Kelvin Oh /

Currently 15 of age, I’m a student of a neighbourhood school. After reading what others had to say, I decided to contribute my own views and opinions.

I was glancing through twitter when I saw the open letter to the Education Minister, and even though I’m a year younger, I could relate to her problems. I also read this article, written by a senior of mine who encouraged me to put up my views as well. I probably can’t write as well as the former two, but I’ll try.

I have to agree with this, that our education system has not encouraged us to be curious. Curiosity accelerates the human race. If different inventors or great thinkers of the past did not ask themselves “Why can’t I do this?” we would probably still be living in the past. We are taught in a way whereby we should only question and not ask.

Older generations often say we are a lucky ones, who get good books, good facilities and a good learning environment. But there is a difference somehow, the difference being a motivational force. The older generation sought knowledge, they studied because they were curious. On the other hand, we, as the Y Generation, study for a different reason. We study to overcome exams, get a good job and lead a good life.

So, what is the purpose of education? To educate, or to get over with exams? And I thought exams are indicators to measure how good you are.

I have always been taught by people around me that “what is important is not the results, but the process”. But this line, sadly, does not seem to apply to education.

Is the education system too competitive? For average students, we have class tests at least once every 2 weeks. We have vast chapters to cram into our brains and we have exams every term. Furthermore, for teachers to ensure every piece of homework is done, they make our homework graded assignments, adding it in to our exam component. Graded assignments are practically useless because of the low percentage it has for our report book . For example, I may have got full marks for all my graded assignments, but an average of 50 marks for my exam scripts – my combined score will probably be about 51%. So what’s the use of calling them graded assignments, when they hold so little weight?

I believe all students and youth alike have their own thoughts and aspirations. I want to be a lawyer. But like what Vivien mentioned in “Is the current Singapore the Singapore we really want”, what’s the point of logarithms when you probably don’t need it in the future? Are we actually learning for the sake of O Levels? So what’s the point of education, when education is meant to teach you to prepare for exams and not for the sake of knowledge?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

本地退休高管踢爆 为省成本银行后台作业外包发展中国家!

8月13日,数家银行声称有强大本地人核心雇员团队,随即遭到一名退休银行家打脸,直言一些“大型、老牌外籍银行”,倾向雇用外籍人士、排挤新加坡人才,已是业界熟知之事。 今日(19日)再有一名退休银行高管Roy Lim Cheow Kwan,到《海峡时报》撰文,直接踢爆银行业界的一些不健康风气,包括过去20年,许多银行把后台作业,外包给发展中国家,以节省成本! 他说尽管可以理解银行的这些政策,但同样也令他感到不安,特别是这形同让本地年轻银行雇员,失去对银行技能的基本了解和掌握。这甚至意味着,将来新加坡将逐渐变得需依赖其他国家,才能维持金融中心的运作。 “万一外包国家局势动荡如何是好?” 他警告:“如果这些国家局势面对动荡,都可能影响本地银行的日常运作。” Roy Lim直言,我们的理工学院毕业生,就足以胜任这些后台工作,也让他们能在本地发展自己的职涯。 这些关键业务由自家掌控,才能确保银行能更好地掌控全盘交易,乃至能及时侦测到欺诈性交易。 他举例,例如提货单(bills…

感谢英女皇御用大状彭立克建言 李绳武分享仍遭新加坡政府起诉

“朋友很常问我,即便是到现在,新加坡政府是否还在起诉我。答案是,是的。我才刚提呈我的书面证词。” 李显扬之子、也是哈佛经济教授的李绳武,今日(25日)在脸书分享近况,他的朋友关心,他此前的脸书贴文,被指涉嫌藐视法庭一案,是否还遭到新加坡政府起诉。对此李绳武证实,他刚提交书面证词。 回顾2017年7月15日,身为建国总理李光耀孙子、也是现任总理李显龙侄子的李绳武,在脸书贴文批评我国政府“好诉讼”(ligitious),法庭制度“温顺”(pliant),被总检察署指控藐视法庭。 他透露,过去两年,他的法律团队都得到英女皇御用律师彭力克(David Pannick,也是知名宪法专家)的建言,他感谢后者的引导和协助,“即便他仍努力赢取英国最具有里程碑意义的宪法诉讼之中。” 陈清木也曾针对总统选举议题,请教彭力克 据了解,彭力克男爵此人非同小可,在英国乃至国际都是知名的法律人士,最擅长公民法、公民自由和人权,也曾多次参与香港的法律诉讼。 除了李绳武,实际上前总统候选人、也是现任前进党秘书长的陈清木,曾在2017年请教彭力克,询问他有关民选总统是否从黄金辉算起。对此,彭力克提出不同意总检察长的建议,并指出有关民选总统选举(修正) 法令第22节条文是不符合宪法的。 今年四月,由大法官梅达顺、上诉庭法官郑永光和庄泓翔所组成的三司,裁定驳回李绳武的上诉,总检察署获准在美国递交法律文件给李绳武。 当时,李绳武对上诉裁决表达失望,不过也指出,总检察署仍要拿出足够理据证明,他的私人脸书贴文何种程度上贬砥了新加坡的司法机构。

Train breakdowns: Is dishonesty really the best policy?

Another train breakdown, another delay, another inaccurate estimate given. Please. Why can’t…

Zero Singaporeans to benefit from Manpower Minister's annual job growth of 25,000 to 40,000 forecast?

Singaporeans to expect annual job growth of 25,000 to 40,000? I refer…