Connect with us

Current Affairs

MOM said to have apologised and admitted that their press release was inaccurate after former DJ Jade Rasif stands by her version of story on FDW’s quarantine orders

Published

on

Following the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) statement in regards to claims made by former DJ Jade Rasif on her foreign domestic worker (FDW)’s quarantine orders, the latter has come forward to stand by her version of the story.

In a Facebook post on Monday (17 May), MOM said that the social media personality’s account was “inaccurate” and her domestic helper has been “assessed to be free from current COVID infection and had not posed a risk to her employer’s family”.

The Indonesian national entered Singapore on 11 April, and was tested for COVID-19 upon arrival, MOM said.

It added that the foreign national was “tested negative on Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and positive on serology tests, and was assessed to have recovered from an old infection and antibodies against COVID-19”.

As such, she was deemed to be safe and permitted to be discharged from her Stay-Home Notice (SHN) on 13 April.

Following that, the Ministry of Health (MOH) and MOM decided to test the maid again due to the “worsening COVID-19 situation”, and found out that she tested positive on the PCR test, but there were “indications” pointing that this was from an old infection.

Ms Rasif had earlier said that she received a “major COVID-19 scare” after her domestic helper, who arrived from Indonesia, was sent back to Ms Rasif’s house after observing only three to four days of quarantine period at a quarantine centre.

This is despite Ms Rasif paying S$2500 for her to receive her full quarantine duration of 14 days. However, her domestic helper was asked to go for a sudden COVID-19 test a few days later and her test result came out positive. She then was sent back to a quarantine centre.

Replying to MOM’s statement, Ms Rasif said in the comment section that the dates furnished by the Ministry did not match the ones printed on the movement order that was issued, adding that she would be “happy to furnish” MOM with the details so it can make the corrections.

“Firstly, she did test positive, and served a 2 day SHN. Thank you for acknowledging this because a lot of people were accusing me,” she wrote.

In Ms Rasif’s initial post, she also said that she and her family were not ordered to be quarantine despite being in close contact with a COVID-19 positive case.

She went on to note that she was also being investigated by the police for breaching a quarantine order, which she claimed to have not received.

To this, MOM said in its Monday’s statement: “Ms Jade claimed to have been investigated for breach of quarantine. The family were not issued Quarantine Orders (QO), and there could not have been investigations made for breach of quarantine, when no QO was issued in the first place.”

Refuting this, Ms Rasif said that she did receive two calls from the police on breaching quarantine orders and will be “happy to state them for your internal investigations”.

“Thirdly, I have a letter that states the date you took her in. It was days before the 5th. I was only call on the 5th. Although I didn’t state this in my original post (I didn’t want to place any blame), I called MOM and other agencies on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th. I’ll be really happy to show you the quarantine order with the date she was taken in, if you care to reach out,” Ms Rasif noted.

She also expressed that it was “surprising” for the authorities to not include non-infectious cases as part of Singapore’s daily count of COVID-19 positive cases.

“Additionally, there are other families in my situation. They been placed on SHN. I hope you can reach out to me and provide this clear explanation to the affected parties,” Ms Rasif pointed out.

She concluded by asking MOM to reach out to her as she would love to assist the Ministry in its investigations.

MOM admits its mistake, said Ms Rasif

Providing an update on this, Ms Rasif wrote in an Instagram Story on Tuesday (18 May) that MOM has “apologised and admitted that their press release was inaccurate, and made without sufficient research”, after looking at the evidences presented by the former model.

She added, “I have extended the opportunity for us to re-release a joint statement to reveal the truth to the public.”

A FB user, Musa Kazim commented: “Admission of fault is the first step of correction. Their statement is giving the impression that you have not been unembellished in your accounts.”

To this, Ms Rasif wrote: “Well… it’s ok, I’m blessed I have the platform to defend myself. I’m just happy that what I said in substance was true.”


There is however, no update on MOM’s FB post on 17 May to reflect the error.

TOC has reached out to MOM to find out if it is going to release a new press statement highlighting the inaccuracies that it has made in regards to Ms Rasif’s story.

We have yet to receive a reply from the Ministry or any indication that it will reply to our queries.

Continue Reading
15 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending