by: Neo Swee Lin/


In 1987, 22 people were detained without trial under the ISA under Operation Spectrum – “a security operation which saw 22 young Roman Catholic church and social activists and professionals detained, without trial, under the internal security law, accused of being members of an alleged Marxist conspiracy bent on subverting the PAP-ruled government by force, and replacing it with a Marxist state” (see HERE).

I just want some soft words for those who were so unjustly mistreated in 1987, and the Presidential candidates should give me some peace, in that if you’re elected, would you be protecting us the citizens if something like this happened again?

Is it too much to expect? The government is never going to apologize or admit any wrong. Could the candidates now as part of their campaign for Presidency give the people some kind of simple show of compassion and hope?

An excerpt from much anticipated The Online Citizen interview with Dr Tan Cheng Bock reads:

“When asked whether he still feels the ‘Marxist conspirators’ are guilty, Dr Tan says with a tone of sincerity, “I really feel they are innocent. They are all social workers and they meant well but unfortunately…(trails off)”
He adds, “I saw the ex-detainees and I really do feel for them. But at that time I believed the information that was given to me.”

Unfortunately the video interview does not show this at all. In fact what Dr Tan says in the video is:

“this is a very sensitive subject… ” and “when all this appeared on the net, I was told to be very careful”

TOLD??? TOLD BY WHOM?

I posted a question on Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s Facebook page, I asked:

“Dr Tan, with respect, there is a question that is burning in my mind and I guess I should just ask it. Knowing what you know today, would you have acted differently with regard to the so-called Marxist Conspirators of 1987? would you heed David Marshall’s call to “save the innocent Teo Soh Lung & Kevin De Souza?”

My question was ignored and eventually deleted from his page. It makes me want to ignore and delete him too.

Friends, I’m just trying to figure out who to vote as our next President.

Someone said on my FB, “you mean you even considered voting for Dr Tony Tan?” Yes, actually I did. But not now. Not after watching him speak on videos – he is so terribly uninspiring and not as sweet as he looks in pictures. Moving pictures tell a different story, he scares the hell out of me actually. And certainly not after the shameless plugging of the Straits Times, beginning with the endorsement by our Prime Minister.

Now I am looking for an alternative. And to everyone’s surprise, Tan Jee Say has got his Certificate of Entitlement. Also I’m not sure if its the savvy “I know how to campaign” Dr Tan Cheng Bock yet.

My dad met Dr Tan Cheng Bock in church few weeks ago, and said he was going to vote for him. But he has now changed his mind, on his own accord!

Teo Soh Lung was right. Change has begun.

Four eligibles for the Elected Presidency. Who would’ve thought we would see the day. People are saying so and so should step down so as not to split the vote etc. I don’t think anyone should give way to anyone else. There is something I learnt from one of my characters in “cooling off day“.

I will not vote according to who I think stands a chance or not. I will not vote in a politically savvy way. I will vote with my heart, my mind, my soul. It is my vote, and it is precious.


Neo Swee Lin first posted this note on her Facebook. TOC thanks Ms Neo for allowing TOC to reproduce the edited version here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Public feedback sought on proposed key amendments to Building Maintenance and Strata Management

The Ministry of National Development (MND) and the Building and Construction Authority…

“感到遭背叛” 部份民众扬言删合力追踪程序

相信“合力追踪”数据的使用,已然成为本周热门话题。本周一(4日),内政部政务部长陈国明证实,刑事诉讼法赋予警方权力,可获取任何数据,包括合力追踪便携器的数据。 然而,主管智慧国计划的外交部长维文,曾在去年6月5日在国会表示,合力追踪数据仅限于防疫追踪用途。他不得不在本月5日再次作出澄清,强调指警方只有在追踪重大罪案时,才能动用“合力追踪”数据。 维文也坦言,在得知刑事诉讼法也适用于“合力追踪”数据,确实曾“睡不着觉”,“我在想:是否要说服我的内阁同僚修法?但经过深思熟虑、讨论和质询了朝野内外人士的意见,我想目前这样我们做得很好,能确保新加坡的安全,也能应对当前危机。” 事实上,即便个人敏感数据如电话或银行账号记录,都可在刑事诉讼法下用来协助调查。然而,据本地英语媒体《今日报》报导,一些民众似乎不满部长言论“前后不一”,包括本地作家吴易盛,直言“感觉被背叛”,如今删掉“合力追踪”程序,宁可把便携器留在家中。 他指出,这个议题最关键在于群众的信任,部长改变说法,让他“感觉被背叛”,这足以削弱人们对政府的信心。这是因为政府早前明明承诺数据仅用于防疫,追踪近接触病例,人们都予以信任。然而,直到本周才在国会揭发,在刑事诉讼法下,警方仍能获取合力追踪数据。 “如果你(部长)早前已意识到,数据不可能有完全隐私,那么为何不早说?” 此前吴易盛也为政府说好话,鼓励友人使用合力追踪,但此事不仅造成他对政府的信任遭侵蚀,也影响友人对他的信任。 南洋理工大学社会科学助理教授Walid Jumblatt Abdullah坦言,此事可能影响合力追踪的使用率;社会企业家Tham Jun Han则关掉了手机蓝牙功能,不再全面使用合力追踪数据。…

Heng: Reserves may be put to use to finance second support package

The Singapore government is not ruling out the need to utilise past…

Founder and CEO of Second Chance Properties expresses interest in standing for upcoming Presidential Election

According a report by Straits Times last night, there might not be…