Connect with us

Current Affairs

台湾知名健身达人看似健康却中风! 妻子曝光关键原因

Published

on

37岁台湾知名健身达人“筋肉爸爸”因经常在网络上分享运动心得而闻名,更多次受邀成为综艺节目的嘉宾。看似身体健康的他却在近日传出中风的消息,令人震惊。

妻子“筋肉妈妈”于中秋节(13日)当天向粉丝公开“筋肉爸爸”中风的消息,亦解释“筋肉爸爸”倒下的来龙去脉。

据“筋肉妈妈”表示,上周“筋肉爸爸”在送孩子上学后睡回笼觉,却被“筋肉妈妈”发现不对劲,后来才得知他中风了,便及时送到医院急诊,当时在经过脑断层扫描后被诊断出是脑部栓塞,但因为在三小时内送达,经评估后可以打脑栓塞溶剂。

但脑栓塞溶剂是有风险的,据“筋肉妈妈”说,医生告知在施打后会有6巴仙的机率成脑溢血,全身血管都会起作用,因此需要在加护病房内观察监测,同时也必须向“筋肉妈妈”发出病危通知书。

而“筋肉妈妈”在期间一直为此事忙碌,仍未强烈感受到危机,直到病危通知书交到手上,被要求要签名时,“筋肉妈妈”一瞬间天崩地裂,难以接受,甚至已经忘了如何回到家中。

“筋肉妈妈”表示,她无法接受自己的丈夫上周还在陪着她度假,而这一刻却已经在床上与死神搏斗。在心慌意乱之时,她仅仅记得某些琐碎的记忆片段,有一刻她朋友告诉他一些医疗资讯而她无法拿定主意,下意识发信息问“筋肉爸爸”,却发现他已经无法回他。

她也知道自己不能再此时倒下,必须照顾协助“筋肉爸爸”完成工作教学,同时兼顾自己的工作,还需要照顾孩子,幸好身边的家人一直给予他协助,才能让他好好完成工作。

“筋肉爸爸”持续昏沉很多天,即便从加护病房转移到普通病房,却一直昏睡不停,就连医生也感觉到奇怪,于是开始探究“筋肉爸爸”的作息,才发现中风原因。

尽管他的血脂、胆固醇、血压、内脏脂肪均属标准,但在检查家族病史检测后发现,家族一直都有凝血功能问题,容易出现凝血状况,当中也有一些亲戚就死于心血管疾病,加上年轻、不断运动、经常性健康检查的他,更容易忽略家族病史,同时仗着年轻的体力经常熬夜、睡回笼觉、一天睡眠不超过六小时,可能出现过劳的情况。

据悉,因为过劳加上家族病史伤害到了控制右边肢体运动神经的大脑,中风了!

文内最后也表示现在的筋肉爸爸也展开复健之路,也因为身体质量好的关系,康复速度也快,她们也因这件事开始力行早睡,重视健康生活。

中风不仅仅局限在老年,亦可能出现在更年轻的年龄层

中风近年来,因为生活形态的改变,导致中风的比例上升。据悉,我国约有3.65巴仙的居民曾有过中风经验,而且每年约有9000人中风,意味着每日预计将会有多达26宗中风案会发生,可想而知其比例有多高。值得注意的是,我们对于中风的刻板印象是认为只有老人会出现,但有研究指出近5年来男性25岁至64岁中风病例平均增长9%。

医疗机构Singhealth指出,中风可分为两种:缺血性中风以及出血性中风。缺血性中风(Ischaemic stroke)是指因血管堵塞而出现脑血液流量不足,是常见的小中风现象,约七成的人患有此病,是国人常见的中风类型,在中风后的一周至三个月内,很可能会再度发中风现象,因此需控制好中风的诱因,才可降低复发的风险。;出血性中风(Haemorrhagic stroke)则是因血管硬化而导致脑血管破裂,俗称“爆血管”,患者多达24巴仙。

中风的原因均来自血管异样出现供血不足的现象,造成脑部的损毁,因此在中风前可以先透过一些迹象得知,比较著名的方式是FAST快速检测方式:

F(Face脸):微笑!当脸部两侧不对称或一侧嘴角歪斜,可能出现异常。

A(Arm手臂):举起双手!当让患者闭眼,双臂平举10秒,有一侧手臂无力往下掉,可能出现异常。

S(Speech说话):流利对答!问一个问题,吐字不清、说不明白或无法说话,可能出现异常。

T(Time时间):如果有上述其中一个状况出现,请马上拨打急救电话995,争取抢救时间,尽快行溶栓治疗。

此外,还有其他症状包括其中一侧的身体(脸部、手臂、脚)突然出现麻痹的状态、突然晕眩、失去平衡或不协调、莫名剧烈头痛、单眼或双眼远视困难。

中风很危险,仍可采取一些措施避免

虽然中风总是来得猝不及防,但仍然可以采取一些措施减少中风的危险例如定时测量血压,血压一旦超过140/90 mmHg,将提高患高血压的可能,因此透过药物或健康的生活作息维持血压在低于130/80 mmHg。

再来,饮食上的控制协助降低血糖水平,避免过高的血糖将损毁血脉与神经线,以及维持标准的胆固醇水平,避免食用过多高胆固醇和高饱和脂肪的食物如椰奶、炸物、海鲜等等。

另外维持健康的生活模式例如少抽烟、维持均衡体重、规律运动,也能够减低患有中风的可能。

最后是听从医生意见食用适当的药物,以及规律的健康检查,这样可以提早避免各种症状出现如高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇。如果曾有中风的经验,亦必须遵从医生的指示服用特定的药物。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending