Connect with us

Current Affairs

GE2020 marked by several police reports filed during the campaign period

Published

on

GE2020 was marked this time around with a number of police reports lodged by parties and citizens alike over various things from damaged campaign posters to statements made by various candidates and alleged falsehoods.

For some of these reports, the Singapore Police Force (SPF) released statements confirming that they were indeed filed. However, there are others which the SPF didn’t directly address, leaving on social media postings and screenshots showing the reports.

In total, we counted 13 reports filed during the campaign period until the Polling Day, 30 June to 10 July.

1 & 2 July 2020

The campaign period started off with a few police reports filed over damaged election posters. There were quite a few of these by both the People’s Action Party (PAP) and the Progress Singapore Party (PSP)

On 1 July, a report was filed by the PAP over one of the damage of their election posters in the area of Hougang Avenue 10. Just a day later, the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) lodged a similar police report about their damaged election posters along Bukit Batok Avenue 5 and Hougang Ave 10.

The SPF said in a statement that a 51-year old and a 13-year old were being investigated for those two separate cases.

4 & 5 July July 2020

Another poster related police report was filed by the PAP on 4 July over damaged election posters in Woodlands Street 13. This time, a 48-year old man was arrested for allegedly damaging those posters.

There were also reports made against several candidates who were running in the election. Two reports were filed, on 4 and 5 July, against Workers’ Party (WP)’s Raeesah Khan who stood for election and won in Sengkang GRC. The report alleged that she made comments on her social media pages a while back which promoted enmity between different racial and religious groups. Investigations are ongoing.

The SPF said investigations are ongoing.

6 July 2020

Following this, a citizen lodged a report against the PAP’s statement about Ms Khan. A citizen on Facebook revealed on Monday (6 July) that he has filed this report to “hold the PAP accountable for an ‘offence of promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race under Section 298A of the Penal Code’ as well as the spreading of online falsehoods.”

On this, the SPF released a statement to say that no offence was found after consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers.

7 July 2020

Another report also arose from this specifically against a Facebook user who claimed to be one of the first people to “leak” Ms Khan’s earlier social media comments which are now the subject of a police investigation. SPF confirmed on 7 July that reports were filed against the Facebook user who goes by “Abdul Malik Mohammed Ghazali” on the platform.

“The Police are looking into the alleged offences of posting comments on social media with deliberate intent to wound religious or racial feelings under Section 298 of the Penal Code and harassment under Section 4 of the Protection from Harassment Act,” the SPF asserted.

Police investigations are currently ongoing.

Separately on a similar allegation as that made against Ms Khan, another report was lodged on 7 July against PAP’s Heng Swee Keat—who contested and won in East Coast GRC—in relation to his response to a question posed to him at a student’s forum in 2019 at Nanyang Technology University where he said that he doesn’t think Singapore is ready for a non-Chinese Prime Minister.

However in this case, the SPF said that the Attorney-General’s Chambers advice was that no offence was committed and that Mr Heng’s remarks, in context, “do not evidence any intent to wound anyone’s racial feelings or promote enmity between different races.”

On 7 July, a police report was filed against PAP’s Ong Ye Kung for allegedly abetting a primary school child to participate in election activity. This was in relation to a video he had earlier shared on Facebook of him talking to a boy in school uniform. The video was taken down on 2 July after Mr Ong was informed by authorities that it is not in line with electoral rules.

The person who filed the report told TOC that the police informed him that they have begun investigations in to the matter.

8 July

PSP also lodged another poster damage police report on 8 July, this time over posters in Jurong West Street 92.

On the same day, a report was filed against PAP’s Bukit Batok SMC candidate over alleged falsehood made in a video in which Mr Pillai talked about a “scurrilous attack” against his family.”

The report alleged that there was no evidence of any video to have surfaced which “attacked” Mr Pillai’s son’s criminal history as he has said in the video. As such, the report alleged, “there is reason to believe that Murali Pillai contravened the POFMA act. He has spread fakenews based on falsehood.”

Also on 8 July, The Online Citizen (TOC) editor Terry Xu filed a police report against a commentary Facebook page Critical Spectator on Tuesday (7 July), over its posts made in relation to the ongoing General Election (GE), citing foreign intervention. In the report it was noted that Michael Petraeus is the man behind the Facebook page and that he is a Polish national.

After the report was filed, Facebook unpublished the Critical Spectator page from its platform.

10 July 2020

On 10 July, a police report was lodged by a citizen against former ambassador-at-large Bilahari Kausikan over a Facebok post he made on Cooling Off Day (9 July) in which he rebuked PSP’s Lee Hsien Yang, who is the younger son of founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. The report alleged that the post sought to “influence the public on election partisan politics”.

Continue Reading
5 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending