Connect with us

Current Affairs

酝酿社会分化加剧的“超富”新加坡社会

Published

on

国内贫富之间加剧扩大的鸿沟,致使越来越多国人不禁思考,这片土地是否仍是最初为之流汗、为后代子孙奋斗的”应许之地“,还是越发变成了少数”利益相关者“高处不胜寒的巨塔?

上周四,瑞士信贷研究院(Credit Suisse Research Institute)发布2018年全球财富报告,指新加坡人的整体财富增加7.4%至1.3万亿美元(约1.8万亿新元)。每名成年人的财富增加5.3%至28万3000美元以上,全球排名第九、亚洲领先。

在2000年,成年人均财富为11万4720美元。报告指财富增值主要因素包括较高的储蓄、资产增值和2005年至2012年间的币值汇率增值。

此外,新加坡的百万富翁增加了11.2巴仙,即18万3737人。也预测未来五年该人数将以每年增加5.5巴仙,达到23万9640人。

直至今年中,我国有大约1千名财富超过5千万美元的超高净值人士,人数增加了1.1巴仙。不过,未知有关统计是否也把我国高薪内阁成员涵括在“超高净值—疯狂巨富”群体中。

正当有些人浸淫在所谓“新加坡人变得富足”的自我感觉良好,《南华早报》在采访本地学者的报导中,却提出令人不安的事实–我国社会面临不断增长的社会分化。

会遗传的贫富差距

新加坡国立大学社会学系副教授陈恩赐,在接受《南华早报》采访时表示,现在在我国,阶级和身份背景对于社会流动的影响更大。根据衡量收入差距的基尼系数(从零到一,一为最不平等),我国自1980年以来的基尼系数就一直在0.40分以上波动,在去年则达到0.417分。

英国2015年度基尼系数为0.52、美国0.506,香港在2016年得分0.539,显示在先进国中的收入不均问题迫在眉睫。

陈恩赐指出,以新加坡为例,上一代累积的家族财富和关系等优势,可以传承给下一代,后代能在较好的条件下追求成就。相比下,其他没有同等资本和安全网的群体,却需要比前者付出更多努力。

也是李光耀公共研究院主任的陈恩赐,在去年发表的一篇论文指出,精英学校和普通学校出身的学生之间,以及住在私宅和公共组屋的居民群体,两者少有互动。

他认为,这不仅是要社会群体间友善互相敬重那么简单,而是迫切需要透过政策有效地推动社会结构改革。

南洋理工大学社会学系主任张优远教授的著作《原来贫富不均长这样》,书中阐述低收入群体的经历,探讨使他们无法脱离贫穷的社会系统。

李光耀政策研究院前助理教授、百年亚洲顾问(Centennial Asia Advisor)合伙人Donald Low表示,过去50年来新加坡奉行的精英和普及教育体系,在初期鼓励较大规模的社会阶级流动,但随后这些群体却会在各自阶级中稳定下来,长达数十年不再流动。他补充,“所有这些阶级意识和隐含的偏见,正是我们体制和政策的功能之一。”

“两种新加坡”

新加坡管理大学法律系助理教授陈庆文认为,也许在我们社会当中存在着“两种新加坡”,也强调大家有必要意识到,这种阶级分化对所有人都是有害的,尤其是那些得益于现有体制的群体。

“阶级鸿沟可威胁新加坡,加剧国人之间的对立,这种分裂让社会充斥着民粹主义和被次级国家身份所消耗。”

许多学者专家在过去十年都已积极献议各种方案,例如在薪资制度、财富税、社会开支、房屋和教育等领域进行改革,解决国内国人收入不均的问题。

但是,比起北欧国家,我国政府对社会开支的投入还是很低,高收入群体仍享有较低所得税赋,致使乐施会和非营利研究机构国际财政发展组织抨击,新加坡政府落实”有害的税制“、过低的社会开支、对女性在法律和薪资上的此事,以及未制定最低薪金制。

政府不愿对社会开支投入更多

政府当然不认同乐施会的贫富差距指数排名,社会与家庭发展部长李智陞也举例我国在医疗、教育和房屋政策,在较低开之下却能做得比许多国家卓越。

不过,李智陞并没有提到,有别于其他经合组织(OECD)国家,相比下我国政府对医疗开支的投入很少(占国民生产总值4.6巴仙),结果是国人自行为大部分的医疗开支买单(例如健保储蓄和终身健保等),来打造”领先各国“的医疗水平。

国内贫富之间加剧扩大的鸿沟,致使越来越多国人不禁思考,这片土地是否仍视最初为之流汗、为后代子孙奋斗的”应许之地“,还是越发变成了少数”利益相关者“高处不胜寒的巨塔?

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending