by: Shirani Alfreds/

The premier of ‘Cooling Off Day’, a dramatized depiction of ‘grassroots’ sentiments of the 2011 Singapore General Elections (‘GE’), played to a full house last night at the Drama Centre. Prior to this year, it could be said that one generally did not expect much by way of ‘political play’ in Singapore, but this left me more than pleasantly surprised – even proud.

Based on a series of interviews with Singaporeans of varying backgrounds, the play was witty, funny, replete with one-liner ‘insider’ Singlish and General Election (GE) jokes, and encapsulated a good range of views and emotions that the GE had engendered.

The whole thing was topped off with an unpretentious and local tone that was unmistakeably ‘ours’ and truly ‘ours’ as Singaporeans.

There was  so much ‘Singaporean’ in the play that I was tempted to lead a standing ovation at the end of it, and certainly after the first half which ended with a skilfully choreographed hawker scene with brilliant metaphorical references to hallmark election events (read: Touchy Issues and Statements Made)!

So what made it so enjoyable?

Needless to say, it’s writing was flawless. Alfian Sa’at’s transformation of the interviews into presentation for the stage was admirable, as was the co-direction of Ivan Heng and Jo Kukathas. (The latter also played several of the characters in the play).

Avoiding boring soliloquies that could so easily have been the outcome of the presentation of interviews, characters (some larger-than-life!) were colourful and amusing.

Perhaps a tad dramatized to be stereotypical, the persons represented (whose names, ages, races and backgrounds were flashed overhead as they spoke), were nonetheless identifiable, their relatable issues often pulling at heartstrings as poignant and serious reminders of what the GE had signified to some – a chance to be heard.

Or the heavy realisation that there is no cure for the forgotten and the disillusioned, or, as one of the characters, TOC’s very own Joshua Chiang stated, that ‘there is no Messiah’ for political change and we should not look to others.

Humour, quite central to the script together with moments of engendered audience participation, provided an overall light-hearted and casual atmosphere that was smoothly executed by the star-studded cast each playing a variety of characters that included veterans such as Neo Swee Lin and Tan Kheng Hua.

Just how was such an endeavour executed on our sunny shores one might ask?

The play candidly explored views (as its blurb states) “from election candidates to pro-establishment civil servants; from taxi-drivers to teachers; from diehard opposition supporters to young people casting their virgin votes”.

A W!LD RICE presentation, it is part of the MAN Theatre Festival sponsored by Man Investments. As director Ivan Heng announced, it is an independent festival with no government funding.

That might indeed account for some freedom of content, but the play was by no means partisan having represented a lot of the sides of the coin, that are in any case, our views charmingly re-presented on stage. In fact, the only apparent bias was its partiality to benefits of the “east” versus the ‘west’ (of Singapore) – a prejudice I heartily approve of, being an ‘easty’ myself!

Even more assuring that the times are indeed a-changing with people interested and engaging politically is that tickets are sold out for all nights already, and that consequently, Mr Heng announced that ‘second circle’ seats are being released.

So for a night of engaging and thought-provoking fun with local humour, check out: http://www.mansingaporetheatrefestival.com/play/cooling-off-day.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

一窥台北公共住宅新政 只租不卖 用十年让房价合理化

台湾住宅自有率高达80巴仙,当地民众同样也抱有“拥屋”心态,租房通常知识在有能力置产前的过渡阶段。 然而,当地私人租屋市场向来不被政府重视,致使诟病衍生,除了不合理的租房价格,一些房东把一些原本就不适合居住的空间,如天台和地下室改造称租房空间,将租房利润最大化;此外,租户还得面对各种租屋歧视,使得特定群体很难找到租房。 租房居住品质和房客权益缺乏保障,加之被炒高的房价,致使民众提出“居住正义”的诉求。为此,当地政府才会出台“只租不卖”的社会住宅,以低于市价的租金提供给青年、弱势群体,让房屋回归到居住的基本需求。 台北市长柯文哲曾打着“四年完成两万户社会住宅”的竞选承诺,上任后也积极落实,当前,已落成并有住户入住的公共住宅达到三处。 只要户籍和学籍在台北,就可抽签申请公宅。不过当前已落成的仅约一千户,柯文哲认为,只有完成所有两万户后,申请者抽签中签率才较高。 而在今年年底前,全台北将有32至35处、约两万户的公共住宅动工。 在接受当地网络媒体采访,市长柯文哲介绍新建好的公共住宅。小型一房式住宅租金大约7100台币,折合新元约为315元,这还不包括政府将提供的租金补贴。价格虽然可负担,但是在房屋素质和舒适度并未妥协,打出“智慧住宅”概念,所有住宅都有配备温度计、照度计、智慧保全和智慧对讲机。 每个住宅都能链接网络,因为柯文哲认为,穷人没有办法链接网络,根本没机会翻身。他们必须要有管道接触知识资源。在台北,国小三年级以上都可以免费使用网络。 公共住宅也附有社区空间,如跑步跑道和可以种菜田园空间等等,以期打造“田园城市”。 36坪的三房式住宅价格在减免前为两万一千台币,依据台北租房市价,至少介于3万5千至4万台币(折合新币1千700元)。 公共住宅价格比市价稍低,柯文哲的概念是让整体台北的房价缓步重归稳定合理。“如果房价突然下挫,会导致市场大乱,所以宁可用十年的时间让房价合理化。”  …

评论:个人代步工具– 关于阶级和愚昧无知

Nicholas Tang: 我必须老实说,我讨厌个人代步工具。我认为他们对社会是有威胁的,落实针对电动滑板车的禁令是应该的。我们也有同样的不满:我们讨厌它们在行人道上快速移动,我们讨厌个人代步工具让我们在已经非常狭窄的行人道,让路人无法安全走路,但通常就是很反感电动滑板车大声播放令人难受的音乐(例如小苹果),我觉得应该要把这也列为“犯罪行为”。 尽管如此,我却认为政府不应该禁止个人代步工具。当然,禁令是最简单快速的解决方式,但却不是最佳方案。这不仅仅是交通安全法规的问题,个人代步工具更像是揭露了社会的裂痕,而我们需要对这些裂痕加以修复,避免社会基础崩裂。我将聚焦在三种不同的要素,他们互相交织与连结,不能仅单独讨论:阶级、政府政策与社会责任。 阶级问题 其中阶级可分为两种问题:首先,他们被视为实用实惠,大众均负担得起;再者,个人代步工具开启了送餐行业新景象,让过去无法负担昂贵高效交通工具的人,找到另一种工作机会。 第一点,在颁布禁令后,网友何益豪(Kelvin Ho)将自己对禁令的不满发布到网上,其中已可明显看见阶级主义的效应。在Reddit中,所有的评论大部分聚焦在嘲笑他作为送餐员与新加坡口音。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czuM9-uxnJ4 嘲笑他人口音缺同理心 当然或许他的送餐经验相对缺乏,但他确实提出几点值得讨论。此外,新加坡确实有一部分人的口音如同何益豪,尽管不能理解他的论点,但也不能成为攻击他个人品行的原因,这显示社会不同阶层的人对彼此缺乏同理心的一种表现。 何益豪提出了观点:不是每个拥有个人代步工具的人,都能够负担摩托车,或是其他交通工具。…

PM Lee Hsien Loong on overseas leave until 31 December

Prime Minister Office (PMO) has announced on Tuesday (19 December) that Prime…

Revision of ERP charges at PIE and KPE from 6 November 2017

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has announced the revised ERP rates  on…