~By Foo Jun Kai ~

As a 20 year old Hougang resident who cannot exercise his right to vote in the upcoming by-election (due to the voting age in Singapore not being in line with many developed countries as the government knows that allowing those between the age of 18-21 to vote is not advantageous to them), I thought the least I can do is to pen my thoughts.

Please help to share this if you know of Hougang voters in your friends list. One criticism of Singaporeans is that we whine so much about the government but ironically, we are the creators of our own unhappiness as we are the one who voted for the government we have. Well, at least 60.4% of us, but Hougang residents have been bucking this trend for the past 20 years. 

The government has tried to frame this by-election as a 'local' election rather than a 'national' election. Residents in Opposition wards have been discriminated over the years. The PAP government has politicised supposedly 'neutral' organisations such as the PA and HDB. For those who don't know, losing PAP candidates stay on in Opposition wards as grassroots advisers. 

Instead of our elected Opposition MPs, the grassroots advisers are the ones who announce lift upgrading in Opposition wards. 

When a Hougang resident contacted HDB to repair a leaking toilet pipe, he was told to get the PAP grassroots adviser to request for a subsidy from HDB. 

When Opposition MPs want to organise events in their own constituency, they have to get approval from the PA if the piece of land belongs to the PA. 

When residents organise events and wish to invite their MPs, they are told they have to invite the grassroots advisers instead. 

As we all know, Opposition wards are placed at the back of the queue for upgrading programmes even though the funds come from all taxpayers. In 2011, PM Lee justified that "there has to be a distinction because the PAP wards supported the Government and the policies which delivered these good things." So how can elections be solely 'local' and not 'national'? 

In 2012, PM Lee justified that it is his discretion whether or not to call for a by-election because in our Westminster system of parliamentary government, voters not only choose candidates but also the party to form the government. So how can elections by solely 'local' and not 'national'? 

Going by this line of thinking, voting for an MP is also a referendum on the government policies and views, which include issues such as the ISA, Lim Chong Yah's wage proposal, and the need to continuously expand our population. These are issues the ruling party has refused to budge on. 

We, the citizens of Hougang SMC, pay the same taxes and suffer the same two year delay (NS) in our education, career, life, and future as any other citizens in other constituencies. 

DPM Tharman has said that the WP takes elections lightly. Now, who is the one who takes elections lightly? We have been disrespected by the ruling party who put in their own grassroots advisers instead of OUR OWN ELECTED MPs.

To voters of Hougang SMC, if you truly believe in equality, please continue voting for the WP. The only way to stop all these things that are so wrong with the system is to have more and more opposition wards over the next few General Elections, till this government realises that they cannot continue in their approach of discriminating against their own citizens. Please think hard before you cast your vote on 26th May 2012.

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

You May Also Like

Focus on Healthcare: Who pays and whose responsibility?

In his National Day Rally speech, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced…

李玮玲公开2013年柯金梨和父亲往来电邮 内容讨论遗嘱事宜

已故建国总理李光耀的女儿李玮玲,今早在个人脸书公布一则誌期2013年12月12日的电邮。有关电邮是由李和李律师事务所的柯金梨致函给李光耀,内容提及平分遗产事宜。 李玮玲在贴文中指责,其兄长一再指责其兄嫂,即李显扬妻子林学芬有份参与并促使父亲李光耀签署2013年12月的遗嘱。 “柯金梨否认参与2013年遗嘱,这都是虚假的,柯金梨一直在撒谎,她也违背了对他客户即我父亲的职责。” 她重申李和李律师事务所一直都是父亲的私人事务律师,协助处理包括遗嘱、授权书和医疗照护事前指示(AMD)。 “事实是父亲在签署2013年12月遗嘱前,对于他想修改的事宜和柯金梨有深入讨论。从2013年11月底直到12月13日,父亲就他的遗嘱内容,以电邮往来和柯金梨讨论。” 她指出,和柯金梨在此前的讨论,都反映在父亲在2013年12月17日签署的遗嘱,正是父亲想要的,平分给所有子女,也是父亲和母亲及所有人一致同意的。 李玮玲也表示,此次公开的只是父亲与柯金梨其中一则讨论2013年12月遗嘱的电邮,“还有更多,”不过她未明言还有更多是否意味着仍会继续公开更多内容和档案。 李和李律师事务所的合伙人,也是柯玉芝侄女的柯金梨,曾在去年2017年向《海峡时报》表示,自己没有参与最终遗嘱的订立。 约两周前(4月15日)李玮玲就曾在个人脸书发文抨击,近期媒体报导不断重复哥哥李显龙总理,对李显扬的“不实且可耻的指控”(false and dishonourable allegations),指后者涉及诈欺父亲以在遗嘱中获得更多份额。…

SPH: We welcome Govt’s draft legislation to deal with online “fake news”

In a statement published by the Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) today (4…

马海事局证实 找到失踪男子划艇

新加坡女商人潘玉珍及男团员陈永顺划独木舟失踪,至今日已进入第五天,据了解,马来西亚海事局证实,有渔夫找到属于失踪男子划艇。 马国海事局称,四名渔夫今早在彭亨的关丹港口丹戎格朗(Tanjong Gelang)发现失踪的划艇,当局宜派出搜救人员在附近海域搜寻失踪者。 马来西亚搜救单位再投入三架直升机,协助进行搜寻任务。加入空中搜索的包括2架来自大马海事执法机构的直升机,及一架来自警方的直升机。 在海上搜寻方面,主力则为九艘来自大马各单位的船艇,包括一艘海军舰、一艘海事执法机构船舰、3艘海事执法机构快艇、2艘水警快艇及2艘消拯局快艇。 马国海事执法机构今日发表文告表示,空中搜寻范围维持900平方海哩,而海面搜救范围则维持600平方海哩。 参与搜救任务的人员达122人,附近海域渔民也自发参与搜救。 52岁的陈英顺(译音)和64岁的潘玉珍乘着连假出游,到柔佛丰盛港参加独木舟泛舟活动,但之后不知所踪,至今马国海事执法机构的搜救工作仍在进行中。 他们和另外13人,于前日从直落慕桑(Teluk kesang)划艇到磨当岛(Pulau  Mertang )。不过,队友过后在傍晚时分发现,共划一艘双人艇的两人已经掉队。马国海事执法机构在本月9日下午接获投报,事发时两位失踪者共乘一艘亮绿色的皮艇。…