The following is an appeal letter sent to the Public Transport Council today by CAN!, a network group of people with disabilities.

Mr Gerard Ee
Chariman
Public Transport Council

Dear Mr Ee

Although the fare adjustment would be another added burden for the people with disability, we welcome the news that now concession hours for the elderly is extended to the full-day, throughout the week.

Once again, we write to you to appeal for subsidy of fares for people with disabilities on public transportation. Not all people with disabilities are children, students or senior citizens, to enjoy the subsidy given to these by the public transport operators.

The various other help schemes highlighted by you in your letter dated 7 December 2009, has limitations of scope and capacity, and besides the assorted constituency-based targeted financial help, all the other schemes do not address the need for public transportation for the people with disabilities to be subsidised. As for the constituency-based targeted financial help, not all CCCs provide such financial assistance for transportation purposes, and even if they do, it is limited.

Many people with disabilities who are not children, students or senior citizens, work as buskers, masseuse or telemarketers. Many more are unable to work, due to their severe disabilities but would have to travel to hospitals and other places of necessities or leisure, and the unsubsidised fares on our public transportation are a major burden to these group of Singaporeans.

Most more able people with disabilities earn no more than $600 per month working full-time; and to spend more than $100 of this hard-earned money for transportation would mean that we would have very little to take back home after all the other deductions.

We are not asking for sympathy, even if charity is most welcomed, we are not asking for charity. We are asking for dignity with this appeal for concession on our public transports.

With the implementation of distance-based fare system and with the progressive decision made by PTC to extend all-day concessionary travel for the elderly, the PTC has now got to reconsider more carefully the issue of subsidy for the less able members of our country.

The measure of civilisation is how it treats its weakest members. We ask PTC to recommend to the public transport operators that subsidy be extended to the people with disabilities who are not children, students or senior citizens as well.

Thanking you in anticipation.

Yours sincerely

Reena Rajesvari
CAN! Coordinator

Copy to:

Mr Lui Tuck Yew
Transport Minister

Ms Sylvia Lim
MP for Aljunied GRC

The following is PTC’s reply to CAN! on their earlier appeal.


CAN!’s website is HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Manpower Minister says 60,000 job vacancies available and nearly half meant for PMETs, netizens claim it’s far from reality

Manpower Minister Josephine Teo said on Monday (22 July) that there are…

律师入禀高庭申请 强制公积金局准丈夫储蓄救患癌妻

人权律师拉维于今日(7月10日)在脸书更新近况,表示他的律师团队已经入禀高庭,以申请强制令要求公积金局,准许印裔丈夫苏利亚把自己的公积金储蓄,转移给妻子作抗癌医疗费用。 此前本社报导,苏利亚希望能治好妻子的病,向中央公积金局申请,将自己的普通和特别户头存款,转移到妻子的保健储蓄(medisave)户头,好让妻子能继续抗癌。但是,公积金局拒绝了苏利亚的要求。 47岁的印裔妇女莎若吉妮在2016年底被诊断患有卵巢癌,自此他们一家也饱受煎熬,财务状况也陷入困顿。如今莎若吉妮的癌症病况已进入第四期。 莎若吉妮的丈夫苏利亚,也将寻求法庭诠释,《公积金法》第18(D)条,阻止他使用普通和特别户头储蓄转移到妻子的保健储蓄,作治疗用途,是否涉及违宪。 拉维也呼吁各界善心人士慷慨解囊,捐款助莎若吉妮抗癌,助他们一家度过难关。相关的捐款链接:https://simplygiving.com/…/help-me-to-save-my-wife-life-who… 罹癌后莎若吉妮日益消瘦,从原本体重76公斤降至36公斤,而每次的化疗疗程就要1万6000新元。他们的保险可支付70巴仙费用,但仍需负担余下30巴仙的4800元。再者,常年来也累积拖欠约6万200元的医疗费。 此外,苏利亚还有19岁儿子的升学费用要负担,但目前他们仍未接受任何政府公共援助。 为了治病和住院,莎若吉妮公积金积蓄所剩无几,而且如今已动用丈夫的保健储蓄,没有多余的钱来应付医疗开销。 莎若吉妮是在私人医院接受治疗。“此前曾前往国立大学医院征询第二意见,但是后者只是建议:尽量带你妻子到能让她感到开心的地方,也意即他们没有把握医好我。” 她说别无选择下,她只能回到伊丽莎白私人医院就诊,她强调她不是为了奢侈享受,而是该医院至少尽力确保她能活下去。 丈夫苏利亚在接受采访时表示,公积金局不赞同让他提取普通和特别户头的存款,作为治疗妻子的医疗费用。 “即便我告诉他们,我的保健储蓄已经用光了,但他们有条例需遵守,仍不同意我使用上述户头存款。”…

Did Today de-satirize letter?

The letter that was published in Today Voices: The original letter sent…

廖文良辞樟宜机场集团主席职务

樟宜机场集团主席廖文良,宣布将辞去主席一职,同时也卸下盛裕集团主席、淡马锡高级国际业务顾问、基金会成员等职务。 廖文良是在今晚(10日)发表声明,指出:“认识我的人,都知我在这些机构履行职务时抱有热忱。我不希望我目前的情况,影响我所属机构的董事局、管理层和职员,让他们无法专注应付许多更重要事务。” 他也强调,在前女佣案件,都与警方完全配合,对于高庭的判决,也表示“对司法有信心,也尊重高庭决定”。 总检察署早前已表示有意检讨此案,廖文良也表示,他和家人会继续配合协助。 高庭法官陈成安,在上周五的判决质疑廖家父子有“不当意图”,(improper motives),被告有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。