Leong Sze Hian/

Former Health Minister and current Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan

 

I refer to the ST reports “PAP appoints Khaw Boon Wan as Party Chairman” (ST, Jun 2) and “Gan to focus on three key health areas” (ST, May 31).

3 Key Areas

With reference to the three key health areas of infrastructure, cost and ageing policies cited by the new Health Minister, I would like to make the following remarks: –

 

“On the first issue, the Health Minister (Gan Kim Yong) said it was necessary to take stock of demographic trends adding “we will need to plan ahead not only in terms of physical capacity but also in terms of human resource development, to ensure sufficient supply of healthcare professionals and workers”.

Is the new Minister saying that his predecessor did not plan at all, since the increase in the total number of hospital beds was zero over the last 10 years or so, and that this is vis-à-vis a one million increase in the population and also promoting the increase in medical tourists to 850,000?

As to “human resource development”, when I went to a polyclinic and hospital recently, the receptionist, nurse, X-ray technician and doctor, were all foreigners, and I had some difficulty understanding their accent. I have heard that some non- English speaking Singaporeans have had some difficulty communicating with foreign healthcare professionals.

Since the former Health Minister did not tell us, can the new Minister tell us the proportion and breakdown of healthcare professionals like doctors, nurses, etc., who are non-Singaporeans?

I understand that the national Medical School is acutely short of funding because of insufficient financial support from the Government.

Would the Minister like to comment on this?

Depleted Medisave Accounts

“The problem is especially real for retirees with limited cash savings and middle- income families with elderly parents and sick children to look after”.

Can the Minister tell us how many Singaporeans age 60 and above, have nothing or less than $1,000 in their Medisave Account?

How many do not have any form of medical insurance?

How many children who are sick or without an adverse health history, are not covered by any medical insurance, like Medishield?

In this regard, I understand that Singapore is probably the only country in the world that excludes children’s congenital conditions from the national health insurance scheme (Medishield in the case of Singapore).

Passing the Baton

Mr. Khaw wrote about “unfinished business” in his last blog entry as Health Minister and paying tribute to Mr. Khaw, Mr Gan said: “My first impression is that Minister Khaw has done a great job to improve the health-care framework … The quality of healthcare in Singapore is something we can all be proud of”.

Current Health Minister Gan Kim Yong

This in my view, may go down in the annals of healthcare history as perhaps the greatest understatement by a Minister when we look back in the future on the so called “transformation” in our history – something which we may really be very proud of if and when the Health Minister fixes all the problems that he has inherited.

Healthcare Outcomes

The former Health Minister’s consistent rhetoric has been that our 3Ms (Medisave, Medishield, Medifund) system is affordable, efficient and admired by other countries. What has this left us with, in terms of outcomes for healthcare?

• About 21 per cent of Singaporeans who sought financial counselling from Credit Counselling Singapore had to do so due to medical costs;

• The zero increase in total hospital beds over the last decade in relation to the surge in population;

• A 99 per cent unsuccessful rate (or 1% success rate) for patients’ applications to downgrade to lower classes of hospital rooms;

• The last available disclosed statistic from the Chairperson of the Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) on Health was that 750,000 people had no form of medical insurance;

• Public healthcare spending is only about two per cent of GDP, which is one of the lowest, if not the lowest in the world;

• Public hospitals’ average hospitalisation bills have increased by as much as double over the last four years;

• $86 million of Medifund surpluses were transferred to the protected reserves, instead of allowing Medifund usage for the needy at Polyclinic out-patient treatment;

• More and more non-subsidised drugs and treatments and a refusal to disclose standardised drugs list like most countries do;

• A refusal to disclose Medifund applications success rates on a patients’ rejected basis, instead of total applications basis;

• A refusal to make public the criteria for approving Medifund applications;

• Longer and longer waiting times for practically all types of subsidised medical treatment – up to years for dental;

• Continuing to shift the burden of healthcare financing ratio of public/private spending from 75:25 to about 50:50 now;

• About half of Medisave account holders’ Medisave being consumed for other family members – thus creating the likely future problem of insufficient funding for account holders as they grow older; and

• No transparency in the funding to public hospitals vis-à-vis the subsidies shown in patients ‘ hospital bills.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

