Commentaries
The Revival of the Kallang Roar
![](https://theonlinecitizen.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/uploads/2015/06/27072106/maxresdefault.jpg)
By Ariffin Sha
The Kallang Roar. You could almost imagine a middle aged man saying those three words with a sigh and a glimmer of wonder in his eyes as he recalls the glory days. The glory days, where teams who stood in the tunnel of the old National Stadium waiting to face the Lions were genuinely scared. They were scared, as they knew they were in the Lion’s Den. Forget the 12th Men, the Kallang Roar was a different entity altogether.
The 2008 film entitled ‘Kallang Roar‘ did manage to capture some of the sheer brilliance of the Kallang Roar during the 1977 Malaysia Cup triumph when our Lions were lead by arguably the best Singaporean coach in the history of football, Mr Choo Seng Kwee, or Uncle Choo as he was more affectionately known as.
Many say the Kallang Roar is a thing of the past. There are a few reasons for this assertion. The demolition of the old National Staidum and the decline of the state of local football are a few popular arguments. Prima facie, this does seem to be true. However, a group of fans beg to differ.
These fans do concede that support for our Lions have dwindled, but they do firmly believe that the Kallang Roar can most certainly be revived. I had a chat with Norman, one of the founders of ExcluSinga recently and he shared with me more about the group.
Origins
ExcluSinga’s founding can be traced back to 2012 where a group of about 30 fans travelled together to support the Lions XII in the Malaysian Super League (MSL). These fans had the back of the Lions, even in the most hostile of stadiums in Malaysia and their support never wavered.
Most of them travelled with the Lions as they wanted to relive the “romance of the Malaysia Cup.” As their numbers grew, they also began to support the Courts Young Lions in the S-League and the National Team in international friendlies and tournaments like the AFF Suzuki Cup.
From a small group of 30 fans, they now even have a Facebook Page with close to 20,000 followers. Go to any game and you’ll never fail to spot them. With their banner being displayed prominently and their never ending vocal support, they really do create a great atmosphere for the Lions. When I watched our Lions beat the Philippines during their first match of the SEA Games at Jalan Besar Stadium, I couldn’t help but bob my head and sing along to their extremely catchy chants which put many recent national day songs to shame.
“Red is my Blood, White is my Soul”
When he saw videos of ExlcuSinga’s chants being circulated around Facebook yesterday, Mr Subramaniam remarked:
“Spontaneous ground up initiatives like these somehow have more spirit in them than the soulless top-down attempts at imposing national ‘songs’.”
My personal favorite cheer from ExcluSinga. A simple, straightforward and fun cheer. I sincerely hope that this cheer is spread far and wide as it undoubtedly be inspiring, both for us and the boys, to hear a whole stadium sing this together.
This second cheer, entitled ‘Satu Singapura’ is also a pretty fun cheer. The cheer is in Malay but we have provided an English translation which can be read at this link. As you hear the beat of the drum and the unity in their voices, it is close to impossible not to sing along in the Stadium. For even the most cynical amongst us, it is hard not to be moved by such powerful chants.
I do hope these cheers spread far and wide as it is certainly an effective way to spur Team Singapore on. If you have the privilege to attend a football match live, you’ll learn that ExcluSinga does have an entire arsenal of chants which can be deployed accordingly depending on how the Lions are playing on the pitch. The have chants of celebration, chants that remind the Lions to keep their chin up when things aren’t going so well and chants that inspire the Lions to go that extra mile. The only thing that is out of their reach, is silence.
Even when the odds are stacked against our Lions, these fans are out in full force. The Lions may be defeated on the pitch, but these fans will never be defeated in spirit. When I asked Norman what keeps them going even through the darkest of times, he proudly replied:
“In order for a ream to excel in victory and rise from a defeat, they need motivation. They need that fire to ignite their determination to perform – to go at it again. And thats exactly what we are here for, to be the catalyst for our boys to fight for the badge and fight for the flag that they represent.”
To the inevitable question of whether the Kallang Roar can be revived, he responded confidently without skipping a beat:
“The Kallang Roar is an urban legend, and it’s about time for it be reincarnated. For years, the Lion of Kallang has been asleep. The Kallang Roar shall return and we must make it happen.”
I was in full agreement with Norman on the fact that if the Kallang Roar was to ever return, it is Singaporeans who must make it happen. The FAS and the players have a role to play but we too must do our part. From the smallest of ways like encouraging our kids to play football to supporting your local team at S-League matches and the national team, we can make the Kallang Roar return. We can awaken the Lion of Kallang.
