Connect with us

Current Affairs

李显扬:先打倒冠病19 选举须暂缓

Published

on

(翻译自李显扬刊载于《马来邮报》的评论

基于冠状病毒19 本地传播病例已超过入境病例,新加坡目前已启动“断路器”式的半封锁措施。本月3日,总理李显龙称关闭学校、非必要服务商店和工作场所的措施,旨在防堵感染传播。

经过数周的担忧后,许多国人终于松了一口气,当局采取更严谨措施来保护他们免受病毒侵害。然而,仍然有强烈的感觉,在这场健康危机的关键时刻,国家的关注重心被迫分散。 4月7日,当国人将在“阻断”措施下准备呆在家里,人民行动党(PAP)却将在国会推动通过《国会选举(冠病19特别安排)法案》

这法案似乎显示,行动党把它和李总理的利益凌驾于家国之上。执政党似乎仍执迷于在还有整整一年任期的情况下,如何在疫情下召开选举,更何况世卫组织(WHO)已宣称这场疫情为“您能想象到的最强劲敌”。

敦促国人“相信自己为国家利益而非个人”,但李总理却无法放下即将举行的选举,令人莫名其妙。

既然行动党不太可能败选,为何那么焦急于选举?难道是畏惧经济衰退的恶果?需提出的问题是:政府是否过于被动或做得太少,只是为了避免惊动人民或限制对经济的损失?有多大程度因为提早选举的渴望而分神?

当前,新加坡理应得到总理和他团队的全盘关注,对那些每日面对感染风险的前线医护人员,予以尊重。然而, 当新感染群仍在涌现,执政党却把宝贵的时间精力都浪费在选举安排上。

新加坡应对疫情的手法获得世界赞许,也提及过去2003年SARS疫情习得许多宝贵经验。SARS疫情时,出现首位病患的26天后,就关闭学校。但这一次,自1月23日出现首宗病例以来,过了70天才关闭。这就不能怪国人的质疑:如果SARS是一场教训,何以会出现如此过度的拖延?

SARS疫情出现238例确诊病例。但今年4月1日冠病19确诊人数就破千,截至4日已达到1114例。这可不同于其他战疫。冠病19比起SARS更具传染力,感染链也极其困难打破。为提早选举分心,行动党是否失察?国人是否感受到政府有把公民的福祉摆在首位?

世界各地政府已宣布紧急状态,将近三分之一人口受封锁措施影响。新加坡似乎显得反应较慢,委婉地提出诸如“断路器”或“居家学习”等提升防疫措施。

李显龙在周五做出宣布后,他的部长们还得进一步详加解释为何需要落实这些新措施。但新加坡还停留在橙色警戒。各种迷因和玩笑在网络传开,对比警戒状态和总理的领带颜色,究竟是橙还是红,以及国家现状的真实信号等。

新加坡人理应感到愤怒,现任领导层似乎搞错了工作重点,似乎对严峻现实视而不见。明确宣布未来数月不选举,反而能让人们的恐惧得到缓解。

李总理称,他需要获得强大的委托才能处理疫情。他还有12个月任期且在国会占据93席的超级优势。难道现在的委托还不足以让他在当前局势带领新加坡?

提出特别法案,显示执政党持续发出提早选举的信号。若在疫情未完全受控、仍在施虐下召开选举,将公然地把百姓性命置于不必要的风险中。没有新加坡人民、公务员、警察、志愿者等愿意冒的风险。强制投票意味着那些弱势群体,特别是老弱年长者可能被迫曝露于危机下。

新加坡当前亟需全神贯注,采取所有必要的措施打败疫情。反之,疫情下召开选举反而可能让病例急剧上升。

若说什么时候更期盼如李光耀般的直言不讳、当机立断的老一辈领导们,恐怕是现在。直爽和开放永远都是李光耀的标志。过去的人民行动党,依据新加坡百姓利益决策,把众人利益摆在首位。对此国人到不曾怀疑过这位开国元勋。每一代的续任领袖,都应赢取这种信任。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending