~by: Ravi Philemon~

With the passing away of Dr Toh Chin Chye, many have come forward to express gratitude for his immense contribution to the country. Some from the opposition and the civil society also have expressed their admiration for him.

Mr Chiam See Tong for example paid tribute to him saying, "I admire Dr Toh for how he fought for the independence of Singapore from the British, and then helped our country to move forward after our separation from Malaysia. He was the epitome of dedication to and sacrifice for public service, and will be remembered as one of Singapore’s key founding fathers."

Think Centre, a human rights NGO said, " The Singapore that we and future generations know in history, whom live comfortably in and runs efficiently of today and tomorrow, could not have materialised without Dr Toh Chin Chye's dare to challenge and progressive spirit and doing", in paying tribute to Dr Toh.

Even the Singapore Democratic Party, which is rarely sympathetic with anything PAP, expressed their condolences to the family of Dr Toh Chin Chye.

But while we remember and appreciate Dr Toh for his many contributions to the nation, we must not forget that he was only human, which means that there were shades of grey which must be talked about, in remembering the man.

For example, in 1974, when Dr Toh was the Vice-Chancellor of Singapore University, immigration officers accompanied by riot police conducted a pre-dawn raid at the university's campus, detaining and deporting six students who were active in the University's student union.

This action was in contrast to what Dr Toh said in his national day message on 3 August 1987, to his constituents in Rochore. 

In his message to the Rochore residents, Dr Toh lamented that after 30 years, Singapore could still not tolerate dissenting voice. In recalling that he was a dissident once with some others in the PAP, he said that he worked 'hand-in-hand' with the communists and the Marxists.

When he said that he himself had read Marx, it warranted a reply from Lim Boon Heng, who said, "As far as I know, the young Dr Toh never advocated a Marxist state, nor the classless society", because that statement by Dr Toh, seemed to imply that he was sympathetic to the alleged Marxist Conspirators (or perhaps even believed that they were no conspirators) , who were detained by the government of Singapore in May 1987.

Another noteworthy incident is, in September 1979, Dr Toh advocated that schizophrenics be sterilised, as he said that that was the only way to prevent schizophrenia from being inherited.

Being an academic, Dr Toh had probably referred to the studies of Gottesman and Shields and Heston to come to the conclusion that there is a genetic link for schizophrenia, and because he believed in improving the genetic composition of the population, he advocated it.

The Singapore Medical Association was swift in cautioning against this advocacy for sterilisation by Dr Toh. SMA said that sterilisation for schizophrenics should be voluntary and that they should not be cajoled or coaxed into it.

A prominent psychiatrist also spoke up against this proposed initiative of Dr Toh saying that the degree of schizophrenia varied from case to case and that there had been cases where the patients had totally recovered. To deny anyone the opportunity of fathering or mothering a child is in itself an added 'burden' which could increase the schizophrenics' suffering, the psychiatrist cautioned, and added, "to deny these people the right to father is not right".

But Dr Toh was not the only one from his generation of leaders to hold to this belief of improving the gene pool of Singaporeans by discouraging reproduction by persons presumed genetic defects, or of having inheritable undesirable traits.

Mr Lee Kuan Yew too held to this belief. And this belief was the reason for the anti-natalist 'Stop at Two' policy of the PAP government in the early 60s and 70s; and the Graduate Mothers' Scheme, mooted in 1984.

This belief in the superior gene pool also gives rise to the belief in racial superiority.

Speaking at a Chinese New Year celebration, Mr Lee Kuan Yew had said, Singaporeans should accept immigrants or " the population of Chinese Singaporeans in the next generation, 18 to 20 years, will half".

One need not be surprised that Mr Lee said this because Mr Lee's belief in racial superiority is not new:

"Three women were brought to the Singapore General Hospital, each in the same condition and needing a blood transfusion. The first, a Southeast Asian was given the transfusion but died a few hours later. The second, a South Asian was also given a transfusion but died a few days later. The third, an East Asian, was given a transfusion and survived. That is the X factor in development." – Mr Lee Kuan Yew (27 December 1967)

History tells us that there were at least two occasions where Mr Lee wanted to resign as Prime Minister, and that Dr Toh could have chosen to become the PM if he had wanted to.

Would we have seen a different Lee Kuan Yew and a different Toh Chin Chye if the roles had been reversed and Lee Kuan Yew was made to step down from the cabinet earlier for the political renewal process, instead of Dr Toh?

It was Lee Kuan Yew after all who had said as an opposition leader in 1956:

"Repression, Sir is a habit that grows. I am told it is like making love-it is always easier the second time! The first time there may be pangs of conscience, a sense of guilt. But once embarked on this course with constant repetition you get more and more brazen in the attack. All you have to do is to dissolve organizations and societies and banish and detain the key political workers in these societies. Then miraculously everything is tranquil on the surface. Then an intimidated press and the government-controlled radio together can regularly sing your praises, and slowly and steadily the people are made to forget the evil things that have already been done, or if these things are referred to again they're conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will be no opposition to contradict." 

