Community
The dream of Singapore 2.0 – an essay for SG50
![](https://theonlinecitizen.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/uploads/2015/07/27071058/My-Sg-My-Future-contest-skyline-Wikipedia.jpg)
I always dream of Singapore 2.0. This dream is not something new – it is one that is shared. It’s a dream shared by greats like Lim Chin Siong, JB Jeya, Chiam See Tong and Chia Thye Poh. Many who dreamed it may not live to see the dream materialize, but the glimmer of hope that Singapore 2.0 will come to be is enough to keep the dreamers’ fight alive.
The education system would be a good place to start. In Singapore 2.0, there is no streaming. Every class has a nice mix of talents. When you fail exams, it doesn’t reflect on your intelligence, because in Singapore 2.0, we recognise multiple types of intelligence. Reviewing social studies textbooks once every couple of years may be a hassle, but it ensures that young minds know the Singapore story in its entirety, not just the narrative the powers that be feed. We’re also taught how to think critically – one of the biggest tools which help us put the right people in power. In Singapore 2.0, our education system will be one that will make the Scandinavians green with envy.
Next, National Service. In Singapore 2.0, there is still NS. We wanted to do away with it, but the world has yet to learn the value of peace. Therefore, we retain it while breathing more flexibility into it. Inspired by sporting legends of the past like Shanti Pereria and Joseph Schooling, deferment is available for those who excel in sports. In line with multiple intelligence, we also allow deferment for those who excel in music and the academically inclined too. Women too, spearheaded by AWARE’s fire to play a larger role in society, serve NS as nurses.
In the working world, the unemployment wage makes young Singaporeans less afraid about pursuing their true passions. BY law, no one should work more than 37 hours a week, which allowed us to spend more time with loved ones. Through the laws, we have managed to kill two birds with a single stone: Increasing the work-life balance and productivity at the same time. The benefits of working in Singapore 2.0 are too many to list, all credit due to the unions – real, independent unions. It all wouldn’t have been possible if not for NTUC ceasing to be.
Only museums remind us of how our pioneers had to slog it out for a living – ancestors from the samsui women to the cardboard collectors and the tissue paper seller. Loneliness slowly crept into their hearts as they spent their nights alone at nursing homes across the causeway. Even the mere act of reading about their hard labour in their golden years makes my heart weep. Thankfully, those are things of the past. It’s hard to see an elderly without a smile these days. In fact, you’re lucky if you even see one as most of them are touring around the world or enjoying their retirement in the southern islands – which was converted into a retirement resort for the elderly.
Singapore 2.0’s social safety net which was reinforced with titanium by the Government of the day does, admittedly, put some burden on the working class of today in the form of increased taxation, but the pay off at the end of the road is definitely worth it. Our universal healthcare system takes good care of us, Unlike the vast majority of Singaporeans in the past, we are also fortunate to actually see and use our pension funds.
Culture, culture, culture. Who would have thought that Singaporeans were once touted to be the most unhappy and unemotional people in the world? In a Singapore where one HDB estate gave birth to another and everything was pretty uniformed, maybe that wasn’t so surprising. Singapore 2.0 still has HDBs but we are now allowed to paint the exterior walls of our balconies and front corridors. An organized mess, a visual spectacle.
W!ld Rice plays are giving the cinemas a very good run for their money. Dialects, which were once near death, have also been resurrected. It’s hard to believe that poetry was once thought to be a luxury, when in Singapore 2.0 poetry is nourishment for the soul. ART is at the very heART of Singapore 2.0, as our leaders always boast.
Politics is sexy. Forget Parliament at City Hall, even the quality debates in SYP (Singapore Youth Parliament) will leave you astounded. I used to hear stories from my grannies that at one time, the ISA had made it possible for people to be locked up just for speaking up against the government. If ISA were around today, half of the secondary schools would be empty. All the victims of ISA were posthumously cleared of their charges and their survivors were paid compensation. Also, the children of exiles were given a grand homecoming a few national days ago – the video of them returning is a real tear-jerker, I warn you. Parliament is still white, but on the outside. Inside, it is a rainbow.
Singapore 2.0 is on the horizon, but it is up to us to go grab it. “You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.” I hope someday you’ll join us, and build a new Singapore as one. Just imagine lah!
This essay was submitted for the “My Singapore, My Future” essay contest organised by The Opinion Collaborative Ltd, in conjunction with the 50th anniversary of Singapore’s nationhood.
Comments from the judges –
“Really terrific, apart from women serving NS as nurses. Hey, women can be soldiers too!”
“I was particularly struck by the variety of socio-political views – and even political affiliations, as implied by some of the stances they took – that were represented by the essay entries. This is really healthy. Whoever asserts that The Online Citizen only caters and speaks to a narrow profile of Singaporeans can surely be proven wrong.”
