~by: Ng Yi Shu~

~picture: Cheong Yaoming~

Two NGOs for shark conservation, Shark Savers and Project: FIN, protested against Singapore’s unwillingness to ban shark fin products, at the Animal Welfare Symposium last Saturday. 

Project: FIN founder Jennifer Lee quoting a WildAid letter in her question to Minister K Shanmugam and the panel at the end of the symposium, protested against trade interests behind the ‘marine life experts’ Hank Jenkins and Dr. Giam Choo Hoo, exposing their conflicts of interest with wildlife trade.
 
Mr Jenkins and Dr Giam had spoken at a recent seminar organised by the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore, emphasising that 'shark's fin soup is culturally discriminating'. 
 
The WildAid letter said: 
“Having known Dr. Giam for some time, I don't think he would claim to be a "marine life expert." He is a former vet who was in charge of the bureaucratic aspects of wildlife import and export in Singapore. I believe he still serves on the board of a reptile skin trading company and has served on a CITES committee where he was a tireless advocate against restrictions or controls on trade in threatened and endangered species. 
 
"You would need to ask him who pays his expenses and consultancy now. Whenever I’ve asked him, he wouldn't tell.
 
"To my knowledge, Dr. Giam has never conducted any original research on sharks of any kind nor has he visited any of the shark fisheries to which he refers. At one point, I offered for my colleague, who had done such research, to make him better informed on sharks, and his response was, "Oh no, she knows too much.
 
"Similarly, Hank Jenkins is not a "marine life expert." I believe his expertise is in crocodile farming. He too has been a strong advocate for trade in wildlife and endangered species, such as "farming" tigers.
 
They are, of course, like the shark fin traders they represent, entitled to their opinions, but to suggest they are experts in sharks or marine life is misleading.”
Professor Steve Oakley from Shark Savers Malaysia felt that his presentation at ISEAS was misquoted by the newspapers. 
 
Presenting a summary of his findings to Mr Shanmugam, Professor Oakley questioned Dr Giam Choo Hoo's representation of Singapore on the CITES board as there were conflicting interests. 
 
The main reasons tackling the illegal wildlife trade is ineffective may be due to the fact that the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), being a political organisation which uses economic trade as a tool to tackle the illegal wildlife trade, has conflicting trade and conservation interests, Professor Oakley noted. 
 
“Isn’t this like asking the mass murderer what kind of sentence he should get?”, a participant at the symposium asked.
 
Professor Oakley believes that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) should be the appropriate organisation to deal with conservation. 
 
In a conversation with TOC, Patricia Lorenz and Jennifer Lee of the NGOs Shark Savers and Project: FIN explained why they were fighting for their cause. 
 
In their news release titled ‘Feedback from Shark Savers and Project: FIN’, they said that current consumption of shark is unsustainable, threatening shark populations and ocean health by tipping over the ecological scales and destroying the fragile food chain. Sharks are critically important to the health of our oceans and depletion of shark populations has been to shown to negatively impact valuable fisheries and marine habitats. They believe that rampant overfishing of sharks is primarily driven by consumer demand for highly valuable fins – which has led to all 14 of shark species most prevalent in the trade to be classified by the IUCN as near extinction. 
 
In their recommendations, Shark Savers and Project: FIN pressed for the expansion of legislation, namely for the Endangered Species Act to include the IUCN Red List of Endangered Species as it is the most comprehensive, objective global approach in evaluating conservation status. This move will also mean that products from the 14 species of shark which are most impacted by the shark fin trade will be regulated and banned.
 
Shark Savers and Project: FIN also quoted apparent health risks in the consumption of shark fin as one of the main reasons AVA should look into the banning of fins. 
 
A study published by University of Miami found high concentrations of BMAA (β-Methylamino-L-alanine) in shark fins, a neurotoxin linked to neurodegenerative diseases in humans including Alzheimer's and Lou Gehrig Disease (ALS). The study suggests that consumption of shark fin soup and cartilage pills may pose a significant health risk for degenerative brain diseases.
 
