~by: Ghui

Former Minister Lee Kuan Yew has asserted that Singapore needs more immigrants to boost its population. He has justified this by pointing out that Singaporeans are not reproducing at a rate which can sustain our population. He further alluded to his belief that population shrinkage will  lead to economic stagnation.

I have no quarrel with immigration. Singapore is after all a nation made up of immigrants. In fact, I believe that most Singaporeans do not oppose immigration for the sake of it. The root cause of the frustration expressed by Singaporeans is not at immigration per se but the rate of it and the policies surrounding it.

Many Singaporeans see the influx of immigrants as a threat. Not just to their jobs but to their day to day lives as well. On our overstretched public transport, they appear to compete with us for seats. On the food front, they have allegedly insulted our curry. The list of apparent insults goes on.

What this stems from is not hatred for the foreigners themselves but a lack of clarity on the immigration policies and insufficient assimilation on the part of the foreigners. Assimilation is a gradual process which wholesale and fast paced immigration does not aid. Human relationships take time to foster and the shortened time caused by reactionary immigration en masse breeds unnecessary suspicion. Singaporeans feel that their space is encroached and foreigners in turn find their hosts unaccommodating and unfriendly. This atmosphere is negative and creates an “us versus them” mentality which is neither healthy nor beneficial for the country.

Mr Lee has said that without immigration, our economy would stagnate. I have no doubt that he meant well for Singapore when he said that. A glittering economy that grows by leaps and bounds every year is his vision for Singapore. To him, our success is measured by GDP figures and that is his version of prosperity. But what about the rest of Singapore? What is our measure for success?

Of late, many people I speak to appear wistful. They long for the days when Singapore was less crowded and when life was less stressful. They yearn for the days when Singaporeans were more communal and less antagonistic towards foreigners. We did not have as many beautiful buildings then and we did not play host to the F1. We were certainly not the international city that we are today but were we more content?

The current xenophobia is but a manifestation of a deeper issue. The bigger picture is our collective vision for Singapore. Mr Lee has his vision and his vision is one for continued economic growth. Singaporeans must think for themselves what they really want and vote for the government they feel will best fulfil their vision of Singapore.

It is our country and our future that is at stake. Mr Lee’s vision may not be wrong but it may be different from what Singaporeans really want and that is the issue that must be examined.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

West Coast GRC MP more receptive towards discussing 377A with his constituents

Early last week, a resident of the Nee Soon GRC shared a…

Dr Lim Hock Siew's Funeral

~ By Cheong Yaoming ~     The sky was dark and threatened to…

马交长发视频 解释ILS系统影响

马国交通部长陆兆福,在个人脸书转发一段视频,向马国民众解释,为何政府反对实里达机场落实仪表着陆系统(ILS),并呼吁新加坡修改起降航线。 有关视频解释,ILS能在视线欠佳时引导飞机起降,大幅提高飞机的起降安全。 实里达机场距离马来西亚柔佛巴西古当仅两公里,如果要落实ILS,飞机就必须飞过巴西古当上方,降落到实里达机场。 ILS系统下,距机场三公里处地面高度限制54米 视频中提到,ILS对于地面障碍物或建筑物高度有限制,距离实里达机场三公里处,地面障碍物高度不得超过54米,六公里处的高度限制则是不超过145米。 “这意味着,一台高103米的移动起重机,就已经违反了三公里处的高度限制。” 受ILS高度限制的地域,无法兴建高建筑物,估计从南部巴西古当、东至亚逸大华和北部的哥打丁宜等城镇,都可能受ILS高度限制的影响。 而巴西古当也无法兴建高建筑物,港口将来也会曝露在风险,发展也受诸多限制。 视频提到如果没有采用ILS,飞机师能避开障碍物,对于航线周围的地面建筑物也没有高度限制。 以下为陆兆福转发的视频: 我国实里达机场将在明年1月3日起落实ILS系统。 早前,陆兆福透过媒体呼吁我国规划实里达空域的飞行和起降路径。

The freedom to assemble peacefully in Singapore:  An illusory right?

By Priscilla Chia Many of you might be familiar with the Speaker’s Corner.…