PM Lee Signing CECA with Indian PM

In 2009, the China-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (CSFTA) came into force. This is China’s first comprehensive bilateral FTA with an Asian country.
China is said to be Singapore’s largest trading partner while Singapore is China’s largest foreign investor since 2013.
In 2017, Singapore’s cumulative investment in China amounted to S$140 billion while China’s cumulative investment in Singapore amounted to S$36.3 billion.
Under the agreement, both countries are allowed to facilitate the free “movement of natural persons” to each other country. It facilitates temporary entry of natural persons for the purpose of trade while recognising the need to ensure border security and to protect the domestic labour force in the territories of both parties.
In essence, the agreement facilitates the movement of the following people:
(a) Business visitors;
(b) Contractual services suppliers; or
(c) Intra-corporate transferees.
Under the agreement, Singapore will allow a Chinese business visitor to stay for a period of up to 60 days with extension for further 30 days. This is for Chinese holders of 5-year multiple journey visa. For holders of all other visas, Singapore will grant the right to temporary entry for a period of up to 30 days, which may be extended for a further 30 days.
In the case of contractual services suppliers, the person must have been a PMET employee of the service supplier for at least 1 year preceding the date of their application for admission. Entry is limited to 90 days with possibility for a further extension of up to 90 days, provided the total does not exceed 180 days or the length of the service contract, whichever is shorter. That is, the maximum stay allowed in Singapore is 6 months for Chinese PMET on contract to provide a service in Singapore by his or her service supplier in China.
For intra-corporate transferees, the person must have been in the prior employ of their firms outside Singapore for a minimum of 1 year preceding the date of their application for admission. Their stay is limited to 2 years but can be extended for periods of up to 3 additional years each time, for a total term of not more than 8 years.
Singapore more generous to India
In contrast, Singapore is more generous to India when comes to CECA.
Under CECA, Indian business visitors with a 5-year multiple journey visa are granted temporary entry for a period of up to two months with further extension for another. Those with less than 5-year multiple journey visa are granted temporary entry for a period of up to one month.
For contractual services suppliers and intra-corporate transferees, the terms are similar to that of CSFTA. The only difference is that for CECA’s intra-corporate transferees, they must have been employed by the company for not less than 6 months before he or she can be qualified for the transfer to the host country.
However, in the case of CECA, there is an additional category stipulated in the agreement (Article 9.5) for the so-called “long-term temporary entry” professionals:

Each Party shall grant temporary entry and stay for up to one year or the duration of contract, whichever is less, to a natural person seeking to engage in a business activity as a professional, or to perform training functions related to a particular profession, including conducting seminars, if the professional otherwise complies with immigration measures applicable to temporary entry, on presentation by the natural person concerned of:
(a) Proof of nationality of the other Party;
(b) Documentation demonstrating that he or she will be so engaged and describing the purpose of entry, including the letter of contract from the (business) party engaging the services of the natural person in the host Party (country); and
(c) Documentation demonstrating the attainment of the relevant minimum educational requirements or alternative credentials.

In other words, the professional is essentially contracted to work in the host country for up to 1 year. Since nothing is said in the agreement denying the professional’s renewal of his or her contract, it is presumed that he or she can continue to work in the host country to “finish up” the contracted work as long as the contract is continually renewed by the the business party who is actively engaging the professional in the host country.
CECA also specified 127 different occupations that the professional can engage in the host country as long as they have equivalent degrees conferred by institutions in India and Singapore.
And under CECA, intra-corporate transferees as well as “long-term temporary entry” professionals are allowed to bring in their spouses or dependants into the host country. They are allowed to “work as managers, executives or specialists, subject to the relevant licensing, administrative and registration requirements”.
“Such spouses or dependants can apply independently in their own capacity (and not necessarily as accompanying spouses or dependants) and shall not be barred by the Party granting them the right to work from taking up employment in a category other than that of managers, executives, or specialists solely on the ground that they as the accompanying spouses or dependants are already employed in its territory as managers, executives or specialists,” CECA stated.
In other words, the spouses or dependants can work in non-PMET jobs in the host country.
Clauses relating to the employment of “long-term temporary entry” professionals as well as employment of spouses or dependants are not found in the same chapter (“movement of natural persons”) in CSFTA. Only CECA has them.
So, in summary, the main difference pertaining to the “movement of natural persons” chapter between the 2 agreements is:-
CECA:

CSFTA:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

"It is not clear that the PAP has the ability to come up with practical solutions," says SDP's Dr Paul Tambyah

“It is not clear that the PAP has the ability to come…

31 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 19 cases in the community

As of Saturday noon (14 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

MOH: Suspected case is not linked to pneumonia cluster in Wuhan

The first suspected case of pneumonia, involving a 3-year-old female Chinese national…

“仿佛回到4月份前情景” 网友叹地铁内人潮重现

大部分工作领域在6月2日恢复运作,地铁内乘客很多,网友感叹“一夜之间,恢复到4月份之前的景象”。 网友Kingstom Hong在脸书群组“走,新加坡”上载了一张照片,只见昨日(6月2日)的地铁内坐满人群,虽然都戴着口罩,但是无法确定每个人都保持安全社交距离,而且几乎都是“低头族”。 网友也在帖文中写到,“一夜之间,恢复到4月份之前的景象,06/02”,不少网民都表示赞同和会心一笑。 网民对此景看法不一,有人觉得这是繁荣的景象,至少大家都有工作做,有者甚至表示“上MRT都没位子坐”,“我们要和冠病19一起生活”、“没法子,每个人都要找吃养家”。但是有者则认为这是非常有风险的行为,因为随时都会导致病毒传染情况加剧。 网友王云甚至分享到,他在昨日下午三时许乘巴士到裕廊东政府医院门口的巴士站时,见十余名学生聚在一起等巴士,“如有一个中病毒,可说全部都被传染到,看了真伤脑筋”。