BMAA was first linked to neurodegenerative diseases in Guam, which resulted in the progressive loss of structure and function of neurons.
 
The shark study found a similar range and even higher BMAA in the fins tested. The new study found levels of BMAA which overlapped the levels measured in the brains of Alzheimer's and ALS victims. Surprisingly, this level fits with the BMAA levels in fruit bats examined in Guam, where ingestion of fruit bats had a link to the severe ALS/Parkinsonism dementia that afflicted many people in Guam.
 
 
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chili’s Singapore blames tightening of foreign worker quota for its closure

Last month, Chili’s Singapore announced the closure of its restaurant chain. Chili’s…

Manpower Minister Josephine Teo’s use of POFMA on SDP’s statements are “not appropriate” argues SDP in court

Invoking the use of the Protection From Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act…

前进党邀精神科医生洪永元 浅谈在疫情下的身心灵调整

新加坡前进党昨日发布新视频,该党秘书长陈清木医生,向网民介绍该党党员洪永元医生,邀请后者与网民在线上浅谈如何在疫情危机下,调整身心灵渡过难关。 他是一名有30多年经验的知名精神科医生,相信这也是他首次曝光于网络媒体。 由于近期我国已落实“阻断措施”,而冠状病毒19疫情危机也可能令民众感到压力或焦虑。洪永元认为,冠病危机给人们带来焦虑和不安,人们感到焦虑、恐惧和失落感,而日常生活也不再像从前那样。 但他指出,当前的措施乃是保障民众的福祉和遏制疫情继续扩大。但危机中仍存在着机会,他认为众人可借此时机,重新评估生活、改善我们的免疫系统,并让科学家找到疫苗来应对当前致命敌人。 不同的人应对这场危机也有不同的反应,如何应对负面情绪?其中一个方法是修习正念,关注自身的呼吸、平常心、感恩自身仍平安健康等。同时把心放开,从另一角度看待这场危机。同时,也用这段期间休息和反省自身,或是培养新爱好等,以及避免盲从网络上的假新闻或负面新闻,让自己焦虑。

N水准考生击退生活困难 获工教院有条件录取

“即使现在仍然经历困难,但还能保持如同当兵一样坚毅的心,在过去两年中,坚持过来。” 这是一名仅17岁的女孩努兰(Nurain Sanusi)的心情,也是一直支撑她挺过生活上所有苦难。 上周N水准考试成绩放榜,共有9千752名普通(学术)源流考生参加考试,其及格率达99.5巴仙,比起2017年的99.4巴仙上升了;而普通(工艺)源流则有4千034名学生参加考试,而而其及格率达98.1巴仙,而努兰则是其中一名。 其中,近8成的学生成绩良好,可以升入中五行列参加O水准考试。而今年,普通工艺源流学生若在N水准会考英文和数学考获A,以及在另一科考获B或更佳成绩的学生也能转到普通学术源流班。 《今日报》描述,努兰在领取成绩时开心地向同学和老师展示,很难想象她为了这一张及格的成绩单付出比平常人还要努力的时光。 父母离异、母亲健康出问题 当你可能在这个年纪还在无忧无虑的过日子时,她就必须一肩扛起生活问题。小小年纪的她被父母的离婚、母亲的健康问题等生活与经济问题缠绕,导致她在小学二年级或三年级开始,就无法专注在学业上。 面对生活上的苦与难,小时候的她并不清楚该如何排解,只能试图透过割腕和自伤来排解痛苦,加上无法跟上上了中学后,自己无法跟上学习的脚步,经常出现逃课行为,甚至在一周内达三至四天都不去上课。 尽管当时出现令学校费解的行为,努兰却还是秉持着善良的心,她发现她的同学—16岁的Ivan Sombrado Chiang由于先天脊椎问题,脊椎发育不全,他必须从海军部队地铁站,独自坐着轮椅上学。短短的10分钟对他而言却相当不轻松。…