By Jen

I never cease to be amazed when I come across incredulous claims made by the PAP government and their devoted supporters.  One wonders if it is sheer arrogance that makes them say things that are clearly not true and yet they think they can get away with it? Examples abound with the most glaring example being erroneous claims made to enhance the reputation of the MIW. Some of these erroneous claims include assertions that Singapore was an ulu backwater, swamp, slum before the PAP came along and saved the day.

I thought I had heard it all until I read Ex-Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew asserting in a speech to an international and local audience that Singapore was “a barren island” when the PAP first took control in the 1960s!

Mr Lee had made these remarks earlier this week while hosting a French oil company to dinner at the Istana. He said: “We were suddenly confronted with the challenge of making a living for two million people on a barren island at the southernmost tip of Asia, which gives us the advantage of servicing all the ships that cross the Atlantic and the Pacific.

EXCUSSSSSSE Moi! I laughed when I read this in the mainstream media reports. Was this another of his “hard truths”?  His claim of “barren island” went beyond stretching and spinning the truth. To those who grew up in the mid 1900s they will know this is completely untrue. While numerous Singaporeans have disputed and mocked his claim online, his defenders said that perhaps LKY meant Singapore had no natural resources? Well, nowhere in his speech, as reported by the MSM, did he justify the description of Singapore as a barren land.

Should we give the Supremo Leader some benefit of the doubt that it was a miscommunication? If it were George Bush I might, but not LKY. Why? Simply because LKY is a master of words, a genius orator and a shrewd politician who is adept at the use of words to paint a picture and very persuasive. He knew very well the implications and image it would paint by describing Singapore as a barren island. Obviously, it would also make his achievements seem even more glorious. And as everyone knows, when LKY speaks with fire in his words and steel in his eyes, he can sound impressively convincing.

But to those who are familiar with the games played by the PAP, I am sure they are sick and tired of such show. Personally, I am appalled by the ignorance displayed by many young Singaporeans who actually believe the tall tales that Singapore was impoverished until PAP came along. Some of this ignorance came about no thanks to the brainwashing National Education and Social Studies taught at schools which paint a skewed history to portray the PAP as saviours and LKY as a legend bigger than life. Yes, there were poverty issues in Singapore back then as with every young developing country struggling to cope during the post-war years. But Singapore barren and a swamp? Not!

Let’s set the record straight once and for all with a quick history recap.

a. With due respect, Lee Kuan Yew may have been our first Prime Minister but he was NOT the Founder of Singapore as he has been so inaccurately referred to by his loyalists.  How is it possible when Singapore’s history dates back to the 11th century and beyond? The founder of Singapore has generally been traced back to a Palembang prince Sang Nila Utama who named our island Singapura or Lion City because he saw a creature that looked like a lion.

Even if detractors disagree with Sang Nila Utama as the founder, there is still Sir Stamford Raffles to contend with. He is historically recognised as the Father of Modern Singapore when the country was under British rule.

b. Singapore was also definitely Not a barren island or swamp back in the mid-1900s. The fact is that this island, by virtue of its excellent geographical location in the midst of popular trade routes, was already a thriving trade centre visited by many foreigners and traders many centuries ago. Historical findings even have records dating back the 2nd century that show evidence of  Singapore as a trading post.

As to the modern history of Singapore, it began in 1819 when Sir Stamford Raffles established a British port on the island. Under colonial rule, it grew in importance as a centre for both the India-China trade and the entrepôt trade in Southeast Asia.

By the early 1900s, Singapore was a prosperous city, one of the most modern in Southeast Asia by that time, and it was one of the word’s busiest ports. There were many shops, cafes and restaurants and fancy country clubs and hotels. Some of our iconic brands Raffles Hotel, Robinsons department store and Cold Storage supermarket are way over 100 years old!

But don’t just believe what I say.  Believe what you see. Nothing beats historical evidence in photos and videos.

 

Raffles Place in 1920s was already a bustling financial district

 

The lovely Collyer Quay area which served numerous ships calling at its port for centuries (c 1931)

 

The above pix shows how modern and developed Singapore was by the early 1900s. These pix are part of a timeline of Singapore’s development compiled by Tim Light.  His timelines show fascinating photos of some key areas like Orchard Road and Raffles Place over the years. It is a lovely journey into the past and makes one feel very proud of our nation’s transformation over the centuries. Tim used to stay in Singapore years ago and set up his webpage out of nostalgia.

For more evidence on how progressive Singapore was in the early days, watch these two  videos (here and here) that provide a rare and nostalgic look back into the 1930s and mid 1900s.

I hope that seeing the photos and watching the videos will help debunk all the lies about our country being barren pre-PAP.

To be clear, this is not a PAP bashing post as we should also accord them due credit for helping to bring even greater prosperity to the country. They also did deal with a lot of social unrest and economic problems post-war after the Japanese surrendered to the British and after Singapore was kicked out of the Federation of Malaysia in 1965. The PAP government back then, which had stalwarts like Goh Keng Swee and Toh Chin Chye, did well to introduce a slew of programmes that managed to settle the social unrest and strengthened Singapore.

But a point that must be highlighted is that when the PAP took over the running of Singapore as a Republic in 1965, our country was already blessed with invaluable assets and resources. Singapore had its AAA+ geographic location and was already well established as an important international trading city and port. And it had numerous talented and hardworking citizens including many astute entrepreneurs and tycoons who contributed enormously to the country’s development.

