Connect with us

Current Affairs

统计局称本地居民平均月入1万1780元

Published

on

今日,本地中英主流媒体都有刊载来自新加坡统计局发布的数据,该局公布五年一度的家庭开支调查报告,其中指出,本地居民平均每月家庭收入达到1万1780元,高于2012/13年的约1万零470元,年均增幅约2.4巴仙。

但是一些网民对于这样的数据感到“难以置信”,这是因为家庭月入1万1780元,假设家中有两夫妻同时打工,平均两人收入达到5890元,但事实上许多人的薪资根本没有那么高。

之前有网民分享,一名外卖快递员若勤劳工作,每月收入可达到四千余元,而也有青年开私召车,每月确实可净赚5000元,但那也要每日不间断开车12-14小时、平均载客20-25趟才有办法赚到。

另外还记得本社此前报导,总统府聘请管家和厨师的招聘广告?助理高级管家的薪酬大约在1400-2000元之间,并以2000至2500元之间薪资招聘厨师。

而根据人力部的数据,专业厨师(40-49岁)中位数薪资,约为3532元,而扣除公积金后,所得也至少有2826元。

所以让我们假定:某家庭两夫妻都出外挣钱,丈夫开私召车每月净赚五千元,而妻子是餐馆专业厨师,扣除公积金后带回家收入2826元,加起来也只有7826元,哪有统计局公布的那么多?

根据统计局定义,居民指的是,以新加坡公民或永久居民为一家之主的家庭,而家庭收入包括雇佣收入、经商收入和其他非工作所得收入如投资、租金收益和政府津贴等等。

与此同时,本地居民平均每月家庭开销达到4910元,但年均增幅比起2012/13年仅为0.8巴仙,故此,统计局得出结论,五年期间家庭收入增长快于家庭开支。

报告也指收入最高20巴仙家庭收入增长最慢,年均增长为1.6巴仙;住在一房式和二房式组屋的家庭,收入增长最快,年均增长6.3巴仙。

报告指出,收入最低20巴仙家庭,17/18年平均每月开支2570元,比平均月入2235元超出300元,他们的家庭开支增长也最快。

网民:为何不公布中位数收入?

对于统计局的报告,网民并不买账,一些网民认为,理应展示国民中位数收入才比较能反映实况,因为平均收入,就意味着低收入群体和高收入群体的收入总和起来再平均,结果就显得收入比较高了。

Angel Wings:平均家庭月入是相关差劲的生活水准指标。其中有人月入一万、但有者才月入两千,根本不能相提并论。

网民Cheah Koh Keong也提出,也有可能现如今许多青年继续和仍在职的父母同住,故此才显得家庭收入比较高。

Desiree Lim就分析,假设月入一万元,两千块就要用在各种日用品和生活永飞、四千元用在三名孩子的学前教育、一千元孝敬两老、三千元还屋贷和管理费等,这还不包括保险,即便月入一万生活也不容易。

Mohd Rafiq:骗人,难道没有向在物流、客服等领域的蓝领阶级做民调吗?一万余元对蓝领阶层来说几乎不可能,如果他们都有五千元的月入,那就皆大欢喜了。

忽略失业、零工收入和退休者

至于在《联合早报》,也有许多读者揶揄统计局报告形同”自己讲自己爽“,而且也无法反映那些失业、退休和打零工等群体的生活情况。

有者也反讽,之所以家庭开支减少,因为物价和基本生活费用都增长,再涨消费税,恐怕开销增加就要负增长了!

 

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending