According to data collated by statistics site Our World in Data, Singapore has conducted an average of 7.6 tests for each confirmed case since the COVID-19 outbreak started. This is compared to 18 test in Japan, 84.9 in South Korea, and 250.4 tests in New Zealand.

What the graph below tells us is that for every 7.6 COVID-19 tests conducted in Singapore, one will be positive. The data for Singapore is as of 1 June. We also note that the number of tests is different from the number of people tested, as one person may be tested more than once.

According to Our World in Data, Singapore’s test numbers are based on reports from the Ministry of Health on the number of people that have been tested and the number of swab tests that have been conducted, both of which the ministry started reporting on 10 April.

The site noted that countries with very few tests per confirmed case are unlikely to be testing widely enough to find all cases.

Singapore’s 7.6 tests per confirmed cases is still below the World Health Organisation’s recommendation of 10 to 30 as the benchmark for adequate testing.

In a World Health Organisation (WHO) briefing on 30 March, Dr Michael Ryan said, “In general where testing has been done fairly extensively we’ve seen somewhere between 3 and 12 percent of tests being positive…we would certainly like to see countries testing at the level of ten negative tests to one positive as a general benchmark of a system that’s doing enough testing to pick up all cases.“

Now, the Singapore government has repeatedly stated that the high number of positive cases in the country is due to extensive testing.

On 19 May, the Ministry of Health’s director of medical services Associate Professor Kenneth Mak said in a briefing that over 281,000 COVID-19 tests have been conducted to day on 191,000 unique individuals. That’s about 49,000 tests per million people being carried out in Singapore, he noted.

On 14 May, Minister for Manpower Josephine Teo had urged the public not to be “overly alarmed” as the number of positive cases among the migrant worker population in Singapore increases as this is due to “comprehensive” and “aggressive” testing being carried out.

She said, “Few countries have tested their migrant populations extensively; far fewer have undertaken to test all their migrant workers, as Singapore has.”

Even earlier on 27 April, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said, “Our testing capacity for migrant workers is about 3,000 a day. We have not reduced it. Instead we have been increasing the capacity of testing of our migrant workers. The rate of testing has not slowed”

“A total of 21,000 migrant workers living in dormitories have been tested since the start of the outbreak. This means that 1 in 15 migrant workers in dormitories have been tested.”

On the same day, the MOH said in a statement, “To date, Singapore has tested about 2,100 per 100,000 persons. In comparison, the US has tested 1,600 per 100,000 and the UK 1,000 per 100,000. “

It added, “From an average of 2,900 tests per day in early April, we are now able to conduct more than 8,000 tests per day. “ (Note that the test capacity stated is different from actual tests conducted.)

However, all these statements and explanation from various ministers and the MOH do not quite tally with the graph above.

While it’s true that Singapore conducts a high number of tests per capita, we also have a higher percentage of positive cases in this country based on the population.

The extensive testing is also targeted towards people who are exhibiting symptoms, close contacts of infected patients, and those in high risk areas such as isolated foreign worker dormitories. Singapore is not simply testing everyone.

As such, what this Our World in Data graph likely indicates is that there might be cases within the community that have yet to be diagnosed due to how the tests are conducted compared to other countries.

As you can see in the graph, the number of tests conducted by New Zealand goes far beyond the number of confirmed cases.

That’s 250.4 tests for one confirmed cased compared to Singapore’s 7.6. So is Singapore really testing as extensively as the government says?

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SDP’s Chee Soon Juan highlights inadequate drainage at Bukit Batok; urges Town Council to take prompt action

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan took to his Facebook…

An amicable ending to an act of mischief by boy on bike

A motorist, Aaron Rylan Facebook page shared a video from his dashcam…

印尼也失守! 总统佐科维亲自证实两起确诊病例

从武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)爆发至今,一直都未传出有人感染的印尼,今日(2日)经该国总统佐科维亲自证实,该国出现首两起确诊病例。 根据《雅加达邮报》报导,两名当地人,64岁和31岁的印尼母女,曾与一名日本游客有近接触,该名日籍人士到过印尼,在上月27日,在马来西亚确诊。 佐科维表示,当局在得知有关日籍人士确诊后,便立即追踪曾与病患杰出人士,并证实有两人经测试对武汉冠病呈阳性反应。 不过,佐科维也表示,印尼方面有上百家医院都有具良好隔离标准的隔离病房,器材也符合国际标准。 而该国卫生部长普特兰托表示,有关妇女住在西爪哇的德波(Depok),目前已在雅加达的 Sulianti Saroso传染病医院接受治疗。 此前印尼一直未传出确诊病例,令各国人士质疑其检测程序,不过该国卫生部长还强调该国的病毒检测程序没有问题,国内没有确诊病例,都是“上苍的护佑”。

社论:竞消委应避偏袒官联企业之嫌

职总创优企业合作社(NTUC Enterprise)将收购Kopitiam集团,视之为符合职总履行社会使命、提供国人可负担的餐饮服务。 与此同时,私召车巨头GRAB收购优步业务,却被竞争消费委员会,判定为违反竞争法,两家公司被罚1千300万新元。 虽是不同个案,但要说上述两起收购交易,同样削减市场的竞争力,值得进一步论证。但,为何两件个案受到的待遇和关注截然不同? 职总企业,正是旗下职总社会企业(包括职总富食客)的控股实体、唯一最大股东。职总富食客经营14食阁、10间咖啡店和9座小贩中心。 KOPITIAM集团旗下则有56家食阁、21间咖啡店、管理三个小贩中心和两个中央厨房。并购KOPITIAM 集团,意味着职总企业几乎垄断本地小贩饮食市场。 若把职总旗下的平价连锁超市(Fair Price)算在内,职总集团实际上已经垄断了从原料到熟食的整条食品供应产业!新加坡竞争监管机构是不是应该好好检视,这种违反市场自由竞争的垄断行径? 如果GRAB和优步并购违反竞争法,职总企业收购KOPITIAM岂能不闻不问?后者并购对市场的破坏比起GRAB优步合并,有过之而无不及! 我可以理解GRAB优步合并,使本国私召车共享科技为单一企业独享。但须知不是所有国人都有使用这服务。 垄断餐饮冲击更大…