One must not forget that Mr Lee Kuan Yew and Dr Toh Chin Chye were cut from the same cloth, in trying to lionise Dr Toh Chin Chye. 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Commuters advised to cater for additional travelling time on NSL as checks are carried out for new signalling system

In a statement issued yesterday, local transport operator, SMRT cautioned commuters that…

盘点2018年新闻回顾

时光荏苒,经历一年熙熙攘攘,很快我们就走到了2018年的尾声。在这一天,大家最适合坐下来,重新回顾过去一年所经历、为自己、加过做过了什么,从而检讨是否有不足之处,在迈入新的一年时,当如何改进。 李总理也在他的个人脸书发布了他的2018年回顾,但对于草根群众,我们所看见和体验的2018,不必然和他一样。在这里本社约略整理了本年度属于公民社会的回顾,内里有群众较关注和热议的议题,有些令人愤慨痛心,有些令人振奋,让我们相信困境和苦难中,值得坚持下去的希望。 不过鉴于课题众多,经过取舍也无法一一涵括,仅此作为2018年的简述回溯,因为过去的事件不仅仅是历史,也是后人当汲取的教训,让我们记得政客领袖说过的话,让我们从事件中观察国家发展的动态,不再重蹈覆辙。   拟议聘台湾辅警驻守关卡 内政部长尚穆根在一月指出,虽然过去一年我国辅警人数增加了300多名,但新马关卡还是面对人手不足问题,拟议聘请台湾辅警协助驻守关卡。结果为此遭网民挞伐,指出应改善辅警薪资,否则不如连部长也请外籍人士担当,解决人手不足问题。 公布2018财政预算案 财政部长王瑞杰在2月19日公布2018财政预算案,宣布政策如预计在2021年后调高消费税至9巴仙;调高烟草税、印花税、女佣税、排碳税等等。 研究网络假消息国会特委会召开听证会,收集民意 为研究应对网路上蓄意散播的假消息,新加坡政府从2018年3月14日至29日,国会特选委员会召开公开听证会,广纳谏言,收集公民组织意见。 但是在最后一天,也加插上演内政部长尚穆根对历史学者覃炳鑫长达六小时的”拷问“。 覃炳鑫提到1963年冷藏行动和1987年光谱逮捕行动,目的在于政治利益,而非国家安全问题,批评人民行动党和前总理李光耀,才是假新闻的散播者,引起尚穆根等人围剿。…

分享与李显扬去年合照 毕博渊期待再聚讨论家国大事

新加坡前进党准候选人毕博渊(Brad Bowyer)在昨晚分享,与总理弟弟李显扬在去年聚会的合照。 他指出,在上一次的聚会,他们深入思考和讨论新加坡的问题。也期待在第二阶段放宽后,有机会再和李显扬夫妇会面,再续启发性和批判的谈话。 “尽管来自不同背景,但我们都认同,不论政坛发生什么变化,最终都要由新加坡国民来决定他们的将来。”李显扬也转发毕博渊的贴文。 前进党在昨日(18日)向媒体公布六名准候选人:阮健平、袁麒钧、潘群勤、Sri Nallakaruppan、道菲克(MuhammadTaufik)、和毕博渊。 现年53岁的毕博渊,相信对一些网民来说并不陌生,早前就已积极参与政治事务。出生在英国,在1985年来到新加坡,后来也曾加入人民行动党。不过,他表示2011年大选后,发现社会存在许多问题,后来也辗转参与其他政党,目前是前进党党员。 至于李显扬会否从政,也受到民间期待。今年4月,李显扬曾非议行动党把它和李总理的利益凌驾于家国之上,呼吁先克服疫情,才来考虑是否举行选举。 在去年7月,李显扬也表态全心全意支持由陈清木领导的新加坡前进党。该党秘书长陈清木则表示“两人都是好友,欢迎李显扬加入该党,惟必须依据该党的条件,也要避免他人误以为是基于个人议程入党。” 在2017年,李显扬和李玮玲发表联合声明,指责哥哥李显龙在欧思礼路故居的拆除议题上,涉嫌滥用其职权和地位,来推动个人议程;使得总理随后在国会发表声明,反驳弟妹的指控。

【冠状病毒19】4月12日新增233确诊 增七感染群

续上周四(9日)本地单日新增确诊创下新高(287例),昨日(12日)也新增达233例确诊,其中多达167例仍待追踪调查感染群,51例与早前感染群有关,15例和先前病例有关联。 这已是连续第三天没有入境病例。本地累计确诊病例2千532例。 本地也新增七个感染群,其中三个为客工宿舍:大士村客工宿舍(八例)、加冷道85号客工宿舍(五例)、武吉巴督23街的吉宝客工宿舍大楼“槐舍”(Acacia Lodge,15例,已被列为第六个隔离区)、 两个感染群是餐饮场所:滨海湾金沙的潮食品牌Black Tap餐馆(八例)和麦当劳旗下四家分店(四例)。 另两个感染群为瑞士银行建筑工地(八例)和兀兰E1工业园区36号(20例)。 本地再有32人出院,累计治愈病例560例,仍有976例需留院治疗,惟其中31人病重需待在加护病房。988例康复良好惟冠毒测试仍呈阳性反应,则转移到社区隔离设施。本地已有八起死亡病例。