Connect with us

Current Affairs

Civic space in Singapore is “obstructed”, gov’t uses restrictive laws to silence critics: CIVICUS

Published

on

The civic space in Singapore is “obstructed”, as rated by global civil society alliance CIVICUS. Its research tool, the CIVICUS Monitor, rates the conditions of civil society or civic spaces in countries across the world, providing ratings for 196 countries.

According to the alliance, the rating of “obstructed” is given to countries where civic spaces are “heavily contested by power holders who impose a combination of legal and practical constraints on the full enjoyment of fundamental rights”.

Though civil society organisations may exist in these countries, state authorities undermine them in myriad ways including the use of illegal surveillance, bureaucratic harassment and demeaning public statements.

CIVICUS notes that in countries where civic spaces are obstructed, citizens can organise and assemble peacefully but remain vulnerable to the use of excessive force; while journalists face the risk of physical attack and criminal defamation charges which encourages self-censorship.

On Monday (23 August), CIVICUS published an analysis of the civic space in Singapore in an article titled “Singapore PM listed as press freedom ‘predator’ as journalists continue to be targeted”.

The association pointed out that the government’s use of an array of “restrictive” laws to silence criticism was also raised by UN Human Rights Council in May 2021 during its review of Singapore’s human right’s records.

“Among the laws that states called to be revised or repealed include the Printing Presses Act, Protection from Online Falsehoods and Misinformation Act (POFMA), the Administration of Justice Act, the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act, the Public Order Act and the Penal Code,” noted CIVICUS.

The Singapore government is due to respond to these recommendations in September.

PM Lee on RSF list of press freedom violators, “predator”

In the article, CIVICUS goes on to refers to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s inclusion in the list of violators of press freedom by Reporters without Borders (RSF) in June 2021. This is in addition to the country being ranked 160th out of 180 on the 2021 World Press Freedom Index.

RSF defines ‘predators’ as heads of state who attack press freedom by pushing for censorship, arbitrarily imprisoning journalists or inciting violence against them.

CIVICUS highlighted the RSF’s remarks that PM Lee has pushed for censorship in Singapore and that he has “gagged the press” by using the Infocomm Media Development Authority to remove content or shut down media outlets.

RSF noted that this system leaves no room for press freedom.

Silencing critics and independent media

Diving into what Singapore’s obstructed civic space looks like, CIVICUS goes into detail about the various legal action taken against bloggers and the media, noting that PM Lee is “fond of suing bloggers he doesn’t like”.

The article writes: “He has an army of lawyers who sue them for astronomical sums, subjecting them to interminable legal proceedings with the aim of silencing them.”

“The country’s ‘anti-fake news’ law completes the country’s ‘repressive armoury’ as it provides the government the power to decide the truthfulness of a news story.”

The anti-fake news law refers, of course, to the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Misinformation Act which was passed in 2019.

The CIVICUS article goes on to discuss the criminal defamation case against The Online Citizen (TOC)’s editor-in-chief Terry Xu and writer Daniel Augustin De Costa over a letter published on the site in September 2018 which condemned government corruption.

The article noted: “Ending the use of legal action, such as criminal defamation which curtails freedom of expression, was one of the recommendations received by Singapore in its Universal Periodic Review.”

It also mentioned several other legal actions that Mr Xu is facing including the defamation case against him and a TOC writer in two separate actions by PM Lee over the same article published in 2019 which repeated allegations by the premier’s siblings regarding a family dispute; as well as contempt of court proceeding over a post about the legal system.

Beyond that, TOC has also been slapped with several correction orders under POFMA, most recently over its coverage of a story about how the police treated an elderly woman who wasn’t wearing a mask.

The story was based on a video that was initially posted by an Instagram user. The user, as well as another website, were issued correction orders as well.

TOC’s application to cancel the correction order was rejected by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

CIVICUS noted, “POFMA has been increasingly used against political parties and critical online media.”

In addition to POFMA, CIVICUS also noted the government’s use of the 2017 Administration of Justice (Protection) Act—“a vaguely worded contempt of court law—to prosecute human rights activists such as Jolovan Wham and human rights lawyer M Ravi over criticism of the courts.

Increased surveillance

Moving on, CIVICUS also noted the increase in surveillance across the island which it says “raises questions on the right to privacy.”

This is in reference to the announcement by Minister of Law and Home Affairs, Mr K Shanmugam that Singapore would double the number of surveillance cameras to more than 200,000 by 2030. On top of that, facial recognition to access services is due to be rolled out as well.

CIVICUS highlighted Singapore’s rank as the 11th most surveilled state in the world according to the 2019 findings by research firm Comparitech.

Use of Official Secrets Act

The article also mentioned the recent arrest of a public servant under the state’s Official Secrets Act (OSA) for allegedly leaking information about the country’s COVID-19 measures ahead of the official announcement.

The police had said that the offence is categorised as “wrongful communication of information” under the law.

