the following are Minister of State for National Development, Tan Chuan-Jin's notes on Bukit Brown from his Facebook:


We just had a briefing and discussion on Bukit Brown. This was an opportunity to share our considerations behind the issue of the road, which I had announced in Parliament on 5th March, and to also listen to the views held by many who are passionate on the heritage and history of the place. 

Understandably, our decision to proceed with the construction of the road has caused disappointment to those who want to conserve Bukit Brown. I want to give assurance to those who have been giving us their views on this matter that the decision has not been an easy one. While we have not been able to fully accommodate their wishes, we have taken many of their views into consideration. For instance, the decision to embark on a serious documentation of the affected graves was a result of advice we received from friends from the heritage society. LTA has also factored in feedback in their design of the road to minimise impact to the cemetery, hydrology and biodiversity.
 
Going forward, we need to continue with these conversations. For example, we are now looking at working with interested stakeholders on public outreach to commemorate the history and heritage of Bukit Brown even as we continue with work on documentation.
 
(Note 2) It is illuminating to read the statement issued by the various groups.
 
Yesterday's session on Bukit Brown was never intended to be the type of dialogue desired and claimed by these groups. Nor was it a response to their earlier request. 
 
I had explained that our intent was simply to share with a range of stakeholders on some of the background information and considerations we had previously shared with other groups and to also highlight the road plans which were being announced. It was not a consultation effort to debate about whether the road would be built or not. That has already been stated in Parliament. We were announcing the details, alignment etc. 
 
However, it was clear that it did not matter. Because we failed to conduct a session that was in line with what they wanted e.g. to have their own briefs, to invite others on their invite list, it was deemed to be an inadequate effort at genuine engagement.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

GE2020 Results: PAP wins Jalan Besar GRC with 65.37% of the vote

Jalan Besar GRC has been officially called for People’s Action Party (PAP)…

“IKO Oats Cracker with Muesli” recalled due to small piece of plastic wire found

The Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority (AVA) has announced a recall of “IKO…

Indranee Rajah: Right time to increase water charges as necessary measure to ensure future supplies

Senior Minister of State for Finance Indranee Rajah stressed that this is…

两周内第二起!宏茂桥发生火灾疑个人代步工具爆炸

宏茂桥组屋昨日下午(22日)发生火患,疑似由个人代步工具(PMD)所引起。 据民防部队所发出的文告表示,火灾地点在宏茂桥1道第224座组屋,民防部队约下午3:05接获通报后立即前往救灾。 抵达现场后发现火势严重,民防队控制火势。同时,民防队员亦将一名成人与三名小孩救出,另60名居民则由警方与民防部队疏散至安全区域。 据《海峡时报》报道,火灾缘由由个人代步工具引起,当时屋主在上班前,于厨房内为个人代步工具充电。然而,下午2-3点左右,屋主法兹(译名)与法兹林(译名)当时于屋内听到巨响。 “我当时正在客厅打游戏,在厨房充电的个人代步工具突然爆炸,然后瞬间着火,我马上跑去叫醒正在睡觉的弟弟,立刻疏散。火势迅速蔓延,就像立刻到我眼前” 法兹忆起。 近日频频发生因个人代步工具引起火患的意外,上周四(18日)武吉巴督组屋凌晨失火,当时救出一名男子与一名女子,而男子经抢救后仍不幸离世。经初步调查,相信火患意外的源头与屋内的电动个人代步工具有关。他们也在屋内找到三辆被烧毁的电动踏板车。 一直都有使用个人代步工具的习惯,对爆炸原因不清 据《海峡时报》记者了解,该个人代步工具属于法兹妹妹的未婚夫,他透露自己拥有个人代步工具已有两年,一直以来均以个人代步工具外送食物,所以并不清楚个人代步工具爆炸的原因。 法兹的母亲则表示,“这是一件很不幸的事,以往个人代步工具一直都没问题”。火灾当时,母亲并不在屋内。 火势一直蔓延至隔壁两个单位的外墙,外墙已烧焦,同时也损毁其中一个单位的电线,导致屋内断电,屋主与其妻儿受困于内,只能等待消防员的到来。 屋主莫哈默德(译名)表示,“当时屋内断电,我和我的妻儿非常害怕…