Connect with us

Uncategorized

Getting our hands dirty in the political blogosphere

Andrew Loh reflects on the survivability of TOC.

Published

on

The following is the personal view of the writer. It is not a TOC opinion or position.

Andrew Loh

I’ve just attended the seminar at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS). It was held at the National University of Singapore Law Faculty. Titled, “Getting their hands dirty: Recent developments in Singapore’s political blogosphere”, the seminar was well-attended. (A report of the event will be up soon on TOC.)

One of the talking points of the seminar was the survivability of blogs which are run like online newspapers, such as TOC. It’s an issue we here at TOC have been discussing for a while now.  How do we fund what we do? And indeed, what is it that we are doing?

In a nutshell, what are we?

Are we activists? Or just a bunch of bloggers? Or are we a hybrid of both – what I would term “blogivists”? At the moment, perhaps we are both – or are perceived to be so. This is where the issue is – to be both requires an amount of resources, in manpower, funds, time and effort. This therefore goes to the heart of survivability – if we are to continue to be what TOC is.

But before we even consider the issue of surviving, perhaps we should ask if it is worthwhile to do what we do, and to continue to do so.  Many have asked me about the goal of TOC. “Are you aiming to be the alternative news media in Singapore?” is a popular one. Indeed, some already see us as such. My answer has always been, “No. We are not a news website. Neither do we aim to be an alternative to the mainstream media.” The reason is very simple: We do not have the resources (funding, professionalism, manpower, etc ) – now or in the foreseeable future. Another question is this: “Is it your aim to be the Number One socio-political blog in Singapore?” My answer: No. There is no desire for us to be Number One, or Two, or Three or whatever. We are not in competition with anyone, honestly. I do hope that there will be more good blogs, however. Blogs and bloggers who can write and express themselves better than us.

For us at TOC, we are Singaporeans who have something to say. Period.

Is it worthwhile then to put in so much effort just to say something? Yes, it is. Because if you cannot say what you feel, then I think the country would be the worse for it. And that is the starting point for us at TOC – we do what we do because we want and know that Singapore can be better. It is our home, after all.

But the question comes full circle here – the question of survivability. If Singapore is our home and we feel it is important for us to speak up, then we must consider the long term presence of TOC. Of course, individual members of TOC can, if TOC is wound up, still express themselves in their own personal, individual blogs. Would that be less effective? Maybe but look at Alex Au. He’s one of the best bloggers around and people listen to what he says. It is the substance that matters in the long term and we can learn much from Alex. Not least his stamina. He’s been around for more than 10 years!

Having said that, it is heartening to see all the folks at TOC coming together as a team. Indeed, I am still amazed at how this has all happened. In the last two years, we must have met or communicated with at least 100 like-minded people, with about 60 to 70 of them having written or helped TOC in one way or another.

It hasn’t been an easy ride. Many a time our reporters, writers, videographers and editors have had to work through the night and sacrifice their personal time. An example would be the migrant workers week we did where we spent days and nights visiting and speaking to the workers and the people from NGOs like HOME and TWC2. At times, we were personally outraged at what we saw and heard but had to retain objectivity. It was an experience of learning as we went along.

Zheng Xi has been a really great chief and has been instrumental for a large part of what TOC is. Many times he too had to work through the night on stories we are covering. Terence too is wonderful in his dedication. As are Boris, Sze Hian, Deborah, Roderick, Mervin, Jing Wei, Yina, and so many others, including those who work behind the scenes and are hardly known – and everyone who takes the time to visit our site and read what we create.

And for this alone, the dedication and contribution of so many, it is imperative for the editors of TOC to find a way for TOC to continue.

We started out as just a blog but we may have become something a little more than this. As Zheng Xi, our chief, once told me (I paraphrase him): There is a responsibility to our readers and to those who have supported us these last two years.

I feel the same.

 ———–

Join TOC’s Facebook here.

———–

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending