The Ministry of Home Affairs’ statement of 23 September 2011 (see HERE) contains the usual rhetoric, inundated with Cold War parlance such as “Communist United Front activities” and “Marxist plot”. Its intent is clearly to justify the act of arbitrary arrest under the ISA and instil fear in the people.

The statement fails to address the most important concern of the 16 of us, which is indefinite detention without trial. None of us was brought to trial before a court of law. Our imprisonment was solely based on the statements of ISD officers and statements extracted from us while we were subjected to torture, cold room treatment, deprivation of sleep and the threat of indefinite detention.

Article 9 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights to which Singapore is a signatory declares: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.”

We reiterate that the ISA is a draconian law that allows the ruling party to arrest and imprison without trial anyone it deems a threat to its power. Its impact on Singapore over the past half a century has been both crippling and pernicious.

We call upon the Government of Singapore to set up an independent Commission of Inquiry to investigate if the allegations made against us as well as all former ISA detainees are justified. More so when recent publications, memoirs and panel discussions by historians and ex-ISA detainees have given accounts different from the official narrative on the events of those years. We urge the government to have the moral and political courage to set up such a commission in the interest of truth and transparency.

Dated this 28th day of September 2011.

Dr Lim Hock Siew
Dr Poh Soo Kai
Said Zahari
Lee Tee Tong
Loh Miaw Gong
Chng Min Oh @ Chuang Men-Hu
Tan Sin alias Tan Seng Hin
Toh Ching Kee
Koh Kay Yew
Vincent Cheng Kim Chuan
Teo Soh Lung
Yap Hon Ngian
Tan Tee Seng
Low Yit Leng
Wong Souk Yee
Tang Fong Har


16名前政扣者呼吁:设立独立调查委员会

内政部2011年9月23日的声明满载其惯用的字眼,充斥着什么”共产党联合阵线活动”与”马克思主义阴谋”等冷战语调。显然,其意图是要证明在内安法令下,他们的专制任意的逮捕行动是合法的,并在人民当中注入恐惧的心理。

该声明对我们16人最重大的关切点,即无限期和无审讯拘留的事实避而不谈。实际上,在我们当中,没有人曾被控上法庭依法审讯。我们被关进监狱纯粹是根据内安部官员的一纸声明,以及它利用拷打盘问、冷房虐待、剥夺睡眠、及以无限期拘留的恐吓方式,在我们身陷囹圄期间榨取的所谓供词。

《世界人权宣言》第九条款规定:“任何人不得加以任意逮捕、拘禁或放逐”。新加坡是这个宣言的签署国之一,理应遵守这项规定。
我们要重申:内安法是一部残酷的法律,它让执政党可以在不经审判的情形下,逮捕任何它认为对”国家安全构成威胁”的人士。在过去半个世纪多的时间里,它对新加坡构成的冲击是瘫痪性的、是恶毒的。

我们要求新加坡政府设立一个独立的调查委员会,审查对我们16人以及所有在内安法下被拘留的人士所作出的指控,是否有正当理由。尤其是近年来,许多历史学家和前政治扣留者所出版的书刊和回忆录,以及所举办的座谈会所揭露的许多事实,跟当年有关事件的官方论述是有许多
相左的地方。因此,我们要求政府拿出道义与政治勇气,为我们国家的利益着想,设立上述委员会。

2011年9月28日

1. 林福寿医生
2. 傅树楷医生
3. 赛扎哈里
4. 李思东
5. 卢妙萍
6. 莊明湖
7. 陈辛
8. 卓清枝
9. 许庚犹
10. 钟金全
11. 張素兰
12. 叶汉源
13. 陈智成
14. 刘月玲
15. 黄淑仪
16. 陈凤霞

HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!

If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.

114 Responses to “Calling for Commission of Inquiry”

  1. but yea, I still think Vincent Cheng should resign from SDP CEC and cease his membership with SDP before i take him seriously.

    Else he is just in cahoots with SDP to make Singapore look bad.

    And Teo Soh Lung earned from her book sales, stood for elections, everyone knows her, did she join politics to benefit Yuhua residents / Singaporeans as a whole?

    Too many doubts here.

  2. Proud to be Singaporean 29 September 2011

    Yes now we have Yuhui too. The way he/she jumps from topic to topic..just amazing. LOL

  3. Teh Tar Lek 29 September 2011

    Michael Yong, Yuhui, Lim etc…. are all Steven Kho lah. They (he) agreed with them (himself)….

  4. I swear that the other Yuhuis are not me. =.=

    This is scary. I almost left my full name under the name column. I would be dead meat then.

  5. Yuhui 29 September 2011
    I swear that the other Yuhuis are not me.

    …………………………………………

    Sorry guy/girl. Your writing style may be different, but the underlying tone & theme very similar to steven kho & sidekicks.

  6. Chicharito 29 September 2011

    @Kumar,

    Give the girl a benefit of the doubt. I do see 2 different writing styles on 2 different topics. One is about Vicent Cheng and the SDP while the other calling for ISD to detain the 16 detainees forever.

    It is despicable that this steven kho coward even tried to possess a girl’s body to give his nonsense

  7. lim28 September 2011
    In addition to the fact that the COI lacks justification…

    lim28 September 2011
    Fortunately, our parliament is in the right hands at the moment…

    lim28 September 2011
    @Michael Yong
    Agreed. The government should not be subjugated to the whims of 16 insignificant…

    Aaron28 September 2011
    These 16 are just troublemakers, not worthy of our time…

    Yuhui29 September 2011
    At the end of the day, we all have to make decisions…
    ———————–
    Going by avatar identification, the above are comments made by Steven Kho/ Michael Lim, impersonating lim, Aaron, Yuhui.

  8. MHA responds... 29 September 2011

    From state-controlled Channel News Asia:

    No review into detention of ex-ISA detainees: MHA

    SINGAPORE: Singapore’s Home Affairs Ministry said it sees no reason to conduct a review into the detention of the 16 ex-ISA detainees via a Commission of Inquiry.

    It said the detentions under the Internal Security Act (ISA) were made for valid security reasons and properly dealt with according to the law, and that every case was reviewed at that time by the Advisory Board chaired by a Supreme Court judge.

    It added that the subversion and violence of the Communist insurgency from the 1940s to the 1970s are a historical reality, and the government’s actions against the Marxist plot in the late 1980s were fully explained and justified at the time, and extensively debated in Parliament.

    MHA said these actual situations and events which were real threats to Singapore’s security cannot simply be dismissed as “rhetoric”, as the ex-detainees now try to do.

    -CNA/ac

  9. MHA was instructed by their lightning gods.

    The lightning gods are scared shit that their many skeletons will come tumbling out of the cupboard.

    Big bullies turned into chicken shits!

  10. tiredsingaporean 30 September 2011

    you guys can forget about setting up a COI team to investigate into the marxist case as long as the old man is still alive. Who dares to go against him knowing that even a court judge can be replaced with just a phone call. So what if you can proved the old man is guilty, not unless there is enough pressure and influences coming from the various foreign intervention, this is as good as already an X-File case. You think anyone or party strong enough to take on the old man?