We do seem to be heading in the right direction and the future definitely does look bright. Two weeks ago, the LionsXII team beat Kelantan 3 – 1 and made history by being the first foreign team to lift the FA Cup in a match where they fought real hard for victory. On Monday, when the Lions opened their SEA Games campaign with a victory over Philippines where a young Irfan Fandi dazzled the crowd, Jalan Besar Stadium was a sea of red as the stadium was sold out.
I also note with pleasure that when our Lions take on Myanmar tonight, it will also be in front of a Jalan Besar that is packed to the brim. The match will also be broadcasted live so do catch it from your homes if you can. I also can’t wait to experience the atmosphere when we pack the National Stadium, which has almost seven times the capacity of the Jalan Besar Stadium.
On a parting note, Norman had this to say to the players and Singapore at large,
“You are not a Lion just because you look or play like one but because you roar like one. As the late Uncle Choo once said, “A lion can never be defeated, and you shall die fighting. Roar for Singapore!””
And Roar for Singapore, we shall.
TOC would like to wish our Lions all the very best for their SEA Games Campaign and we hope that more Singaporeans, following in the trail blazed by Exclusinga, will step up to support our Lions in full force. And one day in the near future, Kallang will roar again.
![](https://theonlinecitizen.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/uploads/2023/03/26202010/TOC_newlogo_small.webp)
Commentaries
Lim Tean criticizes Govt’s rejection of basic income report, urges Singaporeans to rethink election choices
Lim Tean, leader of Peoples Voice (PV), criticizes the government’s defensive response to the basic living income report, accusing it of avoiding reality.
He calls on citizens to assess affordability and choose MPs who can truly enhance their lives in the upcoming election.
SINGAPORE: A recently published report, “Minimum Income Standard 2023: Household Budgets in a Time of Rising Costs,” unveils figures detailing the necessary income households require to maintain a basic standard of living, using the Minimum Income Standard (MIS) method.
The newly released study, spearheaded by Dr Ng Kok Hoe of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) specifically focuses on working-age households in 2021 and presents the latest MIS budgets, adjusted for inflation from 2020 to 2022.
The report detailed that:
- The “reasonable starting point” for a living wage in Singapore was S$2,906 a month.
- A single parent with a child aged two to six required S$3,218 per month.
- Partnered parents with two children, one aged between seven and 12 and the other between 13 and 18, required S$6,426 a month.
- A single elderly individual required S$1,421 a month.
- Budgets for both single and partnered parent households averaged around S$1,600 per member. Given recent price inflation, these figures have risen by up to 5% in the current report.
Singapore Govt challenges MIS 2023 report’s representation of basic needs
Regrettably, on Thursday (14 Sept), the Finance Ministry (MOF), Manpower Ministry (MOM), and Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) jointly issued a statement dismissing the idea suggested by the report, claiming that minimum household income requirements amid inflation “might not accurately reflect basic needs”.
Instead, they claimed that findings should be seen as “what individuals would like to have.”, and further defended their stances for the Progressive Wage Model (PWM) and other measures to uplift lower-wage workers.
The government argued that “a universal wage floor is not necessarily the best way” to ensure decent wages for lower-wage workers.
The government’s statement also questions the methodology of the Minimum Income Standards (MIS) report, highlighting limitations such as its reliance on respondent profiles and group dynamics.
“The MIS approach used is highly dependent on respondent profiles and on group dynamics. As the focus groups included higher-income participants, the conclusions may not be an accurate reflection of basic needs.”
The joint statement claimed that the MIS approach included discretionary expenditure items such as jewellery, perfumes, and overseas holidays.
Lim Tean slams Government’s response to basic living income report
In response to the government’s defensive reaction to the recent basic living income report, Lim Tean, leader of the alternative party Peoples Voice (PV), strongly criticizes the government’s apparent reluctance to confront reality, stating, “It has its head buried in the sand”.
He strongly questioned the government’s endorsement of the Progressive Wage Model (PWM) as a means to uplift the living standards of the less fortunate in Singapore, describing it as a misguided approach.
In a Facebook video on Friday (15 Sept), Lim Tean highlighted that it has become a global norm, especially in advanced and first-world countries, to establish a minimum wage, commonly referred to as a living wage.
“Everyone is entitled to a living wage, to have a decent life, It is no use boasting that you are one of the richest countries in the world that you have massive reserves, if your citizens cannot have a decent life with a decent living wage.”
Lim Tean cited his colleague, Leong Sze Hian’s calculations, which revealed a staggering 765,800 individuals in Singapore, including Permanent Residents and citizens, may not earn the recommended living wage of $2,906, as advised by the MIS report.
“If you take away the migrant workers or the foreign workers, and take away those who do not work, underage, are children you know are unemployed, and the figure is staggering, isn’t it?”
“You know you are looking at a very substantial percentage of the workforce that do not have sufficient income to meet basic needs, according to this report.”
He reiterated that the opposition parties, including the People’s Voice and the People’s Alliance, have always called for a minimum wage, a living wage which the government refuses to countenance.
Scepticism about the government’s ability to control rising costs
In a time of persistently high inflation, Lim Tean expressed skepticism about the government’s ability to control rising costs.
He cautioned against believing in predictions of imminent inflation reduction and lower interest rates below 2%, labeling them as unrealistic.
Lim Tean urged Singaporeans to assess their own affordability in these challenging times, especially with the impending GST increase.
He warned that a 1% rise in GST could lead to substantial hikes in everyday expenses, particularly food prices.
Lim Tean expressed concern that the PAP had become detached from the financial struggles of everyday Singaporeans, citing their high salaries and perceived insensitivity to the common citizen’s plight.
Lim Tean urges Singaporeans to rethink election choices
Highlighting the importance of the upcoming election, Lim Tean recommended that citizens seriously evaluate the affordability of their lives.
“If you ask yourself about affordability, you will realise that you have no choice, In the coming election, but to vote in a massive number of opposition Members of Parliament, So that they can make a difference.”
Lim Tean emphasized the need to move beyond the traditional notion of providing checks and balances and encouraged voters to consider who could genuinely improve their lives.
“To me, the choice is very simple. It is whether you decide to continue with a life, that is going to become more and more expensive: More expensive housing, higher cost of living, jobs not secure because of the massive influx of foreign workers,” he declared.
“Or you choose members of Parliament who have your interests at heart and who want to make your lives better.”
Commentaries
Political observers call for review of Singapore’s criteria of Presidential candidates and propose 5 year waiting period for political leaders
Singaporean political observers express concern over the significantly higher eligibility criteria for private-sector presidential candidates compared to public-sector candidates, calling for adjustments.
Some also suggest a five year waiting period for aspiring political leaders after leaving their party before allowed to partake in the presidential election.
Notably, The Workers’ Party has earlier reiterated its position that the current qualification criteria favor PAP candidates and has called for a return to a ceremonial presidency instead of an elected one.
While the 2023 Presidential Election in Singapore concluded on Friday (1 September), discussions concerning the fairness and equity of the electoral system persist.
Several political observers contend that the eligibility criteria for private-sector individuals running for president are disproportionately high compared to those from the public sector, and they propose that adjustments be made.
They also recommend a five-year waiting period for aspiring political leaders after leaving their party before being allowed to participate in the presidential election.
Aspiring entrepreneur George Goh Ching Wah, announced his intention to in PE 2023 in June. However, His application as a candidate was unsuccessful, he failed to receive the Certificate of Eligibility (COE) on 18 August.
Mr Goh had expressed his disappointment in a statement after the ELD’s announcement, he said, the Presidential Elections Committee (PEC) took a very narrow interpretation of the requirements without explaining the rationale behind its decision.
As per Singapore’s Constitution, individuals running for the presidency from the private sector must have a minimum of three years’ experience as a CEO in a company.
This company should have consistently maintained an average shareholders’ equity of at least S$500 million and sustained profitability.
Mr Goh had pursued eligibility through the private sector’s “deliberative track,” specifically referring to section 19(4)(b)(2) of the Singapore Constitution.
He pointed out five companies he had led for over three years, collectively claiming a shareholders’ equity of S$1.521 billion.
Notably, prior to the 2016 revisions, the PEC might have had the authority to assess Mr Goh’s application similarly to how it did for Mr Tan Jee Say in the 2011 Presidential Election.
Yet, in its current formulation, the PEC is bound by the definitions laid out in the constitution.
Calls for equitable standards across public and private sectors
According to Singapore’s Chinese media outlet, Shin Min Daily News, Dr Felix Tan Thiam Kim, a political analyst at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore, noted that in 2016, the eligibility criteria for private sector candidates were raised from requiring them to be executives of companies with a minimum capital of S$100 million to CEOs of companies with at least S$500 million in shareholder equity.
However, the eligibility criteria for public sector candidates remained unchanged. He suggests that there is room for adjusting the eligibility criteria for public sector candidates.
