Connect with us

Current Affairs

接公平竞赛奖得主刘威延律师函 苏睿勇被要求撤“不实”文章

Published

on

马拉松健将苏睿勇,接到新加坡国家奥林匹克委员会(SNOC)的律师信函,要求他撤回有关2015年东南亚运动会马拉松赛的一篇文章,并且在4月9日下午5时前作出道歉。惟,苏睿勇透过律师回应拒绝了有关要求。

这篇名为“2015 SEA Games Marathon – In My Words (2015东南亚运动会马拉松赛-就我而言)”的文章,是苏睿勇于2015年6月22日(于2018年更新)在其个人部落恪“RunSohFast”发布。这位两届东南亚运动会马拉松金牌得主,在文章中细说他在4年前赢得首个金牌的经过,其中包括在抵达第一个5公里标记后,出现了意想不到的错误U弯。

他在文中是这样写道:

“接下来我预计需要回转,我寻找标志、箭头,或是一些告诉我们要回转的标志。我们看到只有一群赛道裁判员集聚在一起,但是没有发现我们已经快速接近了。我们直接越过他们,并且在他们喊着阻止,“走错了!回来!”时,我们才停下。我们转回来,平衡力发生了变化。原本跑在前方带领大家走上错误路线的领队,现在处于后方,然后追回来前方。到目前为止一直处于最后的队友Ashley(刘威延),现在反而跑在我们前端,只因为我们转错了弯。没有人放慢速度等待,比赛依旧进行着。”

他随后表示对有关事态转变感到非常生气,但是设法冷静自己,专注于目前的重要任务。他在文章中描述了他尽力冲刺,并且慢慢的回到队伍前端,超越了其他参赛者,并最终成功从曾于东南亚运动会5千米和1万米马拉松赛项目取得10个金牌的泰国队的本滕•士力頌(Boonthung Srisung)手中,夺下金牌的经过。

去年10月指“后悔没早点说出来”

有关的文章是苏睿勇于2015年写下的。事实上,在去年10月,苏睿勇就公开在脸书指出,其队友刘威延被指在领跑选手转错弯,仍体现体育精神,放弃领先优势的事迹不实。

他曾表示“唯一后悔的,就是没有早点说出来”,三年前没有道出自己所了解的事实真相,是因为他当时以为,刘威延可能觉得自己成绩不佳(第八),需要借这说辞安慰自己。

本地马拉松选手刘威延(照片:SNOC/Facebook Soh Rui Yong)

苏睿勇表示,他没想到这虚构事迹,在三年里不断被重复报导,刘威延也因为这件事,荣获两项本就不实的体育精神奖项。

“故事很好,但不是真实的”,苏睿勇说,这让他觉得有必要停止这一切的幻想。

他指出,直到今天都没有任何佐证来证明此事。

刘威延因为等候其他选手的事迹,获得新加坡奥委会颁发的体育精神特别奖,以及国际公平比赛委员会颁发的“顾拜旦公平竞赛奖”

对于苏睿勇的指控,奥运委会指出在上周向他发律师函,要求他撤下有关的文章,并且发出道歉启事。不过后者也不甘示弱,在脸书贴文写道“不会退缩”。

他指出,“与其采取法律行动耗费公共资源,如果奥林匹克委员会选择了和参与的各方进行会谈,对新加坡体育运动的未来会更好”。

他表示,作为一个公共组织,奥运委会应该公平对待各方,即使大家意见或许不同。“寻找问题的解决方案比发出律师信函更具建设性,与其浪费资源不如善用它来支持我们运动员。”

他提醒道,“新加坡和新加坡国民看着”。

奥委会撤诉讼

4月10日清晨1时,苏睿勇在脸书上宣布,该委员会已撤销法律诉讼。他表示,为了取得2015年东南亚运动会马拉松赛的真相,他将会和刘威延(Ashley Liew)直接对质。

刘威延首次回应

据《海峡时报》报导,目前刘威延已透过Mark Teng of That.律师事务所,对苏睿勇发出律师信,要求后者收回言论并道歉。

刘威延也首次针对此事回应,指其个人立场不倾向回应,保持沉默并不是默认错误,而是希望将冲突降级。但事情发展至此,不得不打破沉默来厘清事件。

对于有者要求提供当时追踪赛事行程的数据,刘威延的管理公司ONEathlete指出,刘参加2015年的那场马拉松赛事时,并没有穿戴有卫星定位功能的手表。

此外,奥委会也指出苏睿勇的指控,对于把刘威延举荐给公平竞赛委员会的奥委会来说,已对该委会信誉构成诽谤。

网民力挺公布事实真相

网民对此纷纷表态,但是大部分网民都很支持苏睿勇的决定。

有者则认为,应该将此案件带上法庭,这样我们就知道刘威延的声誉是否被大众肯定,当然苏睿勇的声誉也会受到影响。

“苏睿勇在《海峡时报》报导中,指这一点是一件微不足道的事,其实并非如此。”

网民也表示,经此一事,他和同伴们的声誉都会受到严重打击。

网民也建议苏睿勇事先应该反过来指责相关委员会涉及诽谤他的情况,“难道不是吗?”

网民也呼吁苏睿勇专注在2019年的奥林匹克马拉松赛,其他的就先放一边吧。

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending