~by: Ghui ~

Yaw Shin Leong has been expelled from the Workers’ Party with immediate effect. In one foul swoop, he has lost both his place in a party he helped propel into victory and his role as an MP. For the foreseeable future, his political career is well and truly over.

At first blush, this move seems drastic and disproportionate. While Yaw may have appeared less than forthcoming in the allegations of marital affairs that have been levelled against him, we must remember that these alleged offenses are of a private nature. We must draw a line between duties owed to the state and duties owed to the family. As long as his duties as MP have not been compromised, that line must remain firmly in place.

However, given that the political game has been pushed up several notches post GE 2011, this is perhaps a very strategic move on the part of the Workers’ Party.

There have been many scandals of late. Accusations of corruption and a lack of accountability on the part of people in power have been rife. Singaporeans are more vocal than ever before and are crying out for blood. This is of course a positive thing but we must distinguish between necessary accountability and irrelevant information digging. 

This whole saga seems to have highlighted confusion between what is in the public interest and what should remain the private business of individuals. I am not condoning affairs but I do see a difference between private morality and public culpability.

However, I do applaud the Workers’ Party for its strategic ingenuity. Certainly, they have gauged public sentiment correctly in a way that the PAP has failed to do for many years. They have sent a very strong message to voters that it is their opinion that counts. In this, they have deferred to the public and have showed respect for the views of Singaporeans at large. The PAP on the other hand, has been perceived to protect its own and this is something that has not sat well with the public. The contrast is therefore very stark and can only serve to strengthen the Workers’ Party’s image in the eyes of Singaporeans.

Politicians have to be seen to serve public interest and public interest has deemed it fit to view Yaw’s actions as something that is incompatible with his duties as an MP. The Workers’ Party has picked up on this public sentiment and has moved to act against one of its own. In so doing, the Workers’ Party has certainly shown great political judgment and acumen. In a democracy, it is what the voters want that counts and the Workers’ Party has demonstrated where its loyalty lies. No one is indispensable or untouchable.

The political landscape has truly heated up. Unfortunately, Yaw may have been made the unwitting scapegoat for accountability.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

涉嫌台湾弃婴 情侣DNA与女婴吻合

新加坡情侣涉嫌在台湾弃婴,虽然情侣两人已经回到新加坡,但是台湾警方没有停止调查作业,新北市警局刑事监识中心的脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)鉴定报告出炉,证实两人下榻酒店的女子血迹与女婴相符。 台湾警方表示,两人血迹吻合,表示女婴曾经出现在浴室,不排除她在浴室出世的可能性。 台湾法医预计会在日内对胎盘和脐带完好无损的女婴进行解剖,已确定女婴是产前或产后死亡,再决定透过刑事局国际科,和新加坡警方取得联系。 否认女友怀孕 24岁的郭姓女子和23岁的王姓男友是在2月19日从新加坡飞往台湾游玩,到了2月26日返回新加坡。 台湾警方是在2月26日接到投报,指台湾新北市一家环保公司厨余清理车发现了一个装有女婴尸体的黑色胶袋。经过调查后,警方锁定了上述新加坡情侣,他们下榻在台北市武昌街酒店,与发现弃婴的地点相距不远。 警方也从闭路电视画面、酒店附近职员的口述中推断,一名金发男子疑手持装着弃婴的黑色胶袋,到上述地点弃尸。女子则被推断在酒店的浴室内产子。两人随后在当天下午离开台湾,回到新加坡。 两人回到新加坡后受到媒体追问有关弃婴案件,男子语气坚定地否认了女友怀孕生子一事,并表示对台湾媒体的报导感到莫名其妙。 双方家长都证实了孩子们曾经到台湾玩,但是不知道有怀孕一事,更对两人被指弃婴案件感到震惊。 呼吁情侣协助调查 台湾警方在他们下榻的酒店内采取两人的血液样本,进行脱氧核糖核酸鉴定,报告今天出炉,女子和死婴的DNA相符。 他们也希望这对情侣能再次到台湾,以便协助案件调查,提供血液样本进行比对。…

SPF Internal Affairs Office initiated investigation on allegation of police violence

Three men, all Indian Nationals in Singapore, have filed a formal complaint…

反诉总理滥用司法程序 梁实轩针对高庭裁决上诉遭三司驳回

上周五(27日),时评人梁实轩针对反告李显龙总理滥用司法程序被驳回,呈上诉庭上诉,不过上诉庭仍维持高庭裁决,梁实轩上诉失败。 当时,梁实轩也在脸书分享,经过一个半小时聆讯,他的代表律师为其口头辩论,而总理代表律师文达星则未参与,上诉庭最终驳回他的上诉。 文达星原本要求讼费2万3000元,惟最终上诉庭裁定,梁需支付李显龙总理两万元诉讼费。 大法官梅达顺、上诉庭法官潘文龙和朱迪柏拉卡斯(Judith Prakash)组成上诉庭三司,聆听林鼎代表梁实轩作出上诉陈情。 只因分享一则脸书贴文,梁实轩在去年11月被总理提告诽谤,为此他由代表律师林鼎,在去年12月底反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。 不过,高庭法官Aedit Abdullah在今年三月裁决,驳回梁实轩的反诉,指后者“没有合理的诉讼理由”。 林鼎在27日的聆讯上,也辩解到总理采取诽谤诉讼保护其政府声誉,但这也容易对言论自由产生寒蝉效应;再者,分享有关诽谤文章的有上万人,但只有梁实轩一人被起诉。他认为,总理似乎高度选择性地决定谁将被提告,而矛头就指向一个多年来撰写了2000多篇文章,以批评政府著称的人。 不过,梅达顺则认为,林鼎应知道民事法中原告可选择诉讼的形式;且即便对方是公众人物,法庭也不能限制受害者诉诸法庭的权益。 梅达顺称对于卷入诉讼的被告,提控被诽谤的原告,他表示感到“不明所以”(could not…

妇女指单位有问题 投诉没人理! 建屋局等单位澄清

妇女在社媒上投诉单位出现漏水及污水、发出恶臭现象,向建屋发展局投诉后没有下文,当局昨日强调“绝无此事”。 建屋局指出,该妇女自2015年首次就有关现象进行投诉,当局也到现场展开多次调查。“调查显示,排污系统或其他部位并没有任何瑕疵,不可能导致单位内出现恶臭……新加坡公用事业局(PUB)也到单位进行水质检测,结果显示水可以安全饮用。” 杰拉尔丁(Geraldine Tang)女士是于本月4日在脸书上帖文,指在其邻居使用厕所后,她所居住的私人组屋(DBSS)内就充满了恶臭。 她在帖文内附上了单位照片,包括一间浴室,指该浴室“近乎24小时又臭又热……五年来的上下楼层的高温、虫子和湿气已经严重将它损坏” 。 在杰拉尔丁的长篇帖文中,她投诉在邻居打开空调或热水器时,她家的卧室的地板就会变得“又冷又湿”,而且自来水内的细菌也引起了她的皮肤问题。 据建屋局和公用事业局指出,杰拉尔丁女士曾经在之前的两件住家做出类似投诉。而目前,她居住在勿洛蓄水池湾一带的百丽湾。 建屋局在脸书发帖指出,当局已就有关投诉展开调查,所有的配件和材料都是正确的。“负责杰拉尔丁女士住家的室内空气素质调查专家指出,因为室内门窗处于关闭状况,导致通风不良以及室内高温高湿。” “我们还察觉到,室内地板和墙壁都被多个清洁化学品清理和消毒过。专家指出,室内微生物的生长可能是因通风不良和长期过度清洗所致。” “但是,该名女士没有听从专家建议,让单位通风。” 建屋局建议居民不要使用过量自来水清洗单位,应该使用湿布擦拭墙壁上的污垢污渍,在清理地板后打开窗户,保持通风。…