~by: Rina Choo~
~ with: Jewel Philemon~

The Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) hosted a presentation of the book, “ Perspectives on migration flows in Asia and Europe”, by Professor Antonio Marquina, on the 11th of October at their headquarters.

A panel discussion featuring economist Dr Aris Ananta, political scientist Dr Reuban Wong, and migration specialist, Dr Mizanur Rahman, was conducted shortly after the presentation.

Dr Tan Lian Choo, ASEF‘s director of public affairs opened the event and introduced noted Guests-of-Honour ASEF’s executive director, Ambassador Michel Filhol and His Excellency Federico Palomera, Ambassador of Spain to Singapore.

Ambassador Filhol took the stage and introduced the book, which is the third in a series by the Asian and European scholars after publications on Energy and Security and Global Warming.

“Professor Marquina analyses political, economic, social and environmental trends which prevent countries in Asia & Europe from stemming the flow of migrants”, shared Ambassador Filhol, “Factors that have played an important part include an ageing domestic population, the effects of the economic crisis, migration caused by environmental degradation and the exodus of political refugees.”

His Excellency Ambassador Palomera who came on next, heralded the editor of the book and touched on key issues that the book brought up.

He said, “The book is on migration flows and its appropriate policies in Asia and Europe. It touches on push and pull migration economics as well as other issues like the global economic crisis; its impact on migration flows, illegal migration and rapid globalisation.”

Dr Choo then invited Professor Marquina to present his book to His Excellency Ambassador Palomera who accepted it on behalf of Spain.

“It is premature to make bold assumptions on the future of migrations.”

Professor Marquina kick-started the panel discussion by thanking ASEF for the preparation of the event and the presentation of the book, and also extended his thanks to the distinguished panellists, Guests-of-Honour and participants.

He gave a short synopsis of the book, which includes contributions from anthropologists, security specialists, migration specialists, political scientists and environmentalists among others. He admitted that the publication process was “…difficult and time-consuming…”, especially in reference to his earlier works. He added that the book emphasizes on how “It is premature to make bold assumptions on the future of migrations.”

Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of South-East Asian Studies (ISEAS), Dr Aris Ananta, commented on the effects of migration in Asian countries and the impact of migration in society.

“Migration is unavoidable. It is almost impossible to stop it. Stopping its flow is becoming an untenable goal.” he remarked.

Another Research Fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies, Dr Mizanur Rahman, deviated slightly from the topics at hand to talk about Human Rights. He got back on track after a slight reprieve and spoke on the fixed figures a nation allots to migrants, like Canada and Australia as well as policies on migration economic flows that depend on the demand for migrants in the market, citing Kuwait and Oman as examples.

He also shed light on the management of foreigners, the rights of foreigners, and the isolation of foreigners from local due to anti-foreigners sentiments or xenophobia.

The final discussant, Dr Reuben Wong, from the Political Science department of National University of Singapore (NUS) asked, “Who are the foreigners?”

“The book identifies the many different types of foreigners that exist. We have the ‘blue-collar workers’ like construction site workers, ‘Foreign talent’ like those in the healthcare, banking or business profession who are highly welcomed foreigners because they bring in capital, ‘Permanent Resident’ holders, who have certain rights and lastly, ‘the illegals’, who do not fit into these groups.”

He said that these ‘illegals’ pose a big problem in countries like the United States of America, Netherlands and Western Europe, among others. He added that this has led to governments in Western Europe, to clamp down on their migration policies, as well as resorting to forcible deportations.

“I don’t think migration is a modern issue. It has been with us for a long time – since the 19th Century.” He revealed, “The great age of migration has actually passed due to the government’s control and political barriers. However, migration cannot, as evidenced by this book be stopped. The question is how do we adjust to it? How do we mitigate the bad effects- or the side effects of it?”

Dr Choo then opened the floor to questions from the participants.

“Multi-culturalism has been discredited. It has not been failed.”

One participant asked the speakers, in reference to Singapore, what their views were on the supposed failure of multi-culturalism in Europe as well as the public’s ‘anti-foreigner sentiments’. “Why pronounce Multi-Culturalism dead when it has not even started? I’ve also researched on and personally interviewed foreigners and locals alike; find myself identifying with both groups in terms of where they are coming from. Do you have any comments?” she asked.

