The title of this article is a question which I have been pondering on for some time now. Have we lost our ability to appreciate the good things which Singapore offers? And to be sure, there are good things about Singapore. In fact, there are many of them.

Yet, when we visit the Internet, it would seem, as Mr Lui Tuck Yew said in February 2009, that there is “a prevalence of noises, rumours and distortions in cyberspace…. while there were reasoned and critical views, there were also a great deal of unhelpful commentary and discussions online”. (Source)

And to a certain extent, the Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts is not entirely wrong.

Now, I am no fan of the minister whom I think has adopted a rather unnecessarily confrontational stance towards the Internet community since he became Mica minister. But that does not take away from the fact that indeed there seems to be an entirely different Singapore painted by netizens, if you go by postings especially on socio-political blogs and websites, The Online Citizen included.

Of course there is room for dissent and for different viewpoints. What I am asking here is: Is Singapore or the Singapore government so entirely devoid of anything good that we only have criticisms for it? And have we lost our ability to appreciate the positives?

It would take a courageous blogger to praise Singapore or the government when it is deserved, it would seem.

So, you may ask, what exactly is good about Singapore? Well, each person will have his own views on these. For me, first and foremost, I appreciate the safety and security we have. It’s a cliché, yes, but it is nonetheless true that Singapore is safe. Yes, we can debate about the draconian and prohibitive laws and rules, some of which we hope will be removed one day – such as the Internal Security Act. But Singapore is safe. Everyone knows it. Just take a walk past midnight anywhere on this island.

The grumblings and complaints about the transport system have become almost legendary now. Yet, it is also true that the MRT system, especially, is by and large an efficient and comfortable ride. Of course, again, there are improvements to be made, such as overcrowding during certain times of the day. But this is something which will always be  a work in progress. I do not think we will ever reach a stage where we will have a 100 per cent consensus on happiness or satisfaction about the quality of service. Truth be told, nonetheless, I am quite impressed by the newly-opened Circle Line and the Land Transport Authority should be commended for a job well done. (My only wish is that the stations should be more colourful but that is another matter altogether.)

The Youth Olympics, which will take place from the 14th to 26th August this year, is another thing we can and should be proud of. And I commend the MCYS team, especially Mr Teo Ser Luck, for successfully winning the bid to bring the games here.

What about the government itself, which is the target of much unhappiness among netizens? I feel that the problem is a real one, that of hubris. The People’s Action Party, which has ruled independent Singapore since 1965, has grown arrogant and out-of-touch with the average common man and woman. This is self-evident in many instances, especially these past 10 years or so. And the main culprit, I feel, is Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew who, despite his age, sets the tone for the government led by his son.

Having said that, however, I do feel there are good people in government nonetheless. One whom I quite like is Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam. I would prefer him to be Prime Minister, rather than the incumbent. This is not to say that Mr Tharman has no shortcomings. His pussyfooting around the issue of investment losses incurred by both Temasek Holdings and the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) two years ago revealed the delicate tight-rope he had to walk. But from all accounts, or at least those that I have been given to know, he is a sincere man who is well-liked, someone who is seen to be intelligent, a good listener and one with his feet firmly set on the ground.

At the lower level, some PAP Members of Parliament too, I feel, are good MPs. One whom I have often praised is Lee Bee Wah. This is because I used to be her constituent. Sure, she screwed up notably with her rather unbecoming remarks in Parliament three years ago and her handling of the STTA saga in 2008. The criticisms leveled at her in 2008 were, in my opinion, well and truly deserved. But that does not take away from the fact that she is a very hardworking MP on the ground. Even now, when I have moved from her constituency in Ang Mo Kio GRC, I still receive invitations to attend her grassroots activities. Well, perhaps this is because she has not updated her constituents roll but that is not the point. In my experience, her presence on the ground, in the coffeeshops, markets, at her Meet-The-People sessions, were ubiquitous and regular. My only hope is that the STTA saga has taught her further lessons in politics and humility.

There are many other things I could list which we should be happy about. Some of these are physical attributes, such as downtown Marina Bay/Clark Quay which is beautiful. Others would include the easy availability and the variety of food we have here.

And then there are the people. Singaporeans. Idiosyncrasies, yes, but also positivities. I have met selfless individuals, passionate individuals who give of their time to help others. I have seen, many times, for example, the younger ones giving up their seats on trains and buses to the elderly. I have seen young girls who would give $5 to the elderly selling tissue paper. I do feel it is an over-generalisation that people are selfish, a refrain which is oft-repeated. I also do feel we do not give Singaporeans enough credit.

Yet, Singapore can be better. Any country can be better. What I hope for Singapore, now that we have proved that we can build physical infrastructures, is that we have more heart. That we would value things of the human spirit. By this I mean, for example, the value of human life, dignity for the less fortunate, compassion which is second nature to us, and appreciation for those who do not measure up to society’s standards.

Perhaps these are the things which we presently lack, things which would truly help us appreciate that behind all the grand facades we are a people whose blood runs deeper. A people whose accomplishments go beyond the material or physical and into the realm of spirit.

Now, that would indeed be something worth appreciating, more than all the beautiful skyscrapers we behold.

But for now, lets not forget to appreciate what we have.

Andrew Loh

—————-

Picture from haddock’s photostream

—————

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

为无助单亲爸爸打气 地铁站暖男经理善举获赞

嘘寒问暖有温情,雪中送炭更可贵:一名正面临失业的单亲爸爸,送孩子上课时连搭地铁车资都不够,不过地铁站一位超有爱心的经理慷慨解囊,也以过来人身份为这位年轻单亲爸爸加油打气,让人感受到在这钢筋水泥大都会中,甘榜精神还在。 在本地网络媒体《Stomp》就分享这么一则好人好事:一位单亲爸爸于11月20日在送两名孩子到学校上课时,到了中峇鲁地铁站才发现身上带的车资根本不够搭车。 身为单亲爸爸的他,当时正面临失业困境,因此就向地铁站的控制中心求助,而该地铁站经理莫汉当时就负责接待他。 分享经历作为鼓励 “莫汉和我分享了他也是数个成年孩子的父亲,展现了善解人意的一面。” “他打破了乘客和职员的隔膜,好似脱下了制服来和我分享了身为父亲的经验。” 卡莱布指出,莫汉当时指出,宗教和肤色都无关紧要,因为生命太短暂,所以必须友善对待彼此。而他在看待不同种族婚姻上有另一种看法,并指自己的儿子就娶了一名华裔妻子。 “他分享说,作为父亲所经历的艰苦路程,将为生命未来带来更多更有意义的事情。他以过来人身份,给予我鼓励和支持。” 在两人分道扬镳之前,莫汉回到办公室中,自腰包中取出100元后交给卡莱布,作为送给他的一份祝福。“他说,他希望我能够拥有这笔钱。” 卡莱布对莫汉的作为感动万份,“我和你分享这些,并不仅因为他的慷慨,也因为他拥有如此杰出的品行。” “对他而言,我只是个陌生人,他却能如此对我,可想而知对其孩子来说,这是一名多么善良的父亲,对其职员和下属而言是多么和善的领导及经理。” 他赞扬莫汉的作为,更为SMRT感叹,当局是多么幸运拥有如此杰出的员工。…

Worker dies after crashing through ceiling at Tampines Mall

A worker has died after falling through a false ceiling at Tampines…

I have had ‘more than required’ of this.

The following post is published on March 3, 2011 at Kirsten Han’s…

MND announces all TCs excel in operational performance; Sengkang TC given ‘Amber” rating in S&CC Arrears Management

The Ministry of National Development (MND) revealed that all town councils in Singapore achieved a “Green” rating for Estate Cleanliness, Estate Maintenance, and Lift Performance in the Fiscal Year 2022 TCMR Operational Report. However, Sengkang Town Council received an “Amber” rating in S&CC Arrears Management as the monthly collectible S&CC for the town overdue was slightly more than 40% of total collectible even though less than 4 in 100 households that owed arrears for three months or more.