Andrew Loh /

“At the start of [our] pre-election public outreach, I have brought up instances where the PAP has abused its power as a government to secure political advantage for the PAP, to perpetuate itself in power and to deny more opposition being elected into Parliament,” Mr Low Thia Khiang, Workers’ Party secretary general, told the packed field at Kallang Avenue on Monday.

“They have been very successful in the last 46 years in doing this,” he told the crowd.

This abuse of power has led to the opposition being unable to grow and develop, Mr Low said. He cited the increase in the number of people voting for the opposition but yet only two elected opposition members have been in Parliament the last two decades.

It is because of this “political reality” facing the opposition and “to help Singaporeans seriously contemplate the future for Singapore” that the Workers’ Party has chosen the election slogan, “Towards a first world parliament” for the general election this time.  This is the vision the party is offering Singaporeans, Mr Low said.

“A first world parliament is one which is able to balance a strong Executive with a check and balance mechanism formed by a credible and responsible opposition which is given the mandate by the electorate,” Mr Low told the enthusiastic crowd. “This is the first step to stop further abuse of power by the PAP.”

Mr Low cited the People’s Association (PA) as an example of such abuse, through its network of Residents’ Committees (RCs), Citizen Consultative Committees (CCCs). “They also organize activities which PAP candidates are invited to attend so that these new candidates can build up rapport quickly on the ground,” Mr Low said. The party had brought up the matter in earlier rallies. “The PAP has yet to respond to the issue,” said Mr Low.

He cited a recent example of a resident in Aljunied GRC who received a message some days ago from the RC.

“The message reads:

‘I am the RC chair. I would like to circulate some election info to you, if it’s ok with you.’

The resident replied: ‘Which party do you represent?’

The reply came back: ‘Hi. We’re not representing any party.’

Then she [the resident] received this message on general election info: ‘There’s a rally at Serangoon stadium from 7pm tonight.'”

“It was informing the resident of the PAP rally!” Mr Low said. “Why is the RC promoting a PAP rally?” he asked. The rally crowd then echoed “Kelong! Kelong! Kelong!” – the colloquial word for cheating.

Mr Low went on and raised two other issues which showed the abuse of power by the PAP government – why the PAP is able to have kindergarten branches while the WP could not; and why he, as an elected Member of Parliament (MP), has had to conduct his Meet-The-People sessions at the void decks for the last two decades, an issue he had also raised at a previous rally. “I have yet to get an answer from the PAP,” Mr Low said.

The GRC system and the issue of gerrymandering were also highlighted by the WP in its other rallies. “Again, no response,” said Mr Low, referring to the PAP. “Instead, we have MM Lee jumping up and down about the contest in Aljunied GRC.”

“But I think he has to watch his Tanjong Pagar GRC teammate, Chan Chun Sing, carefully,” Mr Low said, who referred to the answer Mr Chan had given when asked for his views on new PAP candidates not serving National Service (NS).

Mr Chan had said:

“For me, I don’t just ask where you come from. More importantly, I ask where you are going. In the past, if you have not been a citizen, you may not have contributed to NS, or maybe different walks, different sectors of society.” (See here at 3:40 mins.)

Mr Low took issue with Mr Chan’s comments. “Is he saying that National Service is not important? That it does not matter whether one serves National Service? I do not feel [it is] right that the PAP should fill a foreign talent who just became a new citizen without serving National Service as a candidate.”

“He is now trying to seek your mandate to represent the people in parliament,” Mr Low added.

Although Mr Low did not mention the candidate by name, it is apparent he was referring to Dr Janil Puthucheary, the PAP candidate for Punggol-Pasir Ris GRC, which is helmed by Mr Teo Chee Hean.  Dr Puthucheary, 38, became a Singapore citizen three years ago – at the age of 35. The issue of his never having served National Service was a point of criticism among some Singaporeans. When asked about this, he had said that while it “is a fact” that he did not do NS, he however had “spent the last 10 years saving kids’ lives.” (Read here, here and here.)

Mr Low reminded the crowd of what Defence Minister Mr Teo had said in Parliament  in 2006 on the matter of NS defaulters.

Besides, the fact that they are talented and can contribute to Singapore does not detract from the fact that they have defaulted on their NS duties. Everyone, regardless of talent, must play their part in our nation’s defence. (Mindef)

“Mr Chan Chun Sing was the Chief of Army before,” Mr Low said. “How can a former Chief of Army publicly state something contradictory to the Minister for Defence?”

“I propose that we consider amending the Constitution for the qualification for male candidates for election, to reject those who have not served National Service,” Mr Low said, to loud applause from the crowd. “This is only fair to us. We have all done National Service, including myself, including Chen Show Mao,” he added, referring to his teammate for Aljunied GRC who was reported to have served his NS even before he became a Singapore citizen.

Mr Low asked if this was the attitude of Mr Chan, who is considered one of the new PAP candidates with the potential to be office holders to lead Singapore into the future, towards National Service, a duty which every male Singaporeans have the obligation to fulfill.

Mr Low then turned to the point he had made at the beginning of his speech – that Singaporeans should not allow one party to dominate their lives.

“We should not put all [our] eggs in one basket by voting in just PAP candidates, leaving the entire legislature to them, to operate, to allow them to dominate your lives,” Mr Low said. “We must not let them shortchange us!”

Ending his English speech, Mr Low urged, “If you are concerned about your livelihood, and our children’s future, then vote Workers’ Party, towards a first world parliament!”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Elderly should be given options to access Govt’ services over the counter as many of them struggle to use digital tools, says WP’s Sylvia Lim

The elderly should be given the options to access the Government services…

Service disruption continues on Circle Line, spurring suspension of telco networks during peak hours

Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) has announced on Friday (4 November) morning…

抵触《公共秩序法》被禁两周 行动艺术家施兰今获释

经历两周监禁,艺术家和社运分子施兰(Seelan Palay)于今日获释。在脸书上,他宣称他的艺术表演:“32年:镜子的审问”随着他的监禁划下总结。 在本月3日,新加坡法院判处施兰因在未获许可证下进行表演活动,触犯《公共秩序法》罪名成立,罚款2千500元,或监禁两周。而施兰选择了监禁的惩处。 他在未有代表律师的情况下,出席9月26日的法庭审讯。面对主控官的审问,施兰坚称其艺术表演全程以平和的方式进行,且没有告知、直到任何人追随他,从原表演地点国家艺术馆走到国会。 他也强调,表演他全程沉默,仅靠镜子来表达含义,以及针对警方的询问才作礼貌答复。 当主控官质问,其表演具有目的、是否影射政府当年监禁谢太宝的决策是错误的,施兰则回应,艺术本身并不必然有任何目的。 在去年10月,施兰独自一人站在国会前,举着“一面画有图案的镜子,批判政府前国会议员谢太宝遭囚禁和软禁32年,进行无声抗议。在警方劝离不果而被当场逮捕。 谢太宝在1966年在内安法令下被逮捕,被政府指控从事亲共、颠覆政府活动。结果,这名议员在未经审讯和起诉下,被监禁至1998年才重获自由。 ‘网络公民’以视频记录下施兰的和平抗议,后者并无作出多大的威胁,为了控诉对前国会议员谢太宝的不当囚禁待遇,只是拿着一面镜子站在艺术馆和国会前和平抗议。 他不曾干扰民众,也不曾反抗警方,然而施兰最终还是被逮捕了。逮捕施兰的行动,显示当权者无法容忍异议与民众的批判,也延续了司法的不公义。

Speaker of Parliament agrees with judgment call by MOH not to inform patients and public about HIV data leak

Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin said that he agrees with the judgment…