Deborah Choo/

Mdm Choi Lim Siew, 65, was diagnosed in 2009 with a rare blood cancer called multiple myeloma.  All the doctors she went to were perplexed over her condition and did not know how to treat her. It took almost nine months of going from polyclinic doctors to bone specialists to a blood specialist before they realized an abnormality in her blood count. Further tests then confirmed she had blood cancer. By then it was too late. Mdm Choi was already in the last stage of myeloma.

Singapore General Hospital is where Mdm Choi receives her cancer treatment now.

The hospital bills and consultation fees, especially for specialist doctors and medical reports, exhausted her savings. Unfortunately, that was only the beginning. There is no cure for her condition, and the treatments she is going through now only serve to prolong her life.

Mdm Choi has thought of giving up because the heavy medical bills were too much to bear. “I told the doctor frankly to give me the worst possible scenario if I stop treatment. He said the bones will all start to crack, I will feel pain and at most I have six months more to live,” she said.

She was told that cancer treatments are not subsidized by the government and that she was also unable to use her Medisave. After much haggling with the authorities , and with her doctor’s help, she was later allowed to tap into her Medisave which had about $29,000 then. But this was drained rapidly by the costs of the pills (about S$500 per pill) and the chemotherapy sessions (S$1,000 per treatment).

“My medicine is so expensive that the nurse doesn’t even dare to open it for me to partake. She will pass it to me to open it myself,” she said.

Mdm Choi is now tapping into her son’s Medisave account to pay for her treatment.  On the day we first met her, she had just been out of hospital for a round of chemotherapy. This was her third course of treatment and had cost about $7,000. As Medisave has a cap limit per day of $450, she could not afford to pay the entire bill. She now has about $5,000 outstanding which she needs to pay for. She has to complete another three more courses, which translates into approximately $21,000  in costs.

“I really don’t know where to find the money,” Mdm Choi said. But more importantly, she asked, “Why are cancer treatments not subsidized by the government?”

According to the Ministry of Health statistics, diseases such as cancer, ischaemic heart disease and pneumonia together accounted for approximnately 60% of the total causes of death in 2009 alone.

About three weeks ago, she sent in an appeal for financial assistance to the Singapore Leukemia Foundation. She is currently awaiting the foundation’s reply.

Here are her recent five pages medical bill (this is republished with Mdm Choi’s consent):

page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5

 

During the same period in 2009, Mdm Choi’s husband Mr Cheong had a fall at home one day. He was then rushed to the hospital and told that he had to undergo surgery. He is 73.

Mr Cheong had a heart attack in his early thirties and has had to be on medication since.

When he asked the hospital for an estimate of the cost of the surgery, he was told that it would only cost him about $5,000. Thinking that he could tap into his Medisave (since he was ineligible for Medishield due to his heart condition), he went ahead with the operation. He had about $26,000 in his Medisave account. After the surgery, however, the bills came up to $31,000. The final bill, after subsidies, was $12,000. He was then told that he cannot use his Medisave to pay the bills.  “We almost died when we saw the bill,” said Mdm Choi.

In November 2009, he appealed twice to his MP Dr Lily Neo. “She saw my folder of bills and said I was already given subsidies,” he said. The meeting lasted only 15 minutes before Dr Neo said she will send a letter to the Central Provident Funds (CPF) board and the Singapore General Hospital (SGH).

 

*Note: Personal details are omitted to protect the interviewee's privacy.

On 15 December 2009 came a reply from the CPF board. The letter said, “We regret that we are unable to accede to your request to use more Medisave to pay your outstanding hospital bill at SGH as the maximum has already been withdrawn…If you have difficulties in settling your hospitalization expenses, you may wish to approach SGH Business Office …  for consideration of financial assistance or to work out an affordable payment plan.”

Slightly more than a month ago, Mr Cheong applied for financial assistance at SGH. Instead he was referred to the Medical Social Services of the National Heart Centre.

During this period, demand for payment of his bills were frequently received from a credit collection company on behalf of SGH.

“They’re like a licensed loan shark,” Mdm Choi chipped in. Mr Cheong kept holding them off by telling them he is currently appealing to his MP.

He turned to his insurance company but his claims were rejected.

Lucky for Mr Cheong, his ex-boss (he used to work in Public Utilities Board for 44 years),  who was also an ex-MP, learnt of his condition. He then made a personal call to Dr Neo after Chinese New Year in 2010 on behalf of Mr Cheong. That was when things started improving. Soon after, he received a letter from the CPF allowing him to pay off half his bills through his Medisave. At the same time, SGH also sent him a letter authorizing him to pay off his remaining payment with 23 installments of about $400 a month. “I only receive $300 a month from annuity! How am I supposed to pay $400? I don’t need to eat already,” Mr Cheong said.

He repeatedly appealed to SGH again and finally the hospital relented. It allowed him to pay $150 a month for 29 installments, which means he will have to keep paying until 2013.

Four months ago, Mr Cheong had another fall and was advised by his doctor to go for another surgery. However, he refused as he cannot afford the costs given his current predicament. He can hardly survive on the little money he has now. All he can do for now is to go for regular check-ups.

Mr Cheong also suffers from diabetes, high blood pressure and has a deteriorating eye condition. “Every week, it’s like I have to go for at least one check up,” he said.

Mdm Choi has also previously written in to The Straits Times explaining their predicament but her letter was not published.

Mr Cheong asked, “Why can’t I use Medisave when it’s my own money?”

“We’re not blaming the government for anything. We just want to get our answers,” Mdm Choisaid. 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

总理起诉许渊臣 林鼎将担任辩护律师

针对新加坡总理李显龙起诉本社总编许渊臣,林鼎将担任后者的辩护律师。预计聆讯将在下月30日进行至12月4日。 2019年9月5日,本社总编收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 诉状中,对本社英语站发表《总理夫人何晶奇怪地分享了一篇与家人断绝关系》的文章,总理提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 去年9月27日,许渊臣提呈答辩书。许渊臣认为内容是复述李总理弟妹的话,并不具诽谤性质。 林鼎在今日在脸书公开讲作为本社总编辩护律师的消息,指出他赞赏许渊臣和《网络公民》作为独立媒体的工作,也强调替代媒体作为民主制度中第四权的重要。正是这类替代媒体能确保有权势和社会精英能继续接受问责。 许渊臣则表示,由于面对许多法律技术层面的挑战,不得已而寻求律师id协助。他也担忧总理的律师在审讯时挑起法律上的失误,为此需要有一名代表。此前,许一直在审讯中为自己辩护。 除了许渊臣,林鼎律师也代表时评人梁实轩,在面对总理的诽谤诉讼中辩护。 I…

Progress Singapore Party to move inaugural Speaker Series talk to Concorde Hotel, citing need for larger venue due to overwhelming response

Progress Singapore Party (PSP) announced on Wed (4 Sep) a change of…

有好多星期的“不眠之夜” 梁文辉:维文理应更早厘清“合力追踪”数据事宜

周一(4日),内政部政务部长陈国明在国会答复议员质询时表示,刑事诉讼法赋予警方权力,可获取任何数据,包括合力追踪便携器的数据,随即引发一阵议论。 事缘在去年6月5日,外交部长维文曾在国会表示,合力追踪数据仅限于防疫追踪用途。在去年6月9日,在抗疫跨部门工作小组的记者会上,也回应坊间对于“合力追踪”侵犯隐私的质疑,解释这款配备仅记录的蓝牙近距离接触数据,无全球定位芯片、也不具备互联网通信功能,为此不可能未经用户许可就外泄。 内政部兼律政部长尚穆根与维文,则在本月5日在国会作出进一步澄清,指警方只有在追踪重大罪案时,才能动用“合力追踪”数据。 主管智慧国计划的维文坦言,在得知刑事诉讼法也适用于“合力追踪”数据,确实曾“睡不着觉”,“我在想:是否要说服我的内阁同僚修法?但经过深思熟虑、讨论和质询了朝野内外人士的意见,我想目前这样我们做得很好,能确保新加坡的安全,也能应对当前危机。” 新加坡前进党非选区议员梁文辉,此前也在国会针对此课题质询维文。他对此事发表后续评论,“先礼后兵”强调本身仍持续相信部长维文和政府的诚信,也无理由去怀疑部长维文的说法。 后者称本身未想到刑事诉讼法(Criminal Procedure Code),可用于索取“合力追踪”数据,并认为应坦诚澄清,因此感谢国会同僚提出这道询问。 但梁文辉也指出,若维文实属“真诚”疏忽(‘genuine’ oversight),那么他应更早和直接地公开这资讯。“他有“好多个星期”的不眠之夜、去思索或询问他的内阁同僚,以改善法令。” 不过,与其主动向公众坦诚,似乎要等到内政部政务部长答复国会议员提问,维文才在隔日出来澄清。 透明度要全面、及时…

A Charity, but why has Singapore Environment Council not posted its financial returns on its website for public scrutiny?

As a registered charity with an Institution of Public Character (IPC), the…