CIVICUS pointed: “This is inconsistent with The Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information which state that no person may be punished on national security grounds for disclosure of information if the disclosure does not actually harm and is not likely to harm a legitimate national security interest.”

“Further, Singapore does not have a freedom of information law, despite ongoing calls for such legislation,” it added.

Solo protests denied by the police

Finally, the CIVICUS article discussed the issue of solo protests in Singapore being disallowed, including a recent case where a Twitter user said he was denied permission to protest outside the Australian High Commission. The protest was meant to be directed at the Australian Prime Minister who is due to visit Singapore.

In that case, the police said in a statement that it hadn’t received an application for a permit. In that same statement, the authorities also reminded the public that organising or participating in an assembly without a permit is a violation of the Public Order Act and that no permits will be provided for assemblies advocating for causes related to other countries.

Beyond that, CIVICUS pointed out that under the Public Order Act, even solo peaceful protests are considered assemblies.

It added that prominent activists such as Jolovan Wham and Seelan Palay have faced charges under this act for their solo protests.

Continue Reading
9 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Farewell to Dr Lee Wei Ling: Rain marks solemn tribute, echoing her father’s funeral

Dr Lee Wei Ling’s funeral was conducted on 12 October 2024, in Singapore, with family members leading the procession in the rain. In a heartfelt eulogy, her brother, Lee Hsien Yang, remembered her dedication to medicine and family. Dr Lee had requested a simple ceremony, with her ashes to be scattered at sea.

Published

on

Li Huanwu and Li Shaowu sending off their aunt, Dr Lee Wei Ling in the rain (Photo: Lianhe Zaobao/唐家鴻)

Dr Lee Wei Ling was farewelled on 12 October 2024, in a solemn funeral ceremony attended by close family members and friends.

The weather was marked by light rain, drawing comparisons to the conditions during her father, Lee Kuan Yew’s funeral in 2015.

Her nephews, Li Huanwu and Li Shaowu, led the procession, carrying Dr Lee’s portrait and walking side by side under the rain, symbolically reflecting the loss felt by her family.

In his emotional eulogy through a recorded video, her brother, Lee Hsien Yang, spoke of Dr Lee’s profound contributions to medicine and her unshakable devotion to family.

He described her as a remarkable individual whose life had left an indelible mark on those who knew her, as well as on Singapore’s medical community.

Expressing deep sorrow at her passing, Lee Hsien Yang reflected on their close bond and the immense loss he felt, having been unable to attend her final farewell.

He recalled his private goodbye to her in June 2022, a poignant moment that stayed with him during her last months.

Lee Hsien Yang also reiterated Dr Lee’s wish for a simple funeral, a reflection of her humility.

In accordance with her wishes, her body was cremated, and her ashes will be scattered at sea, symbolising her desire for a modest and unobtrusive departure from the world.

LHY acknowledged the efforts of his sons, Li Huanwu and Li Shaowu, for their role in managing their aunt’s care during his absence, thanking them for their dedication to her comfort in her final days.

During his eulogy for his sister, Lee Hsien Yang also conveyed a message from Dr Lee regarding the family’s long-standing issue surrounding their home at 38 Oxley Road.

Quoting from Dr Lee’s message, LHY said: “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo’s, unwavering and deeply felt wish was for their house at 38 Oxley Road, Singapore 238629, to be demolished upon the last parent’s death.”

Dr Lee had been a vocal advocate for ensuring that this wish was honoured since Lee Kuan Yew’s death in 2015.

Dr Lee and LHY had strongly supported their father’s wishes, while their elder brother, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, took a different stance. This disagreement led to a public and highly publicised rift within the family.

In her final message, Dr Lee reiterated: “Lee Kuan Yew had directed each of his three children to ensure that their parents’ wish for demolition be fulfilled. He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Dr Lee had maintained a private life, focusing on her medical career as a respected neurologist. She was known for her candid views, often unflinching in her advocacy for transparency and integrity.

Her professional accomplishments, combined with her strong commitment to her parents’ legacy, made her a significant figure in both Singapore’s medical community and public discourse.

Diagnosed in 2020 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), a rare neurodegenerative disorder, Dr Lee faced immense physical and emotional challenges in her final years.

The illness progressively affected her movement, speech, and ability to swallow.

Despite her health struggles, Dr Lee remained actively involved in public discussions, particularly on matters concerning her father’s legacy, until her condition worsened to the point where communication became difficult.

By March 2023, her brother LHY revealed that her condition had deteriorated significantly, and he feared he might not be able to see her again due to his own circumstances.

Even in her final months, Dr Lee maintained a close relationship with her immediate family, who cared for her during her illness.

Dr Lee’s funeral and cremation mark the end of a significant era for the Lee family and Singapore.

Her legacy as a dedicated neurologist and a firm advocate for her parents’ values will continue to resonate, even as the debates over the future of the Oxley Road property remain unresolved.

The rain that fell during her funeral, so reminiscent of her father’s final farewell, added a symbolic layer to this momentous chapter in Singapore’s history.

Continue Reading

Trending