Connect with us

Community

Online users express different reactions towards distribution of GST Vouchers

Published

on

930,000 Singaporeans residing in Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats will be given GST Vouchers this month. The Utility-Save (U-Save) rebate is part of the permanent GST Voucher scheme is and distributed every three months.

The rebate is up to S$100 depending on the type of HDB flat. Eligible households will continue to receive the voucher regardless of their electricity provider meanwhile non-eligible households are households whose members own more than one property.

Deputy Prime Minister, Heng Swee Keat said, the GST rate will increase from 7 to 9 per cent at the People’s Action Party (PAP) convention at the Singapore Expo. Although urged by party activists to not speak of it, he defended by saying it is a responsible action to inform the people about it.

“If I don’t bring it up, the opposition parties will – so it’s better that you hear it directly from me,” said Mr Heng. “You have my commitment that we will help Singaporeans cope with the change,” he added.

The rebate announcement has triggered various reactions from online users. Penning their opinion on Facebook pages of The Online Citizen, Channel NewsAsia and The Straits Time. Certain online users are replying sarcastically towards the situation. They seem to view it as a mere joke set by the government.

Some of them are saying that it is unfair for only HDB residents to receive the voucher. The income of each household can’t be verified, in order to be considered qualified to receive the rebate. Some HDB households may have higher income compared to residents who aren’t residing there.

Melvin Tan said his friends with high incomes live in the HDB flats which makes the distribution unfair. It goes against the purpose of the rebate.

A number of online users are expressing that the voucher will not offset their monthly utility bills. The price hike will merely balance out the voucher amount to the utility bills. They voice out that some citizens will not understand the calculations behind it and assume it is profiting them. Few online users have given examples of how they feel about the entire situation as well.

Meanwhile, some urge citizens to accept what is given and not complain about it. They explain how it is the people’s money that is spent by the Government for the rebate. “Complaining will not do anything for us,” said Adawiyah Nur Qarirah Nuwairah. She further added that complaints are not Governments concern and asked citizens to work any type of job to save up for personal funding.

Suggestions are also expressed in the Facebook page comments. They prefer big amounts to be spent on other more troubling situations that are occurring. Marc Ho Ban Loon pointed out ten different ways the Government could help citizens and country. Lawrence Teo urged the government to release certain percentage of Central Provident Fund (CPF) before the next election instead of GST.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Community

Singapore performer impersonating Sivaji Ganesan dies after collapse during live show

Asokan S/O Muniyandy, a Singaporean performer famed for his impersonation of Indian actor Sivaji Ganesan, passed away on 12 October at the age of 60. Dubbed the “Singapore Sivaji,” he collapsed after a performance. His final rites will take place on 15 October at 5 pm.

Published

on

By

SINGAPORE: Singaporean performer Asokan S/O Muniyandy, renowned for his impersonation of Tamil cinema legend Sivaji Ganesan, passed away on Saturday (12 Oct) at the age of 60.

Known as “Singapore Sivaji” for his uncanny resemblance to the iconic actor, Asokan was a regular performer at cultural events in Singapore and Malaysia.

He reportedly collapsed and died at the end of a live performance, leaving the audience in shock.

Videos circulating on social media show Asokan dancing moments before he suddenly collapsed face-first as the emcee spoke to the crowd.

The sudden incident left onlookers stunned.

Seithi Mediacorp reported that Asokan’s final rites will take place on Tuesday (15 Oct) at 5 p.m.

Continue Reading

Animals

Controversy erupts as NParks sets traps for wild chickens following resident complaints

A video showing NParks contractors trapping wild chickens in Yio Chu Kang has sparked online controversy. Many netizens criticize the agency for targeting harmless chickens while ignoring more disruptive animals. They argue that chickens contribute to the local charm and should be preserved instead of culled, raising questions about the complaints received.

Published

on

By

SINGAPORE: A video showing contractors hired by the National Parks Board (NParks) laying chicken traps has ignited controversy online.

The incident occurred in the Cactus estate, located in Yio Chu Kang.

The video, first uploaded on 9 October to the Facebook group Singapore Wildlife Sightings, shows two men in green vests kneeling on a grass patch and setting up what appeared to be traps for wild chickens.

According to the original post, the contractors were responding to complaints from local residents.

In response to media inquiries from MS News, Mr How Choon Beng, NParks’ Group Director of Wildlife Management, confirmed that both NParks and the Cheng San Grassroots Organisation had received numerous complaints about free-ranging chickens in the Cactus and Sunrise estates over the past year.

The complaints cited issues related to disturbances caused by the chickens, referred to as “dis-amenities.”

Mr How explained that NParks is currently conducting “population management measures” to address the growing number of chickens in the area.

He emphasized that NParks adopts a science- and community-based approach to managing animal populations, including free-ranging chickens.

These efforts include studying the birds’ population ecology, conducting biosurveillance programs, and implementing a variety of management strategies such as public education and habitat modification.

Mr How noted, “There is no one-size-fits-all management approach when it comes to addressing the multi-faceted issues related to free-ranging chickens.”

In addition, NParks collaborates with Grassroots Organisations to promote best practices in population control and engages residents by sharing tips on managing disturbances caused by the chickens, including the removal of eggs.

NParks also reminded the public to avoid feeding the chickens, as this contributes to their overpopulation and exacerbates the problem.

Netizens criticize NParks for trapping and culling wild chickens

Under an MS News Facebook post, many netizens expressed their opposition to the trapping and culling of wild chickens, arguing that they are harmless creatures.

Some users commented that they enjoy the presence of chickens, as they contribute to a “kampong” atmosphere in the neighbourhood.

One user mentioned that it is always nice to see chickens roaming around, helping to create that nostalgic vibe of home.

Another user shared their fondness for the sight of chickens, stating it feels reminiscent of the kampong days.

They suggested that instead of targeting chickens, NParks should focus on managing more disruptive animals like pigeons and otters, which can be a nuisance.

Several commenters questioned why NParks would catch harmless chickens while allowing other animals that pose more significant issues, like otters and pigeons, to remain unchecked.

One user criticized NParks for wasting time on chickens, emphasizing that they do not pose any threat to the public, unlike otters or wild boars that have attacked people.

Another commenter pointed out that chickens play a role in controlling harmful insects and pests, while otters contribute to the removal of pet fish in local ponds.

Others urged NParks to prioritize addressing the pressing issues posed by crows and pigeons rather than focusing on roaming chickens.

Many argued that NParks should aim to preserve nature by leaving harmless chickens alone and managing genuine pests instead.

A frustrated user criticized the authorities for succumbing to complaints rather than making decisions based on what is right.

They recalled a personal experience at Alexandra Village hawker centre, where they admired a group of wild chickens with a Malaysian worker, only to learn that authorities planned to cull them due to complaints.

One user questioned the nature of these complaints, urging NParks to clarify what is so problematic about having chickens in the neighbourhood.

They argued that these animals are harmless, self-sufficient, and do not bother humans.

As urban development continues to encroach on their natural habitats, many believe it is unjust to deny them the right to coexist with people in their own neighbourhoods.

Continue Reading

Trending