Associate Professor Bilver Singh, Deputy Head of the Department of Political Science at the National University of Singapore, believes that the constitutional requirements for private-sector individuals interested in running are excessively stringent.
He remarked, “I believe it is necessary to reassess the relevant regulations.”
He points out that the current regulations are more favourable for former public officials seeking office and that the private sector faces notably greater challenges.
“While it may be legally sound, it may not necessarily be equitable,” he added.
Proposed five-year waiting period for political leaders eyeing presidential race
Moreover, despite candidates severing ties with their political parties in pursuit of office, shedding their political affiliations within a short timeframe remains a challenging endeavour.
A notable instance is Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, who resigned from the People’s Action Party (PAP) just slightly over a month before announcing his presidential candidacy, sparking considerable debate.
During a live broadcast, his fellow contender, Ng Kok Song, who formerly served as the Chief Investment Officer of GIC, openly questioned Mr Tharman’s rapid transition to a presidential bid shortly after leaving his party and government.
Dr Felix Tan suggests that in the future, political leaders aspiring to run for the presidency should not only resign from their parties but also adhere to a mandatory waiting period of at least five years before entering the race.
Cherian George and Kevin Y.L. Tan: “illogical ” to raise the corporate threshold in 2016
Indeed, the apprehension regarding the stringent eligibility criteria and concerns about fairness in presidential candidacy requirements are not limited to political analysts interviewed by Singapore’s mainstream media.
Prior to PE2023, CCherian George, a Professor of media studies at Hong Kong Baptist University, and Kevin Y.L. Tan, an Adjunct Professor at both the Faculty of Law of the National University of Singapore and the NTU’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), brought attention to the challenges posed by the qualification criteria for candidates vying for the Singaporean Presidency.
In their article titled “Why Singapore’s Next Elected President Should be One of its Last,” the scholars discussed the relevance of the current presidential election system in Singapore and floated the idea of returning to an appointed President, emphasizing the symbolic and unifying role of the office.
They highlighted that businessman George Goh appeared to be pursuing the “deliberative track” for qualification, which requires candidates to satisfy the PEC that their experience and abilities are comparable to those of a typical company’s chief executive with shareholder equity of at least S$500 million.
Mr Goh cobbles together a suite of companies under his management to meet the S$500m threshold.
The article also underscored the disparities between the eligibility criteria for candidates from the public and private sectors, serving as proxies for evaluating a candidate’s experience in handling complex financial matters.
“It is hard to see what financial experience the Chairman of the Public Service Commission or for that matter, the Chief Justice has, when compared to a Minister or a corporate chief.”
“The raising of the corporate threshold in 2016 is thus illogical and serves little purpose other than to simply reduce the number of potentially eligible candidates.”
The article also touches upon the issue of candidates’ independence from political parties, particularly the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP).
It mentions that candidates are expected to be non-partisan and independent, and it questions how government-backed candidates can demonstrate their independence given their previous affiliations.
The Workers’ Party advocate for a return to a ceremonial presidency
It comes as no surprise that Singapore’s alternative party, the Workers’ Party, reaffirmed its stance on 30 August, asserting that they believe the existing qualifying criteria for presidential candidates are skewed in favour of those approved by the People’s Action Party (PAP).
They argue that the current format of the elected presidency (EP) undermines the principles of parliamentary democracy.
“It also serves as an unnecessary source of gridlock – one that could potentially cripple a non-PAP government within its first term – and is an alternative power centre that could lead to political impasses.”
Consistently, the Workers’ Party has been vocal about its objection to the elected presidency and has consistently called for its abolition.
Instead, they advocate for a return to a ceremonial presidency, a position they have maintained for over three decades.
-
Singapore3 days ago
Singapore woman’s suicide amidst legal battle raises concerns over legal system
-
Diplomacy6 days ago
India PM Narendra Modi meets with PM Lawrence Wong; Four MoUs signed
-
Opinion1 week ago
Singaporean voters and the ‘Battered Wife Syndrome’
-
Parliament2 days ago
PAP MPs attack WP Gerald Giam in Parliament over NTUC independence from ruling party
-
Politics5 days ago
PAP adopts SDP policies after criticizing them: Dr Chee urges Singaporeans to see through tactics
-
Food6 days ago
NTU stall food prices questioned after parent pays S$6.30 for meal
-
Parliament23 hours ago
Minister Shanmugam rejects request for detailed information on visa-free visitor offences: Cites bilateral considerations
-
Civil Society1 week ago
CIVICUS Monitor labels Singapore as ‘repressed’ for crackdown on civic freedoms