by: Ravi Philemon/

A friend recently asked, “Why? Why does Chiam deserve a tribute dinner from any of us who are not residents of Potong Pasir? What interests of non-Potong Pasir residents has he advanced all these years?” Another said that TOC should not be in the business of throwing “lavish dinners” for politicians.

I think like these friends, many of our readers too may be asking why TOC is holding this appreciation dinner for Mr Chiam See Tong.

A Russian proverb says, “You live as long as you are remembered”.

In the aftermath of General Election 2011, the news was all about how the election was a watershed one, about the People’s Action Party and the Workers’ Party.

The bravery of the man who chose to come out of his comfort zone of Potong Pasir, to give then Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng a fight of his life and losing by a mere 7 per cent was quickly being forgotten.

There was a chance that the legacy of the man who first entered politics in 1976 when he contested as an independent candidate in Cairnhill constituency, which he lost; the legacy of the man – Chiam See Tong -who went on to contest in Potong Pasir – losing twice, before winning with 60.3 per cent of the vote against Mah Bow Tan in 1984, may be forgotten.

This to me is significant, especially since Mr Chiam’s electoral victories took place in an era where defamation suits and ISA arrests to silence the opposition views, were common.

To be in opposition politics for 27 years against these odds, and to be speaking up not just for the residents of Potong Pasir, but also for all Singaporeans, is no easy feat.

So, TOC thought, “Yes, we should appreciate this man while he is still here with us”.

I remember first meeting Mr Chiam in one of his Meet-the-People Session in Potong Pasir in early 2009. Mr Chiam appeared quite frail from the stroke which he suffered in 2008. I introduced myself and was engaged in a conversation with him, when he saw a resident waiting to see him from a corner of his eye. He asked me if I would wait to continue the conversation, and called this constituent by name and started enquiring how everyone in her family were.

Mr Chiam did not have her case file (they were held by the helpers helping in his MPS), but he knew who his constituent was. How many MPs can do this? Even more when they are recovering after being stricken by stroke?

I was of course, very surprised.

I also remember another incident vividly. I was the VIP Liaison at TOC’s Face to Face event and was assisting Mr Chiam in the waiting room, before the event started. As we were leaving the waiting room to meet the press, Mr Chiam insisted that he did not want my (or anyone else’s) assistance. He said that the people must know that he is fit and ready to fight another round.

Such doggedness!

For me, I think I will always remember Mr Chiam See Tong as a man with dogged determination.

Dogged determination which made him fight on, only to win in the fourth attempt in Potong Pasir. Dogged determination which made him continue to keep Potong Pasir a beacon of hope of opposition politics in Singapore. Dogged determination, which made him come back after suffering from the stroke. And dogged determination, which makes him say that he will come back to fight another day in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC.

Thank you Mr Chiam!

Have you bought the tickets for “Thank you, Mr Chiam!” An appreciation dinner organised by TOC?

There will also be an auction at TOC’s appreciation dinner, of limited edition portraits of Mr Chiam See Tong.

 

Starting bids are:
Black (1 set of two 24×24 inch canvas) – $600
Yellow (24×24 inch canvas) – $500
Red (18×18 inch canvas) – $300
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

前女佣被指偷窃终得平反 法官质疑廖文良一家指控存“不当意图”

46岁的印尼籍女佣巴蒂·莉雅妮(Parti Liyani),为樟宜机场集团主席廖文良工作近九年,不幸在2016年10月28日被裁退。 巴蒂被裁后,当天就返回印尼。不料雇主廖文良父子却在两日后报警,指控巴蒂偷走5万元财物,包括价值2.5万元名表、Prada的名牌包和Gucci墨镜等。 这也导致巴蒂在2016年12月返回新加坡时,在樟宜机场被逮捕。2019年3月,巴蒂被国家法院判罪名成立,并判坐牢两年两个月,前者选择上诉。 根据2018年8月的《新明日报》报导,当时廖文良在法庭供证时,甚至指出家里东西一再不见,家里当时只有他、妻子以及女佣,如果东西不是他和妻子偷的,女佣嫌疑最大。 廖文良声称不想继续冒险,所以妻子才辞退了巴蒂。廖自称除非出问题,否则自己不轻易开除员工,也指秘书和司机都已和他共事多年。 然而,今年9月4日,高庭推翻了国家法院的判决,改判巴蒂无罪。高庭法官陈成安甚至表示,有理由相信廖文良为了阻止女佣到人力部投诉,所以廖家父子先发制人,突然解雇女佣,不让后者有时间去人力部,并指控后者偷窃。 廖启龙自称有“穿女装习惯”? 至于廖文良儿子廖启龙,还被法官点名“不诚实的控方证人”,例如,廖启龙称失窃的女性衣物属于他的,而不是女佣的,甚至自称有穿女性衣物的习惯,说辞令人难以相信。 根据《联合早报》报导,所谓“赃物”移交警局过程也存在疑点,特别是廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子,并报警后,警方未立即取走证物。五周后女佣被捕,警方才上门再拍摄证物照片,廖家人才把失窃物品放回箱里。法官认为整个过程都出现混肴,甚至无法凭这些证物定罪巴蒂。 随着巴蒂上诉得直,使得包括总检察署、人力部和警方等各造,才表示将研讨是否采取进一步行动。 巴蒂申诉被非法调他处工作…

SAMH abruptly withdrew from Bali plenary meeting due to Ministry of Foreign Affairs advisory on Lombok

In a Facebook post dated 26 Aug, lawyer M Ravi has expressed…

New appointments of Permanent Secretary in various ministries

Public Service Division (PSD) has announced the appointment of three civil servants…