Some of these influential tycoons, to name a few, include Lee Kong Chian who was also known as Rubber King and Pineapple King,  spice trader Syed Abdul Rahman Alsagoff and rubber magnate and activist Tan Lak Sye who founded Nanyang University (which later became NTU).

Since independence, our government together with millions of Singaporeans had worked together and brought the country to greater heights. Our success is also due to the work of many sung and unsung heroes and heroines whose contributions should never be forgotten or downplayed just to make a select elite group look better.

Credit should always be given where it is due while hyperbolic claims and lies should also be debunked accordingly. You can fool some of the people some of the time but history has shown that the truth will out some day, always.

TOC thanks Jen for her contribution, this article first appeared on Jentrified Citizen

You May Also Like

投资、账目在官方网页坦然公开 毕丹星赞挪威主权基金“够透明”

工人党秘书长毕丹星,公开在个人脸书大赞挪威主权基金“够透明”,纳税人可以很清楚知道,国家基金被怎么用、投资在什么公司,甚至连董事会议如何投票决策,普通百姓都能上网浏览看到。 毕丹星今早在脸书发文,提及上周末在芳林公园举行的气候集会。他指出,尽管新加坡人口相对全球而言很少,但不代表我们无关紧要,反之仍可以透过全球企业行为发挥重要影响力。 他说,以管理超过一兆美元资产的挪威主权基金为例,照新加坡的标准,都算是“透明得令人难以置信”,不论是国家储备投资在哪一国、哪些企业、规模多大,甚至在所投资公司的董事会议投票决策,都能在该主权基金的官方网站,一目了然。 这种透明问责的程度是很重要的,该国人民可以浏览和理解国家的钱用在什么地方、怎么用。 毕丹星说,目前为止挪威主权基金仍重视环境永续性,在投资时也会考量环境问题,并公开调整投资项目。 毕丹星续而指出,新加坡的主权基金同样庞大,”媒体估计也达到一兆美元。淡马锡基金也声明投资会考量环境永续,不过到何种程度、其他的主权基金如政府投资公司(GIC)的做法,我们不从得知。“ ”这部分原因,正是因为基金的规模等资讯不是完全透明的。“ 毕丹星也提及,工人党将在下一次国会会议,要求环境局等各造,公开有关塑料袋生命周期的评估。 他认为,在假新闻充斥的年代,更需要拿出事实数据,才能促进有助推动环境可持续性的对话。 ”这种对话必须从问责制开始,不仅仅是那些对气候暖化视而不见的政府,更需要从金融生态系统和涉及其中的大企业开始。“

餐饮场所违反安全管理措施 三家被停业10天、四家罚款

据新加坡永续发展与环境部(MSE)今日(9月22日)所发文告指出,因违反安全管理措施,有三家餐饮场所被下令关闭,四家餐饮场所被罚款。 文告指出,政府将会继续加强对我国各餐饮场所的执法检查行动,以确保业者们能够遵守安全管理措施。 该部门职员于本月12日晚上9时10分,在香港街第39号的餐馆内,发现涉及15人的私人聚餐晚宴,食客分成四张桌子,但是互相有交流。该餐馆因此遭市区重建局官员下令暂停营业10日,从9月18日开始至27日。 同一天,位于漆街(Church Street)25号的酒吧Beer Factory在晚上9时50分,允许三组个别超过5人的食客进入餐馆,遭当局于9月17日下令,于9月18日开始暂停营业10天,直到9月27日后。 当局官员于9月19日晚上10时55分,发现有两桌食客在实龙岗中通道第261座组屋咖啡店喝酒,违法了冠状病毒19(临时援助措施)法令的禁止餐饮场所在晚上10时30分后售卖酒精饮品的条例。新加坡食品局于21日下令该饮料店暂停关闭10天,从9月22日开始至10月1日。 另外,四家被罚款的餐饮场所所触犯的条规为允许超过无人同桌、桌与桌之间的食客距离少于1米。 自9月18日至20日,政府单位已经到323个热闹的餐饮场所进行额外检查,其中18家被发现违反了安全管理措施。 当局表示会严厉审查这些违规行动,并给予适当的惩罚,包括暂时关闭和罚款。

马哈迪吁各国应理性协商调停纠纷

根据马国媒体《星报》报道,马国首相敦马哈迪表示,所有冲突应透过协商、仲裁以及法庭进行调停。 敦马于今日第25届日本经济大会《亚洲的未来》国际研讨会上发表演说,认为世界秩序已不复存在,各国需重新思考之间的关系,尤其是涉及国际冲突的部分。 “若我们想要维持良好的秩序,基于国际法准则,我们必须解决协商解决所有的问题,而不是彼此互相派送军舰对抗。”他说道。 敦马认为,在冲突面前,国家首先必须有为了达成协议而放弃一些的精神,将冲突搬上台面。 “如果要达成双赢的局面,每个人都不许准备放弃一些原则;如果我们无法擅自决定,我们应将最终裁决交给法庭,尊重法庭的裁决。” 敦马谴责激进分子的做法,表示,“当我们面对我们无法解决的问题时,一味用对抗、暴力、破坏以及杀戮的行为来平息纠纷时,显然我们仍然处于非常封建的社会。” “当我们依旧采取战争和加大我们的破坏与杀戮时,我们不能自称是文明的社会。”敦马说道。