Left: Marina Bay Sands construction yard taken on April 18 2009. Right: Marina Bay Sands Hotel at Night, 6 January 2019 (Image on right by RoBird/Shutterstock)

Hashtags and challenges have become part of internet culture – spanning across most, if not all, social media platforms. The latest trend on the Internet of Things is of course the #10yearchallenge where people share on social media two photos of themselves side by side, taken 10 years apart.

It started right around the New Year and picked up traction fairly quickly. I joined in on the fun too. After all, nostalgia is a powerful force. And besides, there’s no harm in posting another selfie, right?

Well, author and Associate Professor at UC Berkely, Kate O’Neill had a different perspective on the seemingly nonthreatening trend. After reading this, you might want to rethink joining in the fun of the #10yearchallenge.

In a series of tweet, Ms O’Neill shared a rather ominous possibility of how the #10yearchallenge provides a ripe data mining opportunity to tech companies who could use the photo comparisons to train facial recognition algorithms on age progression and age recognition.

The original tweet garnered a lot of attention. People were either deeply disturbed by this revelation or were rather nonchalant about it. Those who were unfazed cited the fact that these photos already exist online, so it’s not like the challenge adds any extra data.

Ms O’Neill contends that just putting those two photos together – one from 10 years ago, and one current – already streamlines the data. The challenge essential provides a broad data set of photos taken a fixed number of years apart. It’s much more reliable than simply extracting data from photos posted in the past, which tend not to be chronological.

So in essence, this data provided here is actually very, very helpful if you want to train a facial recognition algorithm on age-related characteristics.

Ms O’Neill goes on to say that the potential of facial recognition technology – a reliable and well-developed one – varies. Elaborating on this in an article on Wired, she posits three uses of the technology.

The first, more benign use, is the implementation of facial recognition in age progression in finding missing children. She highlighted the case in New Delhi last year when the police reportedly tracked down nearly 3,000 missing children in a matter of days with the help of facial recognition technology. And with some of the children having been missing for a while, the age progression aspect really helped.

The other potential of facial recognition is its use in advertising. For example, using age recognition for targeted advertising by using cameras or sensors to adapt the messaging for different age-groups. While this is a less exciting scenario, this could lead to some creepy interactions.

Have you ever talked about buying something and then suddenly see ads to that exactly same thing on every webpage you visit online? Yeah, like that but worse.

Going further, Ms O’Neill suggests that age progression could eventually be factored into insurance assessment and health care. So if you seem to be aging faster than your cohorts, insurance companies might not deem you to be a good insurance risk and charge you a higher premium.

Back in 2016, Amazon has introduced real-time facial recognition services which they sold to law enforcement and government agencies. But that raised privacy concerns as the software enabled authorities to track not just people who have committed crimes but anyone else they deemed a nuisance such as protestors. I’m sure you can see what a slippery slope this can be, especially without proper oversight.

So I don’t know about you, but that certainly worries me. On the one hand, technology will advance whether you join in the #10yearschallenge or not. After all, is it estimated that by 2020 more than half the earth’s population would be connected to the Internet of Things. It’s also getting tougher to live in the modern world and stay disconnected. On the other hand, it seems Facebook now knows me better than I know myself.

Speaking of Facebook, someone suggested that they were the ones behind the #10yearschallenge, socially engineering a meme for the purposes of data mining. However, they’ve denied any involvement in the creation of that trend.

“This is a user-generated meme that went viral on its own,” a Facebook spokesperson responded. “Facebook did not start this trend, and the meme uses photos that already exist on Facebook. Facebook gains nothing from this meme (besides reminding us of the questionable fashion trends of 2009). As a reminder, Facebook users can choose to turn facial recognition on or off at any time.”

Phew.

But regardless of the origin or intent behind this meme, Ms O’Neil asserts that people need to “become savvier about the data we create and share, the access we grant to it, and the implications for its use”.

Because as much as we should hold demand that business treat our data with respect, we should do the same.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MP Phua asks why govt reduces foreign quota and says Cube Boutique Hotel’s business would be hurt

In Parliament yesterday (26 Feb), Member of Parliament Denise Phua questioned the…

离职后盗刷总裁信用卡订餐!私人助理被监五个月

私人助理离职后仍盗用女总裁信用卡,前后73次,并通过送餐平台FoodPanda订购约2千200元餐食,被判五个月监禁。 被告林千黛(音译,Lin Qian Dai)日前涉嫌一项欺骗罪,目前已认罪并判刑五个月监禁。 案情显示,被告于2017年4月5日至2018年2月15日在Nippecraft工作,担任48岁受害女总裁的私人助理。 其职务包括帮受害者订机票和酒店,所以受害者将信用卡资料透露给被告。 由于因工作所需,会需要帮助受害者使用FoodPanda订餐,因此将受害者的信用卡资料储存在手机上。 被告于2018年2月15日离职,但她却未删除受害者的信用卡资料。 2019年7月7日,被告使用FoodPanda订餐时,使用了受害者的信用卡资料,随后发现受害者竟然未察觉,于是起了贪念,决定继续使用受害者的信用卡资料订餐。 被告在2019年7月13日到9月7日期间,共使用了73次FoodPanda分别向快餐店、咖啡厅和餐馆等订餐,且几乎是每天订餐,甚至一天多达五次。 2019年10月19日,受害者发现信用卡账单有许多涉及FoodPanda的非法交易,于是报警。 不仅如此,被告还欺骗FoodPanda将价值2千200多元的餐食递送给她,至今未赔偿一分钱。

主妇叹差太多了 不同诊所购疫苗价格差一倍

同一种疫苗,两个诊所卖两个价,价钱差几乎一倍,令求诊者费解。 有关疫苗为成人的麻疹、腮腺炎、德国麻疹联合疫苗(MMR)。一名不愿具名的家庭主妇(50岁)因下个月将到菲律宾旅游,需事先接受麻疹疫苗(MMR)注射,因此拨电到国立健保集团旗下的大巴窑综合诊所,询问有关疫苗价格,被告知每剂疫苗注射收费40新元。 不过,主妇的丈夫较早前,前往陈笃生医院的旅客保健及疫苗诊所接受注射,只收费29元。 而主妇的胞妹随后拨电询问新保集团旗下,淡滨尼综合诊所有关MMR疫苗注射收费时,被告知每剂疫苗收费仅20元3角。 主妇发觉,三间诊所的疫苗注射价格差距后,感到费解。她说道,虽然理解不同地方的价钱会有所差异,但是相差一倍是在太离谱了,更何况综合诊所都是政府的。“这种算是普通的疫苗,没理由价格相差这么多。” 新加坡卫生部在全国成人免疫计划下,促请成人能够注射两剂MMR疫苗,而注射费用也能使用保健储蓄支付。这个疫苗在我国三大区域医疗系统的综合诊所都有提供。 新保集团:多年未调整 国大综合诊所集团透露,每剂MMR疫苗注射收费40元;国立保健集团和新保集团告知媒体,他们综合诊所向7岁以上求诊者收费分别是40新元和20新元3角。前年甫成立的国大综合诊所,当时旗下共有五间综合诊疗所,其中四间还是从国立健保集团那儿接手的。 新保集团表示,虽然他们知道公共医疗机构的收费有所不同,但是该集团的MMR疫苗价格并没有根据多年来的价格变动而做出调整,所以收费仍是较为廉价。“在未来检讨价格时,MMR疫苗价格也会被列入当中,并把最新成本和病患所能承担的负担纳入考量中。” 另外两家疫苗收费较高的集团则表示,他们致力于为病患提供能负担得起的优质护理服务。 药物价格差别原因多 卫生部长颜金勇曾在2012年国会上提到,公共医院药物价格有差别的原因很多,包括他们在药物新旧合约上的买卖价格有变动、各机构的价格框架不同等。…