by: Jen Tai/
Photos: Shawn Danker/

There are many things that are Uniquely Singapore, some of which are not positive. One of these things is taking part in highly unsatisfactory elections. For many Singaporeans, we didn’t get to vote for years/decades till May 2011 and even then it was most unsatisfactory as residents in Tanjong Pagar still didn’t get to vote due to a technical 3-second legality. And for many who did vote, they had to vote for GRC teams, some of which comprised members whom the voters did not like nor want to support.

This Presidential Election is turning out to be even more unsatisfactory and almost farcical. The time given for Singaporeans to really know the Presidential candidates is much too short (yet again) and this is doing a great disservice to the electorate. In this space of time, we have been left feeling confused and dissatisfied, which may have been the intent of the political strategists.

Given the situation and the slate of candidates, the elections is fast becoming a case of voting for who we object to least rather than who we really want for many Singaporeans.

Putting aside the camps that are devoted PAP/Tony Tan supporters, and the respective supporters of Tan Jee Say, Tan Cheng Bock and Tan Kin Lian, it seems clear that a significant number of voters still do not know who they want to vote for.

For this group of the “undecideds”, many are united on one thing – they do not want Tony Tan who is proving, with every electioneering comment that he makes, that he is totally pro-government, steeped in old-school PAP arrogance and is likely to protect and maintain the status quo if elected President.

Choosing one of the remaining three Tans is a dilemma as all three have clear flaws which have been pointed out in other commentaries and in online forums. But all three do show genuine sincerity and passion in wanting to make changes that are better for Singaporeans.

Meantime as one of the “undecideds” I only know what I don’t want in our President:

  1. Someone who does not have the stature of a President to represent Singapore.
  2. Someone who makes us feel queasy when we look upon Presidential wall photos.
  3. Someone who is inarticulate and speaks broken English.
  4. Someone who does not have the morals, conviction and compassion to do what is right for Singaporeans.
  5. Someone who is bent on protecting the ruling party’s power base.
  6. Someone who does not have the guts to speak up and the stamina to stay the course for Singaporeans.
  7. Someone who lacks the EQ to understand the people and how to work with the ruling party.
  8. Someone with a questionable history of cockiness and past behavior.

Going by some of the criteria eliminates one of the candidates for me – Tan Kin Lian. As for Tan Jee Say, he has the guts and has raised good issues, but he comes across as overly aggressive.

As for Tan Cheng Bock, he remains a mystery to me as to who he really is and I wonder how far he will go to do the right thing in protecting our country’s reserves and in speaking up for Singaporeans. But interestingly, he may turn out to be the “safe” vote for many people.

So what are we “undecideds” going to do come August 27? Many are waiting to see which of the non pro-establishment Tans is leading in the race by end of this week. The game plan, it seems, is to vote for the leading candidate to boost his chances of winning. How they will know which of these three Tans to bet on is going to be challenging.

What is clear though, is that this election is turning out to be one that is not by choice but by elimination for many voters. And that is totally unsatisfactory and unbecoming for a Presidential Election.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

前进党办《新加坡贫穷,社会安全网政策鸿沟》讲座 短短一小时座位订罄

新加坡前进党将在下月10日(星期二)晚上7时30分至9时30分,于恭锡路The Working Capitol举办公共政策讲座,邀请经济学家杨南强主讲《新加坡贫穷,社会安全网政策鸿沟》议题。 杨南强曾担任国大李光耀公共政策研究所兼职教授的,也是新加坡政府投资公司(GIC)前首席经济师。 在上述讲座,杨南强将与与会者讨论当前政府和新加坡社会面对的社会贫富不均问题,以及在这个富裕国度内出现令人吃惊的绝对贫穷问题,同时讨论消除这些不幸社会问题的措施。 尽管此前已有不少政策推出以扶助贫穷者和缩短社会分层,但实则我国的社会安全网仍不足以应对大部分国民当前面对的生活、经济等挑战。 前进党举办系列讲座,旨在邀请相关专家、领袖,与该党支持者和民众分享、讨论对于国内重大议题的观点,促进更为丰富、多元角度的思想交流。 不过据前进党官方脸书通告,讲座通知才刚发出一个小时,即获得热烈反应,座位预订被一扫而空。不过该党表示,会在当天进行讲座直播,让有兴趣者都能透过脸书直播聆听讲座。 去年11月,针对贸工部长陈振声指出,经一番努力而取得成就的人不应被泛指为精英主义者,杨南强抨击后者,与其巧言令色声称精英应该回馈社会,倒不如把拨款用在更实质、有效的政策,以便在更大程度上根除令新加坡耻辱的贫富不均问题。 “如果我们的最高领导们,真的有诚意帮助社会弱势群体、创造更平等的机会,为何我们扶助绝对贫穷群体的基本薪资政策,还是如此可悲?”

Polling agents behaviour reinforce stereotype of PAP being “arrogant and not playing fair”, says WP polling agent

A polling agent for the Worker’s Party in Marine Parade GRC said…

DHL Global Forwarding recognised as Top Employer 2020 in Asia Pacific

DHL Global Forwarding, the leading global brand in the logistics industry, and…

Dae Sung Construction fined $42,000 for damaging water main

A construction company was fined S$42,000 earlier on 2 April 2019 for…