Connect with us

Current Affairs

装修工疑偷工减料 以报纸填塞墙内空隙

Published

on

用旧报纸填充边墙空隙交差?建屋发展局昨日在其官方脸书专页,揭发某组屋单位的天台边墙的窗户边框,竟是以旧报纸填充,令住户怀疑相关组屋承包商在整修时,是否为偷工减料省成本,以报纸填塞缝隙了事。

在接获住户投诉后,建屋发展局派员前往视察,了解该单位是在1984年完成。有关住户在1999年时,为该天台处窗户进行翻新,相信是负责翻新工作的承包商,以报纸填塞连接窗户的边墙。

对此住户一直被蒙在鼓里,直到近期他打算换薪窗户,在拆下窗户时,才揭发此事。

建屋发展局在帖文中表示,经过检查已得知有关以报纸填塞的边墙缝隙,未构成结构安全威胁,不过也立即进行修补。该局称目前仍在进行调查,一旦发现有关装修承包商有失误,会马上采取行动对付。

立即就有许多网民在有关建屋局贴文留言,除了要求彻查偷工减料一事,也再引起大家对组屋品质的关注。一些网民纷纷留言申诉,在装修厕所时,还有装修工斗胆问他,有没有多余的旧报纸,好让他可以填补墙壁空间。

网民May Ngway也表示,有次装修时看见工人也这么做,立马要求他们拿出旧报纸,用真材实料补洞。


网民:空隙是否本就存在?

不过,有者就提出质疑,装修工以报纸填塞缝隙确实错了,但原本的缝隙,又是从何而来?是否有关组屋单位刚建造时,墙内本就是中空的?

Lawrence Marshall则指出,填充旧报纸绝不是好注意,许多在中国和台湾的豆腐渣工程,就是因为发展商用旧报纸来填塞建筑物结构,而导致后来发生倒塌事故。

审视公共组屋问题

其实,这已不是第一次民众揭发组屋品质问题。在2015年宏茂桥第四大道组屋居民Josephine也揭发,在拆开门框时,发现里面填塞着1998年份的报纸。

图源:All Singapore Stuff官网

在今年初,榜莪坊(Pungggol Place)第302B座组屋,走廊墙壁出现神秘的直径半米大洞,房屋经纪陈国原向《薪明日报》申诉,该墙壁因为搬动挡在前方的鞋架被移除才被发现,但是洞口重合而来无人知晓。

洞里的空间甚至能放下一张方形小桌,从洞内网上看则是第二层楼天花板。由于担心小孩玩耍时钻进洞里,加之若洞内积水会滋生蚊虫,为此屋主只得向建屋局反映,要求修补墙壁。

此外,居民陆昱斌于今年2月撰文在《联合早报》分享,其中也点出他对现有组屋品质得疑虑:虽然建组屋速度比以前快了许多,但是建筑和装修品质不升反降。

现今引进的工人都有技术和经验,但造出来的房子外表美观却不耐住,他指出他的组屋不超过10年,但是厨房的地砖前两年突然隆起并爆裂。他检查几片墙砖,也发现是空心的,令人质疑组屋质量监管不够严谨,也没考量到天气冷热变化的影响。

至于住在大巴窑芬薇组屋(Fernvale Road)第407B的居民巴拉,则向公民爆料网站STOMP申诉,在今年1月14日,组屋外墙砖突然砰裂开来;此外还有多处组屋居民都有投诉过,地砖或墙壁瓷砖突然砰裂的问题,不一而足。

半辈子积蓄买屋,烦恼一箩筐?

我们这一代用大半辈子供完的组屋,据称可延续三代,三代后就得再买新房子,因为我们的屋契只有99年,最终是要归还政府作重新规划的。

以前建组屋慢工出细活,房子住了几十年也少有问题。现今,建屋发展局虽承诺不断提升组屋建设能力和品质,但是事实是近几年网民申诉的组屋问题也层出不穷,甚至发生组屋外围结构坠落这等可能威胁居民安全的情况发生。

根据建屋发展局网站,该局宣称有监管系统保障公共组屋品质,包括要求承包商在交屋前,必须根据建屋局品质监管员的要求,修正任何失误。再者,对于新住户都会给与三年的品质保证期,涵盖天花板、漏水和墙壁脱落等问题。

不过,“尽管品管过程严格,基于一些建材的属性和劳工技术等因素,仍可能存在一些缺陷。”意即承包商所使用的材料,以及建筑工人技术参差不齐,实难确保所有组屋的品质。

建屋发展局也提及,地板瓷砖崩裂,可能是因为在较高温(如中午)时期安装地砖,但如果没考量到热胀冷缩原理,天冷瓷砖会稍微萎缩,没有足够空间让每片瓷砖伸展,就容易造成崩裂。

无论如何,居住乃是基本人权,更何况每个公民,特别是打工群体,要花半辈子时间去供完一间组屋。每个人都希望住在舒适和安全的起居空间,李总理在群众大会要人民住得安心,如何改善组屋品管也是一大挑战。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending