation on the Internet.

Taking the cue from the CEO pay packages of Temasek-linked companies, some netizens  deduced that  the Total Annual Pay packages of Temasek Holdings CEO Ho Ching and our Cabinet ministers would likely be in the two-digit millions and upwards of $15m.  But this could mean anything between $15m and $99m.

Thus, the onus is now on the PMO to issue a credible public statement to dispel once and for all the widespread Internet rumours and misinformation surrounding ministers’ Pay.  Additionally, will the postponed third round of their salary increases proceed as planned or be permanently scrapped?

 

* 3:17pm: Earlier today the sentence read “The PM himself receives S$3.4m.” We have just corrected the error, as the PM actually receives S$3.76m.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Yip Pin Xiu wins gold in the women’s 100m backstroke S2 final at Tokyo Paralympic

Singapore’s Yip Pin Xiu won gold in the women’s 100m backstroke S2…

国会三读通过刑事法修法 加重偷窥偷拍刑罚

国会在昨日(5月6日),三读通过刑事法典修法,偷窥或偷拍者日后被定罪,将被罚监禁最长两年,比非礼罪的监禁刑罚还多一倍。 内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根在法案二读时强调,当局早在国大宿舍偷拍事件前,就已意识到,现有法律不足以应付偷窥等罪行,因此修法也纳入这类犯罪趋势的考量。 上述修法旨在更好地保护弱势群体和受害者。其中弱势受害者,被定义为外籍女佣、未满14岁青少、弱智或残障,以及无法自我保护的弱势者。 另一组弱势受害者则指与犯罪者有亲密关系(intimate relationship)或密切关系者(close- relationship)。 如果受害者属弱势群体,罪加一等,是一般最高刑罚的两倍。若蓄意导致弱势受害者重伤甚至死亡,被告可面对最长20年的监禁。 尚穆根表示,只要涉及弱势受害者,警方就能介入逮捕嫌犯,即时有关罪名原本不允许警方直接行使逮捕权。 法案也加入一项假定条文,被告只要录影或偷窥他人私密行为或私处,就属未经受害者同意的行为,被告需负起举证责任,向法庭证明他们是经得允许的情况下进行录影或窥视,才可能脱罪。 至于动手脚安装针孔摄影机偷拍,也属刑事罪。 过去三年,大学37宗偷拍案涉弱势受害者 针对如国大偷拍事件的案例,目前的刑法称之为非礼罪(insult…

PM Lee visits girl who had her right hand crushed

Post by Lee Hsien Loong. Injured 14-year-old Tan Li Xuan, who had…

Face to Face 2: Presidential Forum video Part 2

Photos by: Terry Xu and Shawn Danker/ Note from the TOC team:…