指四在野党结盟如“抱团防沉船” 前进党:陈仲熙言论不代表该党立场

据《海峡时报》报导指其中一名新加坡前进党要员,揶揄近期四在野党有意组盟,实则为“抱团防沉船”;不过前进党随即澄清,有关该党中委陈仲熙的个人言论,不代表前进党秘书长陈清木医生以及其他中委的立场。 该党在今日(15日)发文指出:“我们诚挚敬仰其他在野党和领袖们多年来的付出及牺牲,为更美好家国而努力。” 前进党称,陈仲熙是该党创党中委之一,他是在与一群友人群组闲聊时,以玩笑方式说出上述言论,群组中成员也包括拟议组盟的在野党人士在内。不过这番言论却被广传并被主流媒体报导。 陈如斯则在接受《海时》采访时重申,那仅是他的个人意见。 至于陈清木在早前被媒体追问结盟一事,后者仅表示尽管获得邀请,不过目前仍先专注扎稳前进党团队的脚跟。 他坦言群众都希望看到在野党团结一致,不过具体以什么形式组成联盟,他仍保持开放态度。 “我仍在组建我的团队,他们可以做他们想做的… 但我们在看更大的格局。” 在早前本社英语站的一篇政治文章,也引述陈仲熙观点,后者认为就形同“四位船长,在各自将沉之小艇–甚至不算是船!他们互相握紧手避免溺水”。 不过,有关文章也质疑拟议中的联盟是否具备效益,以及如何让各盟党都能透过组盟获得优势。 与此同时,尽管组盟可能是为了避免三、四角战的不利局面,不过各党需思考是否能派出能获得群众支持的候选人、人力物力等等。 此前,同样是《海峡时报》报导,指国人为先党(Singaporean…

Singaporeans call for social justice to be part of general election

A group of Singaporeans have come together to start a campaign to…

男子带脚车乘地铁还对乘客爆粗 SMRT报警

男子把脚踏车带进地铁车厢,还高挂在扶手栏杆上,态度嚣张对其他乘客爆粗! 网民Nurul Hanisha昨日在社交媒体脸书分享短片,上述男子戴着紫色帽子、身穿灰色T恤,不仅无视其他乘客把脚车悬挂扶手栏杆,还爆粗口骂其他乘客。 许多网友谴责这名男子行为举止像流氓,好像整个车厢都是他的,脚车爱怎么摆都不用顾及其他乘客的便利。网友也质问男子是如何成功进站,难道地铁公司没有阻止? 地铁公司SMRT则在脸书回复词时,指出事件发生在本月15日傍晚7时许。当时兀兰地铁站的职员已试图阻止这名男子进站,他携带着非折叠式脚踏车。 “这名男乘客不肯合作,硬硬要进站,登上北向的列车。随后在裕廊东站转乘西行列车,在傍晚7点50分离开先驱地铁站。” SMRT公司声称已确认乘客身份并报警,也强调为了其他乘客的安全和舒适着想,提醒民众若携带折叠式脚踏车或个人代步工具时上地铁和巴士,需遵守规则。 但似乎网民仍质疑,何以地铁保安无法阻止男子进站,或是未立即报警请警员到场处理。  

消防立管故障无法救火! 民防部队警告碧山-大巴窑市镇会

大巴窑上月一座组屋发生火灾,民防部队到场后欲救火,却发现消防立管(riser)没水。随后,当局也发出通知书,警告碧山-大巴窑市镇会,市镇会也随之进行纠正。 上月位于大巴窑1A巷的The Peak@Toa Payoh私人组屋第138C座组屋,于凌晨2点55分发生火患,火势吞噬20楼和21楼的两个单位,导致200人紧急逃离现场,三人送院治疗。 事后,有居民向当局投诉,指当天救火的用水量较小,没有使用水量更大的消防立管,而且当局又派人来检查各楼层的立管,因此质疑消防立管是否无法操作,影响救火。 对此,民防部队解释,当天到场后发现立管故障,因此消防人员改使用水管(hose reels),及时将火势扑灭。 当局也在本月4日,向碧山-大巴窑市镇会发出火患危险通知书(Fire Hazard Abatement Notice)。经市镇会纠正后,如今消防立管已可正常操作。民防部队正针对消防立管故障一事进行调查,必要时将对相关人士采取执法行动。 去年武吉巴督火患 …