Connect with us

Current Affairs

Students petition MOE to stop using device management application on students’ laptops due to privacy and security concerns

Published

on

In the midst of heated public discussions relating to the Singapore government’s purported encroachment of the privacy of its citizens, a petition has cropped up calling for the Ministry of Education (MOE) to halt its plan of installing device management applications (DMA) on personal learning devices of students.

On 23 January, a Singapore student started a petition titled, “Stop MOE from implementing DMA (Device management application) on students’ laptops.”

It garnered over 2,000 signatures in just 14 hours. At the time of writing, it has over 2,300 signatories.

The MOE intends to install these DMAs on students’ devices be it devices that have been purchased or are on loan from the school as well as personal ones that they are using for the purposes of home-based learning.

The MOE touts three main functions of this application which are classroom management, mobile device management and user management. In essence, the application would allow educations to control and monitor the device, remotely deploy programs at their own discretion, and restrict the usage of the devices.

The petition states:

“We students are unhappy that the MOE requires such a program to be installed on our PLDs, be it our personal ones or ones purchased from the school, due to how little control, freedom, and privacy we have.

“This may also put many students’ information and data at risk to hackers, as they can easily access the data if such program is breached.”

Students are expected to have personal learning devices due to the implementation of the National Digital Literacy Programme for schools and institutes of higher learning which aims to strengthen digital literacy.

One component of that is the Personalised Digital Learning Programme (PDLP), which requires that every secondary school student owns a laptop that is either purchased or loaned from the school,  or purchased on their own, by the end of this year.

To help all students afford a personal learning device, a one-off EduSave top-up of S$200 was given to every student last year.

The author of the petition argues that apart from grave security concerns and the breach of privacy, there is still the concern that the DMA doesn’t actually address the root of the problem, which is a lack of self-regulation by students.

The author notes, that even if the DMA is “truly foolproof” and free from security risks, “Blocking the computer will not result in students suddenly acquiring a stupendous amount of self-discipline.”

“Will the DMA help students become more mature? Will it bring about lasting behavioural benefits? Will it solve the root of the problem in the long term? Or will it bring about temporary, superficial, short term consent, at the cost of a permanent opinion malus, a hatred of authority, and a loss of privacy?”

The petition proposes that the money spent on developing and acquiring the DMA could have been better spent on further subsidising laptops for less privileged students and other things like “more in-depth and better training for Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) teachers, researching and developing new and relevant pedagogies, and investing in experiential learning techniques”.

The petition also suggests the MOE to roll out monitoring systems controlled by parents instead, as parents are better able to calibrate suitable time limits for their child, taking into account each individual needs and abilities.

Schools have autonomy to control and restrict PLD usage

TOC understand that schools were informed that the DMA has to be installed in all student devices before they can be used for teaching and learning purposes. Parents are to be briefed about this.

Should parents not allow the DMA to be installed on their child’s personal device, the school has the option of loaning a device to the students, but only during school hours and not beyond that.

On the question of who manages parental control on the device, it was noted that the school should be the one to maintain control and that the school has autonomy in structuring the control of device management.

For example, the school can enable parental controls after school hours, during the weekends, and on school holidays, thus giving parent the option to control and manage the device. However, it is explicitly stated that parents would not be able to override the base restrictions set by the school.

With the DMA, the school and teachers can decide which applications can be installed on students’ devices. They can also block “inappropriate websites with adult and extremist content”, as well as restrict gaming websites and applications. The DMA will also enable teachers to monitor students usage of the device. The discretion on what applications and websites are allowed or disallowed lies with the school.

Netizens outraged by MOE’s policy, deems it unfair and overreaching

On the petition, signatories shared their reasons for supporting this call. Many cited the unfairness of how they have to bear the high cost of these devices out of their own pockets yet will have to relinquish control to school.

Some described it as government overreach.

Others suggested that if the MOE wants to monitor students’ devices, the ministry should pay for it in full.

One person even pointed out that buying these devices from schools are much more expensive than purchasing directly from the store.

Other zeroed in on the issue of privacy and not wanting to give up their privacy. One netizen pointed out that there is a boundary between school and home that should not be crossed.

One person mentioned a student’s right to privacy as stipulated in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child which Singapore ratified back in 1995.

Others talked about how the DMA would make it much easier for hackers to gain access to multiple devices at a time by simply hacking the teacher’s device, which has remote access via the DMA to all their students’ devices.

 

One person brought up the previous cases of government sites and databases being hacked, resulting in massive data breaches.

One student from Ngee Ann Secondary School described how they have been using devices for learning for several years already and have coped well without the extra features that the MOE now wants to implement.

Continue Reading
9 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending