<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Online Citizen &#187; Uniquely Singapore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/category/leong-sze-hian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com</link>
	<description>a community of Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs in Singapore – Some interesting data from Labour Force 2011 Report</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-some-interesting-data-from-labour-force-2011-report/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-some-interesting-data-from-labour-force-2011-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=47214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by:&#160;Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the Labour Force 2011 report (see HERE)&#160; Less training? &#8220;Training participation fell in 2011 &#8230;&#8230;. 27% of residents aged 15 to 64 in the labour force participated in job-related structured training during the 12-month period ending June 2011.&#160; This was down from 29% a year ago &#8230;.. fall over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-some-interesting-data-from-labour-force-2011-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs in Singapore &#8211; 54,000 Job vacancies: Really?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-54000-job-vacancies-really/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-54000-job-vacancies-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=47026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ About two weeks ago, I gave a talk to a group of about 25 unemployed Professionals, Managers, Engineers and Technicians (PMETs). Many of these PMETs have been unemployed for more than a year. So, when the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) released its Job Vacancies, 2011 Report on 27 January, I decided [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-54000-job-vacancies-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs in Singapore &#8211; 2011 income growth, 1% or 0.7%?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-2011-income-growth-1-or-0-7/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-2011-income-growth-1-or-0-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=46820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to article &#8220;Median monthly income of Singaporeans rises 6.3%&#8221; (Straits Times, Feb 1) and the Employment Situation 2011 report, (Report) released on 31 January, 2012. Foreign employment up, locals down? Despite the consistent rhetoric that foreign labour will be scaled down, local employment grew by 36,600 in 2011, against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/02/jobs-in-singapore-2011-income-growth-1-or-0-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does NKF have $27 million more in the kitty now than it had in 2005?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/does-nkf-have-27-million-more/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/does-nkf-have-27-million-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=46574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to media reports that the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) is raising funds from the general public again, after a hiatus of about five years. It has launched a “give $1 a day to help sponsor artificial kidneys” campaign. According to NKF’s website (see HERE), the Ratio of reserves to annual operating expenditure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/does-nkf-have-27-million-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor children have 10% chance of making it to the top?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/poor-children-have-10-chance-of-making-it-to-the-top/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/poor-children-have-10-chance-of-making-it-to-the-top/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=46402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the article &#8220;Mobility in S&#8217;pore &#8216;higher than previously thought&#8217;&#8221; (Today, Jan 13). It states: Having poor or less-educated fathers does not necessarily mean their sons will fare similarly, according to a study by a Ministry of Finance economist. Using the income records of about 39,500 father-son pairs from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/poor-children-have-10-chance-of-making-it-to-the-top/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electricity tariff: Did fuel component increase by 181 percent?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/electricity-tariff-fule-component-181-percent-increase/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/electricity-tariff-fule-component-181-percent-increase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=46352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the advertisement notice in the media on the increase in the electricity tariff. The chart (see HERE) shows the increase in fuel prices versus the electricity tariff for the last five years. Non-fuel component not shown? As the electricity tariff comprises the fuel and non-fuel components, I would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/electricity-tariff-fule-component-181-percent-increase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can eligibility criteria for PA scheme be made more &#8220;humane&#8221;? Chan Chun Sing&#8217;s non-answer</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/can-eligibility-criteria-be-made-more-humane-chan-chun-sing/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/can-eligibility-criteria-be-made-more-humane-chan-chun-sing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=46188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the article “MPs urged to tell MCYS about those in need”  (Today, Jan10). The article quoted Acting Minister for MCYS (Ministry of Community Development Youth and Sports), Mr Chan Chun Sing as saying &#8220;We are constantly looking at various ways to help all Singaporeans in need. This includes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/can-eligibility-criteria-be-made-more-humane-chan-chun-sing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>18 percent drop in salary for poly graduates?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/18-percent-drop-in-salary-for-poly-graduates/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/18-percent-drop-in-salary-for-poly-graduates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=46156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the article “Higher pay but fewer full-time jobs for polytechnic graduates: Survey” (Today, Jan 9). It states that “The median gross monthly salary of fresh poly graduates in full-time permanent employment went up by S$50 to S$1,850. For post-NS graduates, their salaries rose by S$100 to S$2,100”. According [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/18-percent-drop-in-salary-for-poly-graduates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-employment act: 90 per cent get pay cut?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/re-employment-act-90-per-cent-get-pay-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/re-employment-act-90-per-cent-get-pay-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=46091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ The Re-employment Act has been implemented on 1 January 2012. Employers are now required to offer re-employment to their workers at age 62. Many re-employment issues? There may still be many unresolved issues with the re-employment act. From the perspective of workers, for example, what if a worker is offered re-employment at a huge [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/re-employment-act-90-per-cent-get-pay-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ministerial salary review &#8211; what&#8217;s missing?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/ministerial-salary-review-whats-missing/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/ministerial-salary-review-whats-missing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many of those who became Ministers earned more than the “top 1,000” benchmark, before they became Ministers?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/ministerial-salary-review-whats-missing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>127</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confused over U-Save rebates?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/confused-over-u-save-rebates/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/confused-over-u-save-rebates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the report “800,000 HDB households to receive S$40m of U-Save rebates” (ChannelNews Asia, Dec 31) and the 2.3 per cent increase in the electricity tariff. It states that “The U-Save rebates in January are the final tranche of the five years of rebates that were granted as part of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/confused-over-u-save-rebates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pawners linked to casinos?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/pawners-linked-to-casinos/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/pawners-linked-to-casinos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 03:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ 2nd in the world for gambling losses? I refer to the article “Gambling: The biggest losers” (The Economist, May 16). It states that “Marina Bay Sands and Resorts World Sentosa alone nearly outgross the entire Las Vegas Strip”. In the chart accompanying the above article, “Biggest gamblers – Loss per resident [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/pawners-linked-to-casinos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 in 3 PRs quit NS: How many still in S&#8217;pore?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/1-in-3-prs-quit-ns-how-many-still-in-spore/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/1-in-3-prs-quit-ns-how-many-still-in-spore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the article “8,800 PRs served NS in last five years” (Straits Times dated Nov 23). It states that “About 8,800 male foreigners, who became permanent residents (PRs) under the sponsorship of their parents, enlisted for and served national service (NS) over the last five years”. 1 in 3 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/1-in-3-prs-quit-ns-how-many-still-in-spore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inflation: 5.7% &#8211; How much more can Singaporeans take?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/inflation-5-7-how-much-more-can-singaporeans-take/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/inflation-5-7-how-much-more-can-singaporeans-take/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the article “Singapore&#8217;s inflation figures still higher than expected” (ST, Dec 24).Inflation in November has hit a three-year high of 5.7 per cent. Real earnings down Against this, real average monthly earnings slipped by 0.2 per cent in September, over the last 12 months. Transport fares up Public [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/inflation-5-7-how-much-more-can-singaporeans-take/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many Singaporeans have $131,000 in CPF at 55?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/how-many-singaporeans-have-131000-in-cpf-at-55/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/how-many-singaporeans-have-131000-in-cpf-at-55/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 03:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the report “CPF keeps 4% Special and Medisave Account interest rate” (Channel NewsAsia, Dec 19). It states that “from January 1 next year, the Medisave Required Amount (MRA) will be raised from the current S$27,500 to S$32,000”. This is an increase of about 16 per cent ($32,000 divided [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/how-many-singaporeans-have-131000-in-cpf-at-55/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real wage down 0.2 per cent</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/real-wage-down-0-2-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/real-wage-down-0-2-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the report &#8220;S&#8217;pore sees strong employment growth in Q3&#8243; (Channel NewsAsia). According to the Ministry of Manpower&#8217;s (MOM) press release on 15 December, on the Labour Market Q3 2011 (see HERE), &#8220;Nominal mean monthly earnings rose over the year by 5.4% in the third quarter of 2011, lower than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/real-wage-down-0-2-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cool HDB or private property?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/cool-hdb-or-private-property/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/cool-hdb-or-private-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Leong Sze Hian/ I refer to the article “Home prices may fall 30%, say analysts” (ST, Dec 9). Arguably, a bigger problem affecting many Singaporeans may be rising HDB prices, rather than the private property market. In the last quarter, HDB resale prices rose 3.8 per cent, higher than the 3.1 per cent in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/cool-hdb-or-private-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incomes growth: Well done! Really?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/incomes-growth-well-done-really/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/incomes-growth-well-done-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=45051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~ by Leong Sze Hian ~ I refer to the article “Increase real incomes for better lives key challenge for govt: PM Lee” (Dec 6, Channel NewsAsia). Incomes grew 3%? It states that “real median incomes grew by three per cent between June 2010 and June 2011, after adjusting for inflation”. Looking at the Singapore [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/incomes-growth-well-done-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year-on-year statistics reveal 36 per cent increase in non-Singaporeans</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/year-on-year-revealthirty-six-percent-increase-in-non-singaporeans/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/year-on-year-revealthirty-six-percent-increase-in-non-singaporeans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 03:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=44818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the Monthly Digest of Statistics (MDS) for Nov 2011 (see HERE), released by the Department of Statistics on 2 December 2011. More foreigners? Singaporeans in the population grew by 0.8 per cent, the lowest rate for the last six years. It was the same 0.8 per cent in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/12/year-on-year-revealthirty-six-percent-increase-in-non-singaporeans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income growth: Only 0.1%?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/11/income-growth-only-0-1/</link>
		<comments>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/11/income-growth-only-0-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniquely Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=44692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the article “S&#8217;pore job rate hits new high” (Channel NewsAsia, Nov 30). According to the Singapore Workforce – 2011 report released on 30 November (see HERE) “Excluding employer CPF contributions, growth in income (median monthly income from work of full-time employed residents) also accelerated in 2011, although by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2011/11/income-growth-only-0-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

