~ By Tan Kin Lian ~

Is this a local election to elect a Member of Parliament to represent a constituency or a mini referendum on the performance of the PAP Government?

In my view, it is both; and more inclined towards the latter.

Local election
Both candidates have good points and deserve the support of the voters.

Desmond Choo of the Peoples’ Action Party has been working hard and “wearing his socks out”. He has also promised to continue to work in the constituency, even if he is not elected in this round.  He does get good media coverage – which is a benefit of contesting under the PAP banner.

Png Eng Huat of the Workers Party has been working in the grassroots in Hougang for five years. I know of this fact, as he was my former colleague. I know Png to be reliable, helpful and friendly.  He may appear to be “low key” but I watched a video of his speech at the previous general election – and he talked sense!

Whoever wins on 26 May will be a win for Hougang voters.

Mini Referendum
I expect that this by-election will be a mini referendum on the performance of the PAP Government over the year since the 2011 general election.

Positive Points
Here are the positive points that voters can give credit to the Government
1. It carried out a salary review of government ministers and implemented a cut of one third of their previous salaries. Link.
2. It accelerated the building of HDB flats. When completed in a few years time, the new supply is likely to moderate or reduce the cost of HDB flats. Link.
3. It reduced the issue of work passes for foreign workers and declined to renew some existing passes. Link.
4. It invested $1.1 billion to provide more buses for public transport. Link
5. It launched the Financial Advisory Industry Review to look into consumer issues in the finance sector. Link
6. It promised to review the insurance schemes for medical and long term care. Link

These are commendable efforts, although many critics were able to find fault with the pace, extent and direction of these initiatives.

Negative Points
I give demerit points to the Government on the following issues.
1. It refused to amend the Internal Security Act, in spite of a similar act being abolished in Malaysia. Link
2. It delayed the calling of the Hougang by-election unnecessarily, which prompted a resident to take this matter to court. Link
3. It appeared to be rather weak, depending on a few experienced ministers to look after several key ministries and to rely on new ministers that are inexperienced in their portfolios.
4. It refused to recognise the flaws in past policies that caused the bad outcomes, and to make fundamental changes, preferring instead to “tweak” the ineffective policies.

My vote
If I were a voter in Hougang (and I am not), I would place my vote for the Workers Party. It is important to pass a message to the PAP Government that several existing policies need a fundamental review and change. They should also change their style of government and be prepared to listen more to the “common sense” of the people in deciding on the future direction of Singapore.

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

A critic turned supporter of President Nathan

Jason Lee/ For almost 12 years, I have never been a fan…

以居民护鸡事件为题材 本地导演短片却无缘在新民阁首映

本地新锐导演张俊峰为新民阁居民拍摄短片《新民》,却遭居民委会拒绝,无缘在新民阁首映。 《新民》短片以新民阁曾引起的争议野鸡为题材,短片内以本地语言特色为主,刻画一名65岁独居老妇与新民阁组屋楼下的野鸡作伴的日子。 去年,因当局收到多宗投诉后,欲捕杀掉这些居住在该区的鸡群,新民阁(Sin Ming Court)为是否要让原鸡(red jungle fowl)继续在该社区栖息,进行投票。 逾千居民中,有90巴仙的人支持不干扰鸡群,让他们继续“住下去”。根据投票结果显示,居民们决定继续和鸡群和平相处,同时保住了这些鸡群的栖息地。 大多数居民认为鸡并不会干扰他们的生活,但清晨鸡啼扰梦,多少会让人困扰。 新民阁居民保留鸡群,本地导演获灵感拍摄 导演张峻峰对于居民们集体善举而感动,决定借此题材,将新民阁人与野鸡和平共处的现象拍摄下来。他向《海峡时报》透露,“在2017年时,当我知道当局因为20多通的居民通报而决定要扑杀鸡群时,我感到相当愤怒” 因此他当时想象有个居民为了拯救鸡群而在社区内跑来跑去,捕捉这些鸡拯救它们,后续才将这些想象延伸为短片。…

$50 million programme to drive innovation of Changi Airport over the next five years

Changi Airport has announced that its operations will be set to change…

“只有生病才要戴口罩!“ 大叔不戴口罩大谈”伟论“

大叔不戴口罩四处走,还与贩卖口罩的工作人员谈论自己的“伟论”,指戴口罩不合理,只有生病才需要戴口罩。 一名男网友在脸书上发布一段短片,可见一名大叔不戴着口罩四处走,他在帖文中也指出,每天都会在店门口看见有人不带口罩,这些人还声称忘记戴口罩,也有部分人则是拒绝戴上口罩。 相信事件是在勿洛巴士转换站发生。而拍摄者则相信是贩卖口罩的工作人员。 短片中的大叔衣衫不整站在柜台前,不仅是口罩也没戴上,连衣服的纽扣也没扣上,还对着掌镜人大谈自己的“伟论”,指口罩是给生病的人戴,不明白为什么一个“健康的人”要戴口罩。 大叔表示,“生病才会戴上口罩,我不明白我们健康的人为什么要戴口罩,不合理,我不喜欢。” 他甚至表示,没生病戴口罩,是“滑稽”“愚蠢”的行为,他不喜欢。 短片在网络流传,惟不久后被撤下了,但也引来许多网友关注,网友纷纷表示疫情爆发至今,已有一段时间,戴口罩是社会责任,降低感染率,因此对大叔的伟论相当无言。 也有网友表示拍摄者不应该将视频发到网络上进行网络公审,若看见老人未戴上口罩,或许是因为忘记或其他原因,只要好意告知便可。 还有网友搞笑表示,大叔“真诚以待”向拍摄者大谈自己的伟论,却不知被拍摄,还被发到网上,相信现在应该后悔不已。 尽管如今已经进入第二阶段解封措施,但民众也仍不可掉以轻心,截至目前,离开家门不戴口罩的初犯者会被罚款300元,重犯者则罚1000元。 卫生部长颜金勇曾在第一阶段解封措施时表示,戴面罩固然能起到一些防护作用,但与口罩不同的是,面罩和脸部之间留有一定距离,因此飞沫仍有可能溅出。因此民众必须继续戴口罩 不可再以面罩作为替代品。