Excerpt of TOC’s exclusive interview with Mr Tan Kin Lian:


TOC: Well referring to an article that you wrote in 2004, you wrote about the casinos and you wrote that you “support the idea of a casino” and that “it does not matter that some Singaporeans will eventually gamble in these casino”. You also wrote that, “It is not the job of the government to stop Singaporeans from gambling in those casinos” Can you explain what you really meant?

TKL: I think I must explain more clearly because I think there is some misperception. Firstly what is gambling? Now my family goes to my mother who is 87 years old and she likes to play mahjong. And around the mah-jong table they do have some money passed. Is that gambling? I don’t think so. If you are going to play mah-jong if you are going to have some stake, it’s more fun. I don’t consider that gambling. Similarly there are many people who go to buy- line up to buy TOTO. It’s just a way to pass the week to look forward to something. So long as the amount of money that you spend is the same money that you would spend on entertainment. Some people spend 200-300 dollars to watch one show. Other people spend that money to buy 4D or TOTO. So gambling in small amounts of money is alright. Even if you have to go to the casino, because there are things in the casino – so long as you bet with money that you set aside for this.

Now when it becomes big scale, when you bet money you cannot afford to lose, of course then you must stop it. In fact, I also said that the biggest gamble is not the casino. I said it was the stock market and the currencies. Big sums of money. So therefore we must look up on the question of gambling in a more rational way. Of course there are some gambling that are bad, when people over gamble. When they gamble on owing money. So I also said that there should be, you should ban lending of money for gambling. That’s bad. Gambling on credit is wrong. So I think of course it seems that the casino has become a bit worse than I expected. That means more people gamble large sums that they should not. We must look at this problem. But I still come back on the original premise that so long as you gamble small sums, it’s a form of entertainment.

TOC: Surely, no doubt the casino has reaped economic benefits, but wouldn’t the government have foreseen the social problems that would have arisen from the casinos?

TKL: Ok now the first is the question to foresee, it is very hard to foresee. But it’s easier to act to find the problem. Which you don’t have to foresee because there are many unexpected things but when a problem arises you must act. And since now that I realize that more people are gambling, I must take action to address this issue.


Read the transcript of the exclusive interview HERE.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TOC Op-ed: Awake, Jim Sleeper

By Choo Zheng Xi/ Consultant Editor Yale lecturer Jim Sleeper’s provocatively titled…

国大采纳检讨委会建议 未来严重性犯罪者或立即开除

国大采纳检讨委员会提出的十项建议,加重处置措施,其中针对严重罪行者立即开除。 国大校董会董事郭运光,今早以委员会主席发出电邮给学生、教师以及教职人员,透露最新调查结果,表示委员会针对犯罪行为探讨研究国际最佳范例、向各个学生、教职人员进行15个一对一的对话以及委聘独立调查机构向全校师生进行网络调查,最终制定出更完善的新处置框架。 处置框架含将在送往实习公司或聘雇公司的成绩单上注明停学记录;而记录将在毕业后延续一段时间;停学至少一年以上,同时将以“犯下严重罪行”为由,禁止进入校内及不允许与受害者接触;罪行严重者将会被开除。 另外,犯罪者需经医疗专业者或辅导者的检定,才能重返校园,每一名犯罪者都需配一名个案负责官员全程监督过程,并在康复治疗提供支持。 而针对受害者的支持系统,调查委员会提议国大应加强相关资源介入,建立受害者关怀中心,聘雇辅导、社工、心里相关的专业人士及时提供受害者紧迫的需求;加强受害者支持网络,在同侪、宿舍、学院、学系之间建立支持网络系统,及时提供相关讯息、建议。 此外,委会认为近年来性犯罪案件层出不穷,故呼吁国大需提升校园安全性如加强校内的淋浴间的保护措施,也增加了宿舍的保安人员人数,而在全校宿舍洗澡间内也会安装新的洗澡间锁扣,同时至少安装300架新的监视录像。 国大董事会表示全面接受调查委员会提供的意见,而国大校长陈永财教授下来将在未来重新审视委员会提出的意见,并公布落实上述建议的具体计划。为了确保有关框架的有效性,国大也会两年后重新检讨,确保框架合适性。 国大校长陈永财教授下来几天内会公布落实上述建议的具体计划。国大董事会两年后也会重新检讨纪律框架,确保有关框架有效且合时宜。 4月18日,受害者马芸在Instagram分享了她对国大没有对于去年11月,在尤索夫宿舍厕所偷拍她的Nicholas Lim给予更多处罚,感到沮丧。此事很快在国大学生和社会界中引起热烈议论,认为涉事者未获得应有的处罚,而没给予受害者足够的保护。 国大校长陈永财教授随后向国大校友发函道歉,坦言没有第一时间为受害者提供足够协助,而教育部长王乙康则表示有关的处罚“明显不足”。 也有国大学生群组公开,国大三年内有超过20起涉及非礼、偷拍等违规行为;国大也在4月25日,于校内举办与学生对话会,逾700学生挤爆现场,其中包含多名受害者出面叙述及抨击国大在不当性行为处置上过轻,要求重新调整处分制度。同时,国大校方成立检讨委员会检讨惩处框架。