Our Supporter:
The Monsoons Book Club is a non-profit-making association of concerned individuals interested in books and ideas relevant to the social, political and economic progress in the South East Asian. It aims to create a platform for people from all walks of life, including writers, intellectuals, artists, researchers and politicians to inform, share their thoughts, challenge conventional views; and to disseminate reports and recordings of such events to a wider audience through written and audio visual media. Monsoons Book Club is the trading name of Monsoons Book Club Limited (registered in Cardiff, UK).
About The Opinion Collaborative Ltd
The Opinion Collaborative Ltd (TOC Ltd) is a social enterprise registered with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority under the Companies Act. TOC Ltd is interested in the development of the online media sphere in Singapore, with the view of promoting an open and diverse media environment that values the constructive collaboration of ideas and views. It aims to do so by supporting websites that seek to enlighten readers and provide diversity of opinion, so as to ignite passion and responsibility in nation-building.
![](https://theonlinecitizen.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/uploads/2023/03/26202010/TOC_newlogo_small.webp)
Community
TikTok video shows woman confronting 12 tenants in HDB flat, demands immediate eviction
A now-viral TikTok video shows a woman confronting tenants after allegedly discovering 12 people living in an HDB flat. She demanded they leave within an hour and called the police. While some praised the agent for enforcing HDB regulations, others felt the one-hour notice was too harsh, especially for migrant workers who might have come home after a long day. The current occupancy limit for four-room or larger HDB flats is eight people.
![](https://theonlinecitizen.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/uploads/2024/09/09110725/sublet1.jpg)
SINGAPORE: A now-viral TikTok video, with nearly 2 million views, features a woman, reportedly a property agent, confronting a group of tenants after allegedly discovering 12 people living in an HDB flat.
The woman, along with a person filming the scene, seemingly there for an inspection, is seen counting the tenants and questioning how many people are staying in the unit.
The one-minute clip, posted last Thursday (5 September) under the title “HDB unit being illegally sub-let,” captures the cameraman comparing the situation to “Crime Watch.”
The video alleges that 12 individuals are crammed into the flat, raising questions about whether this is allowed in Singapore.
While counting heads, the woman also inspects the rooms, revealing cramped conditions.
Clothes hang from window grilles, a thin mattress leans against the wall, and belongings are scattered across the floor.
At one point, the cameraman alerts her to someone in the toilet, visible as a shadow behind the door.
In the kitchen, she questions an occupant about a missing cabinet door, but he cannot provide a clear explanation.
In another room, visibly dissatisfied, the woman finds a dismantled bedframe propped against the wall and asks who is responsible for it.
Later, she sternly addresses some of the tenants, saying, “I give u one hour to pack your stuff, and get out of the place, if not I call the police.”
The video ends with a shot of a police car parked below the HDB block, but it doesn’t show or explain what happens next to the tenants or whether they were eventually evicted.
@homesinhd Camera man feels like he is on Crime Watch. 12 pax squeeze in one flat in Singapore is crazy!! SG can meh? #realestate #realestatesingapore #singapore #crimewatch #police #exposed #caughtoncamera
In the comment section, some commended the property agent for taking responsibility by conducting spot checks to ensure tenants complied with HDB regulations.
However, others felt that the one-hour eviction notice could be too harsh for the tenants.
Several commenters speculated that the tenants, who appeared to be migrant workers, were likely unaware of the illegal subletting arrangement.
They may have paid rent, only to come home after a long day of work to find themselves being evicted.
In response to a netizen’s question about the illegal subletting, the admin of the TikTok account clarified that there were unauthorized tenants staying in the unit who were not registered with HDB.
The admin also mentioned that only six people are allowed to stay in four-room or larger flats, but some commenters corrected this information, noting that the maximum occupancy had been revised to eight.
Indeed, a joint press release in December 2023 announced that the occupancy limit had been increased from six to eight persons for three years, from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2026.
This revised cap applies to four-room or larger HDB flats, including living quarters within HDB commercial properties that are comparable in size to a four-room flat.
The measure is intended to ease rental pressure, driven by the sharp rise in residential rents due to COVID-19 disruptions and increased rental demand.
However, authorities have also warned that they will strictly enforce the occupancy cap and may revoke rental approvals for homeowners who violate these regulations.
2019 Report Reveals Four-Room HDB Flat Housing 24 Tenants
In 2019, a report emerged alleging that a four-room HDB flat was housing 24 tenants, four times the maximum allowed by HDB.
The flat contained three double-decker bunk beds crammed into each bedroom, accommodating at least 18 people across the three rooms. One bedroom alone had eight occupants, and the living room was illegally partitioned into two additional rooms, rented to two couples, bringing the total to 24 tenants.
Comments
Netizens question NTU’s choice of timber for Gaia Building amid mould issues
![](https://theonlinecitizen.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/uploads/2024/08/21194302/gaia-building.jpg)
SINGAPORE: The Gaia building at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University (NTU), which opened in May 2023 as Asia’s largest wooden structure, was initially celebrated for its sustainable design and architectural beauty.
However, just over a year later, the S$125 million (US$95.5 million) timber building is facing an unexpected challenge: mould growth.
The 450,000-square-foot Gaia building, constructed with sustainable timber beams and panels, has developed mould on its walls, raising concerns about the suitability of timber for large-scale construction in tropical climates like Singapore’s.
The mould issue highlights the global challenges that timber structures can face, especially in environments with high humidity.
According to Bloomberg, the mould problem at Gaia underscores the difficulties that timber buildings encounter worldwide.
The Gaia building’s timber supplier claims that the structure sequesters over 5,000 tons of CO2, even when accounting for shipping, as trees absorb carbon dioxide during growth.
However, Singapore’s tropical climate, with its high humidity and frequent rainfall, has revealed the limitations of using timber in such environments.
The wood used in Gaia, primarily Austrian spruce processed into mass-engineered timber, is less resistant to mould compared to other species.
In Singapore’s humid conditions, untreated spruce is particularly vulnerable to mould and rot, according to Andrew Wong of the International Wood Culture Society.
Erik L’Heureux, an associate professor of architecture at the National University of Singapore, emphasized that different climates present unique challenges for timber construction.
He noted that in tropical regions, special care is required to prevent issues like mould, while in other climates, such as deserts or freezing environments, timber faces other risks like cracking and splitting.
Singapore has used mass-engineered timber in over 20 projects in the past decade, but it remains unclear if other buildings are experiencing similar issues.
In contrast, Singapore’s colonial shophouses, built with regionally native hardwoods, are naturally resistant to mould.
However, sourcing these traditional hardwoods today is both difficult and costly.
Loh Kee Soon, the lead architect for Gaia at RSP Architects Planners & Engineers, explained that while thicker protective coatings could have mitigated some of the mould issues, his team opted against it due to cost concerns and a desire to showcase the natural wood grain.
Despite its aesthetic appeal, the presence of mould has raised health concerns among staff and students.
While the mould is not expected to affect the building’s structural integrity, NTU has implemented a comprehensive maintenance plan, which includes reapplying sealant to the timber, adjusting air-conditioning settings, and instructing staff to keep windows closed to reduce condensation.
Experts also recommend treating surfaces with bleach, applying thicker coatings, installing dehumidifiers, and running the air-conditioning continuously, although these measures could undermine the building’s sustainability.
Netizens question sustainability of NTU’s Gaia building amid mould concerns
Under Mothership’s Facebook post, netizens have expressed various concerns regarding the mould issue at Nanyang Technological University’s (NTU) Gaia building.
One user questioned whether continuing to use the building is worth it, given the upcoming maintenance and potential health risks to staff and students.
They suggested that if maintenance is not feasible, it might be better to endure a one-time inconvenience of demolition rather than face ongoing issues.
One commenter questioned the logic of using wood in Singapore’s hot and humid climate, suggesting that protective coatings should have been applied to prevent mould.
They pointed out that NTU should have had the resources to implement such measures.
Another netizen proposed that demolishing the building and replacing it with a concrete structure might be a better long-term solution than continually dealing with mould.
Netizens raise concerns over material choices for NTU’s Gaia building
Several netizens focused on the choice of wood for the building, criticizing the decision to use Austrian spruce instead of locally sourced tropical wood that is more resistant to humidity.
One commenter pointed out that using wood from Austria hardly seems sustainable or environmentally friendly when considering the carbon footprint.
Another suggested that the building should have used hardwoods like teak, ebony, or mahogany, which are more resistant to termites and mould.
Further criticism focused on the project’s planning, with some questioning why wood from a cool climate was used in Singapore’s tropical environment.
They speculated that the original committee might have prioritized reducing construction costs, leaving the current management to deal with the consequences.
One commenter expressed disbelief that the project proceeded with wood susceptible to mould, despite the availability of more suitable materials like teak and cedar.
They criticized the $125 million price tag, suggesting it reflects a “lowest cost wins” mentality that overlooks potential long-term costs.
One netizen also raised doubts about the building’s sustainability, questioning whether the cost of treating and preventing mould might become exorbitant over time and ultimately undermine the building’s sustainability claims.
The post Netizens question NTU’s choice of timber for Gaia Building amid mould issues appeared first on Gutzy Asia.
-
Singapore3 days ago
Singapore woman’s suicide amidst legal battle raises concerns over legal system
-
Diplomacy6 days ago
India PM Narendra Modi meets with PM Lawrence Wong; Four MoUs signed
-
Opinion1 week ago
Singaporean voters and the ‘Battered Wife Syndrome’
-
Parliament2 days ago
PAP MPs attack WP Gerald Giam in Parliament over NTUC independence from ruling party
-
Politics5 days ago
PAP adopts SDP policies after criticizing them: Dr Chee urges Singaporeans to see through tactics
-
Food6 days ago
NTU stall food prices questioned after parent pays S$6.30 for meal
-
Parliament23 hours ago
Minister Shanmugam rejects request for detailed information on visa-free visitor offences: Cites bilateral considerations
-
Civil Society1 week ago
CIVICUS Monitor labels Singapore as ‘repressed’ for crackdown on civic freedoms