Dr Reuben Wong took her first question, saying that “Multi-culturalism has been discredited. It has not been failed. It is on-going whenever new-comers come into the scene. However the British and French Prime Ministers had indeed publicly rejected the model of Multi-culturalism. This is because everyone’s sense of nationalism is increasing. National identity is shifting.”

The question on ‘anti-foreign sentiments’ though, could not be discussed further due to the lack of time.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

周六竞选推介活动场地临时被取消 民主党接受租借方道歉

新加坡民主党在上周六(23日)举行竞选备战推介会,不过场地方面曾遭波折,场地租借方国度家庭教会管理单位KCCVenture公司,前一天才通知取消场地。不过后者董事会已在昨日发文告致歉,民主党也接受道歉。 KCCV向媒体表示,对场地取消和此事引起的误会负责,并向裕廊集团和民主党双方致歉,并同意退还租金和协助承担民主党寻找替代场地的费用。 在文告中,KCCV也表示民主党都有和他们讨论场地的使用,后者也已付租金。虽然KCCV清楚知道活动的用途,不过并未事先向产业主裕廊集团和KCCV董事会报备,他们直到上周五才得知场地用作进行民主党竞选推介会。 同时,下属也借用裕廊集团进行突发检查,而作为突然取消场地的理由,他们也对此作出道歉。 “有关场地一般只用作培训、音乐制作用途” 在文告中,KCCV表示,有关场地一般只用作录影录音、访谈、音乐培训和后期制作等用途,故此用来举办政党活动并不在该公司的场地租借业务中。 再者,若有不符合该公司常规业务的活动,产业主和KCCV董事会也理应获得事先报备。该公司表示,随着此次误会事件,他们也已制定方针避免重犯。 民主党虽表示接受KCCV公司的道歉,不过该党也提到,裕廊集团曾指责民主党,把场地取消和该公司进行的检查混为一谈“不负责任”。 民主党赞扬KCCV公司承认错误,也希望裕廊集团方面也能对此事回应并道歉。 在22日中午,即民主党竞选推介活动的前一天,KCCV才透过电邮通知,基于“无法预料的JTC突发检查”,必须取消场地,打乱了原本的活动安排。 国度家庭教会的会所位于裕廊集团位于115 Eunos…

商业筹款者准则推出 沿街募捐人士须遵守

慈善机构有好消息,商业筹款者准则推出后,规范街头募款的守则,沿街募捐不必再被误认为是骗子。 有关准则主要是针对受委为慈善机构或项目,而展开实地筹款的商业机构或个人,以确保他们在规范内募捐,而公众也能放心捐款。 由慈善总监办事处和新加坡警察部队、业者联合定制的商业筹款者准则(Code for Commercial Fund-raisers),长达10页。准则内含有包括慈善法令或沿街挨户募款法令(House to House and Street Collections Act)等,现有法令中的一些条规,以及新拟定的应当遵守行为,分成筹款前、筹款中以及筹款后的注意事项。…

Cow seen at lift landing of block 506B in Yishun

Netizens were taken by surprise as a picture of a cow waiting for…

部落客质问:谁才真正从公共医疗津贴下受惠?

本地部落客Phillip Ang Keng Hong 在11日,于部落格上载一篇有关公共医疗津贴的文章,文章指他发现综合诊所的一般收费竟然比私人诊所来得高,令他不禁质疑所谓公共医疗津贴的存在意义? 该名部落客指出,新加坡人民应该对“一般综合诊所的费用竟比私人诊所来得高”更警觉,事实上,人民并没有享受太多的医疗津贴。 他分享了在自己在切除囊肿手术的时所经验的事情。根据公共医疗津贴,Phillip他必须在综合诊所咨询,获得医生的转介信前往大医院见专科医生,这就要价13新元。 林总费用加起来都要325元 数周后,他解释身为一名拥有公共医疗津贴资格的病人,他必须再支付37新元的专科医生咨询费给医院,安排手术。而手术后的预估费用约为275新元(或更多)。 基于林林种种的费用,只是一个微手术,就总共要花费325新元。 Phillip最后前往私人诊所咨询并安排手术,仅需支付总价280新元,再三考量后,他索性取消樟宜医院的安排,前往私人诊所治疗。 他在文章撰述,“政府医院虽然有宣称有70巴仙的医疗津贴补助,但试想若以上为基准,便可算出一个简单的囊肿手术在未津贴前,竟然要价1000新元。就算是一个无知的人,也可知道政府所谓的”享有高额医疗津贴”的说法是不存在的”。…