~by: Shanta Arul~

I refer to the letter written to the Straits Times by Ms Ooi Hui Mei, Director of Corporate Communications of the People’s Association (PA), on behalf of Deputy Chairman Mr Yam Ah Mee, titled “PA explains rationale for choosing advisers” (see HERE).

This is her second letter to the Forum, explaining the rationale behind the PA’s appointment of grassroots organisations (GRO) advisors.

Firstly, Ms Ooi states that the PA does not take part in para-political activities. However, the fundamental point remains that People’s Action Party (PAP) Members of Parliament represent more than half of the management board of the PA, with no other political party representation. This in itself suggests the statutory board is partisan, compounded by the PA track record of only appointing PAP members as Grassroots Organisations (GRO) advisors, even in constituencies where the public voted in another political party.

Ms Ooi also states that Opposition Members of Parliament (MP) cannot help the government to explain, implement or improve government policies. This suggests that they oppose policies for the sake of opposing, which oversimplifies what Opposition MPs do.

Criticising policies and offering alternatives, as has often been done in Parliament, ensure broader and robust policy debates which can help improve government policies. MPs, whether from the PAP or from an Opposition party, work with their constituents at the grassroots level, and are in the best position to understand their needs and suggest policy improvements.

Opposition MPs may oppose certain government policies in Parliament and as is prescribed by their party manifestos, but this does not give them the liberty to go against existing policies at the grassroots level. In practice, MPs are unable to go against policies simply because they come from opposition parties.

Referring to Ms Ooi’s specific examples, Opposition MPs are not able to relieve their constituents of paying Goods and Services Tax, and neither would they be able to offer alternative forms of welfare to divert from ComCare initiatives, if they do not exist in policy. (Ms Ooi suggests it, but I believe no political party in Singapore has proposed unlimited welfare.) It is therefore conjecture to assert that Opposition MPs cannot be effective GRO advisers.

The role of the MP is to be the bridge between the community and the Government by hearing the concerns of their constituents and representing them in Parliament. Overall, Ms Ooi seems to suggest that MPs cannot conduct their duties if they come from a party outside of the PAP. If this is the case, it is the electorate who should be the judge, not the PA.

Finally, it is worth addressing the involvement of the PA in government policies. Referring to Section 8 of the People’s Association Act, the objects of the Association are listed as follows

8. The objects of the Association are —

(a) the organisation and the promotion of group participation in social, cultural, educational and athletic activities for the people of Singapore in order that they may realise that they belong to a multiracial community, the interests of which transcend sectional loyalties;

(b) the establishment of such institutions as may be necessary for the purpose of leadership training in order to instil in leaders a sense of national identity and a spirit of dedicated service to a multiracial community;

(c) the fostering of community bonding and strengthening of social cohesion amongst the people of Singapore;

(d) the performance of such other functions as may be conferred upon the Association by any written law; and

(e) the carrying out of such activities as appear to the Board to be advantageous towards, or necessary or convenient for, the furtherance of the objects of the Association as set out in paragraphs (a) to (d).

It is quite clear that the mandate of the PA is to help build a more cohesive and engaged society. The PA’s role is not to explain or implement government policies. That role is clearly for the civil service, which the PA is not part of.

Therefore, the concerns the PA has about whether the appointed GRO advisor will be able to effective explain, implement or improve government policies are not within the scope of the PA’s duties and are therefore invalid.

The PA is funded by taxpayers and is thus obliged to serve public not party interests. The PA is justifying actions that disadvantage a set of elected leaders, which in turn disadvantages the constituents whose interests these leaders represent. In openly justifying the exclusion of elected Opposition MPs and appointing the losing election candidates, the PA disrespects the election and the electorate. This goes against the code of ethics and conduct of public service.

It is disappointing that the PA is intent on perpetuating divisions based on party lines, in a manner contrary to its own mission statement, “to Build and to Bridge communities in achieving One People, One Singapore”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

长期需求仍强劲 王瑞杰相信半导体企业能渡过难关

上月,路透社报导,受中美贸易战、对中国华为的政治关切以及消费者需求放缓等因素影响,新加坡芯片和半导体业者已开始放慢生产速度,并裁减数百个工作岗位。 该报导指芯片制造业,在去年占新加坡制造业产出(output)的近三分之一。该行业的下滑,也强化了对于新加坡未来数月可能陷入衰退的预期。 不过,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰今日(14日)表示,尽管全球电子领域进入疲弱周期,不过他相信新加坡应该为未来投资,并加强半导体行业生态圈,能在需求复苏时抓紧新机遇。 他认为,我国半导体行业经历许多商业周期,每一次企业都能度过难关,抓紧机会转型并变得更坚强。 他是在今日出席美国芯片制造商美光科技(Micron Technology),在本地设立的新设施开幕仪式上,这么表示。 王瑞杰说,有研究显示明年开始需求会复苏,接下来预计每年增幅介于二至九巴仙,故此长期来看对半导体的需求仍强劲。 去年4月,美光科技宣布未来五年将在本地投资扩建净室(cleanroom)设施,该美国企业也在2015年投资40亿美元扩建NAND快闪记忆体加工厂。过去20年,已在本地投资共150亿元。 新加坡被视为仰赖出口的经济体和经济风向标。长期以来,芯片生产也是新加坡成功的核心要素之一,而许多全球最大的芯片制造商,也在我国运营。我国生产的微芯片,被用在手机到汽车等广泛领域。

PDPC fines computer service vendor S$4,000 over programming error resulting in disclosure of NSmen’s personal data

The Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) has issued a S$4,000 fine against…

S’pore churches form “Home Away from Home”, collaborate with NHCS to provide shelter for stranded M’sian workers

With the recent border lockdown by the Malaysian government beginning 18 March…

ASP Yong: Priority was to enable rescue operation

By Terry Xu 9.40pm at Orchard NPC. Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP)…