Connect with us

Current Affairs

ST Forumer confident of “more blessings to come” to SGs while elderly struggles to retire

Published

on

Following the publishing of a Straits Times article from an American professor, praising Singapore’s achievements and telling Singaporeans not to complain, ST went further to publish a letter from a member of the public, Michael Lim, supporting the American’s view (‘Forum: Singaporeans have it good in many ways‘, 3 Aug).

Lim said that he has spent two decades away from Singapore, in Hong Kong, Vietnam, Taiwan and now Thailand. “I can attest to how fortunate and blessed we Singaporeans are in many different ways,” he said.

“I learnt that the poor in the other places I have lived in have it worse than the poor in Singapore, while the rich in these other places also fare better than the rich in Singapore in terms of comfort, influence and access.”

“This inequality has unfortunately shown up during the current pandemic in the differential access to vaccines in some of these places,” he added.

He agreed with the American professor that Singaporeans are indeed a complaining lot.

“But we should complain with humour, humility and reverence for the system that our forefathers built and our current generation upholds,” he said. “And as our nation celebrates its National Day, we surely must have the confidence that we have more blessings to come.”

More seniors having to work

It’s not known what kind of blessings Lim is expecting Singaporeans to have but certainly, with the large number of Singaporeans not having enough money in their Central Provident Fund (CPF) account for retirement, many will have to work till they perish from this world (‘400K Singaporeans between age 55 to 70 don’t have enough in CPF to meet Basic Retirement Sum‘, 23 Mar 2021).

It was reported in March this year that there are currently around 400,000 people aged 55 to 70 who don’t have enough in their CPF to meet the Basic Retirement Sum (BRS), which is intended to provide a lifelong basic monthly income of up to $800. Currently, for CPF members turning age 55 this year, the BRS which is half of the the Minimum Sum is set to $93,000 by the government as of 2021.

Indeed, without sufficient CPF savings, many have to continue to work even in their ripe old age. Just 3 months ago in May, it was reported that a cleaner who was infected with the coronavirus at Changi airport terminal is, in fact, an 88-year-old elderly working at the airport. Many netizens were asking why the elderly is still working especially at such a high-risk location with imported COVID-19 cases flying into Singapore everyday.

One netizen wrote, “This is really heartbreaking. Still working as a cleaner at 88. And yet they still want to happy happy open borders to high risk countries.” Another asked, “Where did we go wrong?”

And even with $800 a month assuming one is able to meet the BRS requirement, it may not be enough to see the person retiring comfortably in Singapore. According to a 2019 study conducted by LKY School of Public Policy and NTU, a single person aged 65 and above would need at least $1,379 a month to sustain a descent basic standard of living in Singapore.

In order to cope with rising living costs, an increasing number of elderly Singaporeans have resorted to making a return to the workforce at an age when many would like to retire comfortably.

It was reported in 2019 where Reuters reported that the employment rate for people over 65 in Singapore have jumped over 15 percent in the past decade.

“Some of them say they have to continue to work in order to survive”.

“Almost a third of Singaporeans over 65 work”, according to Reuters, adding that “the employment rate for the elderly has jumped over 15 percent”.

“Since 2016, the country has launched several schemes to help companies with older staff, such as redesign grants that subsidise pay.

“The government is hoping to help older workers remain in the workforce longer and stay productive members of society,” Reuters added.

Speaking to Reuters, Philip, a 71-year-old security officer at Alliance Française, said that “instead of enjoying retirement”, he works six days a week at the French cultural centre, during which he screens incoming visitors to ensure that no trespassing occurs.

Citing his reasons for working at such an age, Mr Philip said that his reasons “can be summed up in two letters: A and I.”

“A stands for active – being active; I: to be independent,” he beamed.

However, with a “sky high cost of living and one of the highest life expectancies worldwide”, many older workers in Singapore have few choices but to return to the workforce after retirement “because they simply cannot survive otherwise”, Reuters highlighted.

Younger Singaporeans involving in freelance work with no CPF

There have also been worries that many of the younger Singaporeans who are involved in freelance work in the gig economy nowadays, may have difficulties retiring when they get old.

This is because such freelance work does not guarantee a stable income for the long term and would impact their CPF savings. Others, including high-income earners, are worried about pay cuts and retrenchments in future, which would also impact their CPF savings and retirements.

Meanwhile, in Australia, a first world country which the writer Lim presumably did not work in, the retirement of elderly is well taken care of. A typical Australian who is single can get a pension amount of A$952.70 per 2 weeks, or about A$2,064 (S$2,144) per month.

In fact, most of the pension money would likely be spent off by the Australian pensioner, helping to drive its local economy since he or she knows they would be getting the money continuously every 2 weeks.

In Singapore, the government expects the children to fund the retirement of their elderly parents if they don’t have enough to retire. In fact, the Maintenance of Parents Act in Singapore even provides for an elderly aged 60 years old and above who is unable to subsist on his own, to sue his children so as to claim maintenance money from them.

 

Continue Reading
18 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending