Community
Community, Main Stories, Politics - Friday, March 19, 2010 15:16 - 19 Comments
Breeding a subsidy mentality in housing
By Alex Au of Yawning Bread
In late January 2010, Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, in announcing the increase in the Additional Housing Grant from the previous S$30,000 to S$40,000, said that with the increase, some 8,000 households annually would benefit.
What does “8,000 households annually” mean? What percentage of Singaporeans would qualify for the Additional Housing Grant? Is that a large percentage or not?
In attempting to grasp the significance of this figure, I tried to compare it to the annual demand for ownership flats as reported by the HDB in their Annual Report. Over the last three years, this has averaged about 10,000 flats per year. The HDB defines “demand” as “bookings received by HDB for 2-room and bigger flats under the various allocation exercises, as well as bookings for Design, Build and Sell scheme flats.”
At first glance, 8,000 eligible out of an annual demand of 10,000 suggests that even the Additional Housing Grant is a scheme that throws money like confetti to all and sundry.
However, the details complicate such a simplistic conclusion. The Additional Housing Grant can be used for resale flats, but not for second-time purchases, whereas HDB’s 10,000-figure for demand includes second-time purchases, but excludes resale transactions. Hence, it is not possible to compare the two figures. Nevertheless, one is left with the distinct impression that not only do all Singaporeans’ first-time flat purchases get an assist from the first grant, perhaps a majority also get the Additional Housing Grant.
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the great majority of Singaporeans depend on subsidies to get a roof over their heads. We’re breeding a culture of dependency.
This cannot be tenable. I’m not against subsidies in principle, but it should only be for a small percentage of the population to mitigate extremes of poverty. Dishing out subsidies — and the schemes are permanent — to well over half the population cannot be fiscally responsible.
Unless…. they are not subsidies.
_________________________________
Read the entire article at Yawning Bread
_____________________________________________________________
- Don’t stand in the way of evolving social workers
- Lonely out of the gravy train
- Summoning hither the dolphins
- Bigotry of one – faith of another
- Aftermath of the Rony Tan incident: it has only just begun
- Not your ordinary chit-chat session
- Malays in 2007: Renewed confidence amidst turbulence?
- TOC Open Thread: Multiculturalism, Indian style
- Beyond Tokenism- Malays, Integration and the SAF
- A brief encounter with a Chinese woman
- Playing an active part as Singaporeans
- TOC Youth activism perspective
- Nation Builders
- More than just money needed to help poor
- “Every citizen is a reporter”
- Should homosexuals be allowed to teach?
- Homosexuality as a “disorder”: classification denies potential trainee teaching position
- $200 GST offset, but so much more to pay ad infinitum
- Foreign Talent policy: of principle and practice
- The Work Holiday Programme: an undergraduate’s concern
- The next step – “proactive blogging”?
- Decriminalising homosexuality in Singapore
- Public assistance for the elderly – where the ethics lie.
- LSIRC Discussion Forum 2007
- The changing face of Singapore – integrating our people
- The language of our forefathers – are we missing something?
- The construction of noise – Singapore de-constructed
- Big Brother in cyberspace – anonymously
- The poorest in our society
- Bloggers question Tochi’s execution
- The heart of society
- New northern hospital – public transport concerns
- Potential Death Traps in Ang Mo Kio Hub
Recent Comments