Connect with us

Business

Apple to relocate at least 20% of iPhone production to India

Apple is urging its suppliers in India, responsible for the new iPhone 15 series, to manufacture over 15 million iPhones in 2023, a significant increase from the previous year. The tech giant aims to simultaneously produce iPhones in both India and China, aiming to reduce the production time gap between the two countries. This strategy aims to diversify Apple’s supply chain and reduce its dependence on China, driven by political and commercial considerations.

Published

on

INDIA: Apple is targeting to relocate at least 20% of its iPhone manufacturing from China to India as part of its strategy to reduce supply chain dependency on China for its iPhone production

Apple’s suppliers in India, which makes the new iPhone 15 series, are being asked to make over 15 million iPhones in India this year, more than double the goal a year ago, according to Nikkei Asia.

The tech giant tries to produce iPhones simultaneously in India and China.

It once took one year longer to produce a new iPhone in India than in China, but the gap was reduced to around a month in 2022. The target this year is to narrow that to less than ten days.

China has long served as the reliable supplier for Apple’s efficient production processes.

More than 80% of Apple’s key 188 suppliers maintain manufacturing facilities in China, establishing the country as a crucial hub for the company’s operations.

Meanwhile, China has accounted for more than 95% of global iPhone production since the mobile phone was launched in 2007.

However, the era of exclusive dependence on China is ending, both for political and commercial reasons.

GettyImage

Earlier in 2023, Apple reportedly told suppliers to prepare to build at least 20% of total iPhone annual production in India in the coming years. The proportion currently stands at less than 10%.

Apple wants to broaden and deepen production in India, where it is currently weighted more toward routine tasks like assembly. Rather than snapping together already finished components in India, Apple plans to make more intermediate parts, such as metal casings, in the country.

Most important of all, Apple wants to bring crucial new iPhone product development resources to India from China. That involves thousands of engineers and the establishment of numerous new laboratories.

The longtime Apple formula of “designed in California, assembled in China” has faced unprecedented challenges with the twin crises of the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing tensions between the U.S. and China. U.S.-China technology sector “decoupling” has seen U.S. sanctions against Chinese companies enforced since 2018. The resultant uncertainty has pressured the tech industry, including Apple, to diversify its manufacturing base to other countries.

Apple’s shift to India parallels U.S. diplomatic overtures to New Delhi, in which technology plays a key role. For example, when U.S. President Joe Biden met Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on June 22, they jointly announced building “an even stronger, diverse U.S.-India partnership.” A memorandum of understanding on semiconductor supply chain collaboration and critical mineral supply chains was also signed.

Politics are key to the current shifts

“We know that US-China relations are not that great and India-China relations are also not that great.

“Apple is hedging its geopolitical risks [by] creating parallel manufacturing units in other countries, including Vietnam and India,” said Prachir Singh, an India-based analyst with Counterpoint, a global market research company.

But Apple has its own reasons for seeking to reduce its dependence on Chinese supply chains. A top concern is unrest at Apple’s production hub of Zhengzhou in October, the result of a Covid-19 outbreak, according to Nikkei Asia.

Another factor favouring manufacturing investment in India is the crowding out of alternative destinations like Vietnam and Thailand, usually the first beachheads for tech manufacturers seeking to move production out of China.

In these countries, the costs of land, water and electricity have been rising recently, and supply chain companies must think twice about investing. India, with its huge population, relatively low wages, large land mass and good English skills, is an obvious alternative to consider.

Then there is India’s massive market. Deloitte, a financial consultancy, projects that India will have 1 billion smartphone users by 2026, making it the largest market after China.

India’s government sees access to this market as leverage to entice Apple to make more locally, improving the reputation of India’s manufacturing sector with the coveted “Apple supplier” accolade.

“India’s attractiveness includes its massive market, cheap labor and government incentives,” said Counterpoint’s Singh. “We recognise we will see a significant shift over here.”

But Apple’s India move is taking place against the backdrop of a complicated bargaining process, and New Delhi is taking steps to ensure Indian companies get lucrative roles in the process.

“India stands to benefit greatly from the US and other countries’ interests in de-risking from China, and shifting supply chains to other places,” said Lisa Curtis, director of the Indo-Pacific security programme at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) and a former US official.

Several people close to Apple’s decision-makers reportedly said the catalyst for its move toward India was the unrest in Zhengzhou, home to the company’s largest iPhone assembly hub and its most important single production site in the world.

In October, a Covid-19 outbreak at Foxconn plants there, and the quarantine measures that followed, sparked protests among workers.

Production was disrupted for more than a month at the most critical time of the year, the shopping season leading up to Christmas.

Protesters smashed windows, turned over police cars, and clashed with quarantine personnel in hazmat suits. Police in riot gear had to be called in to quell the disturbance.

The Zhengzhou incident made clear to Apple executives that the docile workforce and efficient plants they have counted on for two decades can no longer be guaranteed. Apple decided it would need to move more of the iPhone supply chain out of China, just as India was coming into view as the alternative.

In light of the supply chain turmoil, Foxconn reportedly quickly gathered a task force of roughly a dozen employees and sent them to India.

Apple also sent experienced staff who oversee device production. Both groups arrived in India last autumn in an effort to jump-start production there.

By January, progress in India had already exceeded expectations.

Apple CEO Tim Cook opened doors of the very first Apple physical retail store in Mumbai, India Mumbai, located at the Jio World Drive mall in the Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC)

In April, Tim Cook travelled to India to open Apple’s first two retail stores in Mumbai and Delhi in the same week. Cook’s presence showed that in addition to diversifying supply chains, Apple also wants better access to India’s immense market.

Moving manufacturing to India has also been a strategy adopted by China’s Xiaomi, Oppo, and Vivo in their efforts to lower costs and bypass the tariffs India applies to imported phones.

That was all part of the Make in India campaign introduced in 2014 by Modi to encourage more local manufacturing.

Apple reckons that by pursuing the same strategy, it will have better access to the market there, more goodwill from the government, and ultimately reduce its reliance on China.

While Samsung is now India’s smartphone market leader, Apple is poised to take a slice out of that. Runar Bjorhovde, an analyst at Canalys, said Apple ranks seventh in India by shipments, already a significant volume given the iPhone’s price is much higher than most of its peers.

“With the economy improving in India, and with more tech investment going into India, we will probably see a similar socioeconomic change there as we’ve seen in China over the last two to two and half decades.

“That could give these smartphone makers great growth catalysts if they have access to the market just like what they did in China in the past,” Bjorhovde said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Business

Taiwan’s FSC rejects CTBC Financial’s bid to acquire Shin Kong Financial, favoring Taishin’s merger plans

Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission rejected CTBC Financial’s tender offer to acquire Shin Kong Financial, raising concerns about its plan, while Taishin Financial moves closer to a merger with Shin Kong. Both companies have scheduled shareholder meetings for 9 October.

Published

on

On 16 September 2024, Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) rejected an application from CTBC Financial Holding Co. to launch a tender offer for Shin Kong Financial Holding Co., potentially clearing the path for Taishin Financial Holding Co. to proceed with its proposed merger with Shin Kong Financial.

Jean Chiu, vice chairperson of the FSC, stated at a press conference that CTBC Financial failed to provide a comprehensive implementation plan for the acquisition. CTBC had proposed acquiring between 10% and 51% of Shin Kong Financial’s shares initially, with plans to later fully integrate the company.

However, the FSC raised concerns over CTBC’s lack of detailed provisions on how it would manage various potential outcomes, particularly if it failed to secure full control of Shin Kong.

Additionally, the FSC highlighted gaps in CTBC’s understanding of the financial health of Shin Kong’s life insurance subsidiary, as well as a lack of firm commitments regarding raising the capital size of this subsidiary.

This uncertainty, combined with the method of payment proposed by CTBC—using a mix of cash and its own stock—raised concerns that the tender offer could negatively affect shareholders due to potential fluctuations in CTBC’s stock price during the transaction process.

CTBC’s proposal, announced on 20 August, included an offer of NT$4.09 (US$0.13) per share in cash and an exchange of 0.3132 CTBC shares for each Shin Kong share, amounting to NT$14.55 (US$0.46) per share. This bid was labeled by Taishin Financial as a hostile takeover attempt, as Shin Kong Financial’s board had not approved the offer.

In response, Taishin Financial, which has been vying for Shin Kong through a merger, revised its stock swap offer on 11 September.

The new offer included 0.672 Taishin shares plus 0.175 preferred shares for each Shin Kong share, translating to NT$14.18 per share—closer to CTBC’s offer. Taishin had earlier disclosed on 22 August its original plan to offer 0.6022 shares of its stock per Shin Kong share, which amounted to NT$11.32 (US$0.36).

Chiu emphasized that tender offers based on stock payments are rare in Taiwan, with only six cases since the 2002 revision of tender offer regulations.

She referenced Fubon Financial Holding’s acquisition of Jih Sun Financial in 2023, where cash was used instead of shares, to highlight how tender offers have traditionally been handled in the local market.

Chiu concluded by stating that although Taiwan’s financial market operates on free-market principles, takeovers should avoid disrupting market order and respect corporate stability.

Taishin Financial and Shin Kong Financial are set to hold a special general meeting on 9 October to secure shareholder approval for their merger plan, which will then require the FSC’s endorsement.

Continue Reading

Business

Times Bookstores to close after nearly four decades in Singapore

Times Bookstores will cease operations in Singapore after nearly four decades, with its final outlet at Cold Storage Jelita closing on 22 September 2024. The closure is seen as being attributed to high rents, low sales, and rising operational costs, reflecting challenges faced by physical bookstores in Singapore.

Published

on

Times Bookstores will end its operations in Singapore after nearly 40 years, as its last remaining outlet at Cold Storage Jelita on Holland Road is set to close on 22 September 2024.

In a farewell statement posted on Instagram on 16 September, the English book retailer, established in 1978, invited customers to visit the store one final time. “Our happily ever after has finally come,” the post read. “It is with both a heavy heart and a sense of fulfilment that we announce the closure of Times Bookstores.”

The closure of Times Bookstores has been anticipated for several years. The company, owned by regional consumer group Fraser and Neave Limited, closed its branches in Plaza Singapura and Waterway Point in February 2024.

The shutdowns triggered a discussion in Singapore’s literary community about how to better support bookstores.

Struggles Facing Book Retailers

Times Bookstores has been affected by increasing rent, low sales, and rising operational costs. The Covid-19 pandemic exacerbated its challenges, with the business quietly closing outlets at Marina Square and Paragon in 2021.

A key warning came in 2019 when the retailer closed its 8,000 sq ft Centrepoint branch, once one of Singapore’s largest bookstores.

These closures reflect a broader struggle for physical bookstores in Singapore. Rising rent, higher goods and services taxes (GST), and increasing printing costs have driven book prices up, making it difficult for traditional retailers to compete.

Popular bookstore also shut its Marine Parade outlet on 18 June 2023, citing similar reasons, while Books Kinokuniya closed its JEM branch on 9 May 2022 due to slow sales and rental costs.

Future of Singapore’s Bookstores

Following the closure of Times, few large bookstore chains remain in Singapore. Books Kinokuniya, the largest bookstore in Singapore, continues to operate its flagship store at Takashimaya Shopping Centre.

According to a spokesperson from Toshin Development Singapore, cited by the Straits Times, Kinokuniya remains a key tenant, though no specific renewal dates were disclosed. The spokesperson added that Kinokuniya continues to engage with the landlord regularly to appeal to patrons and remain in trend.

Although Times Bookstores will no longer have physical stores in Singapore, its book distribution business, which supplies books from international and local publishers to other retailers, continues to operate.

Continue Reading

Trending