Connect with us

Comments

Accusations by Leon Perera’s former driver in Mothership’s interview spark skepticism: Netizens question his motives

Former MP Leon Perera’s ex-driver, Frankie Wong, expressed frustration to Mothership in an interview, disputing Workers’ Party Secretary General Pritam Singh’s account of learning about the affair via WhatsApp. Wong claims he informed Singh through a call.

His allegations sparked a deluge of comments on Mothership’s Facebook post, with some questioning his motives, some criticized Wong for not respecting involved parties’ privacy and healing process.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Frankie Wong, the former driver for ex-Member of Parliament Leon Perera, was recently interviewed by local media outlet Mothership.

During the interview, Wong conveyed his frustration, expressing being “deeply angered” by the portrayal of Mr Pritam Singh, the Workers’ Party Secretary General’s account in Parliament of how he got tipped off of an affair between Perera and former WP member, Nicole Seah.

Wong stated that Mr Singh had indicated learning about Perera and Seah’s affair through WhatsApp during the parliamentary session.

However, Wong disputes this version of events, asserting that he had actually informed Singh about Perera and Seah’s affair through a phone call.

Contrary to this, it’s important to note that Mr Singh did not specifically mention in Parliament on 2 August that he had been informed about the affair by Wong via WhatsApp.

It was during a press conference on 19 July, Mr Singh mentioned that around late 2020 and early 2021, the driver informed him through WhatsApp about the allegations, claiming that Mr Perera and Ms Seah frequently met in hotels and restaurants and were seen holding hands.

However, Mr Singh did not state if it was a WhatsApp message or a call.

Wong uploaded a video on Reddit, accusing Mr Singh “lied in Parliament”

Prior to this, Wong had uploaded a video on Reddit, voicing his dissatisfaction with Singh’s statements in Parliament.

He claimed that Singh had “misrepresented” the situation and emphasized his attempt to assist Perera regarding the affair, leading him to contact Gerald Giam, WP Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC.

Wong stated that Giam had provided him with Singh’s contact number and advised him to call Singh directly.

“So I called Pritam, said “please help Leon,” then he said ok.”

“Then, yesterday (2 Aug) I saw him, telling a lie in Parliament, saying that I WhatsApp him, ” Wong expressed his displeasure, questioning why Mr Singh hadn’t contacted him for an interview at that time.

Pritam allegedly lied in Parliament? – New video from Leon ex-driver Mr Frankie Wong?
by u/Green_Pear2 in SingaporeRaw

Wong claims he obtained Mr Singh’s contact number from Gerald Giam

During an interview with Mothership on 6 August, Wong disclosed that Gerald Giam provided him with Singh’s contact number, following which he reached out to Singh directly.

Wong explained that during their conversation, he informed Singh about Perera and Seah’s affair and requested Singh’s assistance on Perera’s behalf.

Wong alleged that Singh did not say anything besides replying “okay” before he hung up.

Wong said his communication with Singh occurred over a phone call and not through WhatsApp.

However, he admitted to not having a precise recollection of when he contacted both Giam and Singh, and he lacked any records of these conversations.

A check on Wong’s WhatsApp conversation with Singh by the Mothership reporter, indicated that only one message was exchanged between Wong and Singh on 9 April this year.

Both Wong and Singh’s statements to the media suggest that Wong had supposedly informed Singh about Perera and Seah’s affair sometime between late 2020 and early 2021.

While Wong said he had not changed his phone since 2020, it is unclear if the conversation reflects the entire WhatsApp message history between him and Singh.

The WP Chief had already clarified earlier, both in a press conference last month and in Parliament again on 2 Aug, that WP made an assessment of the circumstances in which the driver came forward with the information.

However, at that time, there was no evidence or corroborative information to support the allegation.

Singh reiterated that had there been different or new evidence, such as corroborative information or another source confirming their affairs, the WP would have pursued a different course of action.

The covertly-taken short video that was taken convertly depicting an interaction between Perera and Seah, which led to both of their resignations and spurred the WP press conference on 19 July, was only made available to WP and the general public on 17 July.

Coincidentally, this was merely hours before the announcement of the resignations of former Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan Jin and People’s Action Party MP Cheng Li Hui due to their extramarital affair.

In an interview with AsiaOne, Wong denied any involvement in the video’s leak on social media, stating that he has no idea when the video was taken.

Scrutiny from online community

Interestingly, the publication of Wong’s allegations has ignited fervent discussions on Mothership’s Facebook post of the interview.

While some are puzzled by the former driver’s focus on the method of conveying Perera’s affair—whether through WhatsApp or a phone call—others are skeptical of Wong’s underlying motives.

Criticism has been directed at Wong, suggesting that if his true intention was to support his ex-employer, he should have shown respect for all parties involved and allowed them the necessary time to recover within their families.

One netizen raised suspicions about the true purpose behind Wong’s recent social media video and questioned whether it was primarily intended to sway public opinion against the WP and Singh rather than serving any other purpose.

Given that both individuals at the centre of the controversy have already resigned and the case has been concluded, the netizen suggested Wong stop these ongoing discussions for the sake of the affected families’ healing process.

One comment humorously inquired why Mothership seems to be more focused on reporting about Leon and Seah rather than continuing to cover Tan and Cheng.

Scrutiny on timing of Wong’s revelation

Concurrently, some individuals have expressed skepticism regarding the timing of Wong’s revelation. Since he lacks a record of the call, doubts arise about the authenticity of his claims.

A netizen mockingly remarked that Wong’s primary concern seemed to be whether Singh mentioned “WhatsApp” or “called”.

This observation was followed by the ironic admission that Wong has no documentation of these alleged calls.

Another netizen astutely pointed out that the message in the image of the phone only displayed a single tick, indicating that it hadn’t even been delivered.

“Even if it’s a screenshot, I also couldn’t believe because it can even be an unused number saved under the name of Pritam and tap send but the message will not be delivered.”

Meanwhile, a comment posed a question about Mothership’s responsibility to delve deeper into Wong’s allegations.

Additionally, the comment raised queries about the legitimacy of Wong’s name and whether local media outlet AsiaOne had sought an interview with him.

Notably, just a day before Singh’s announcement of Perera’s resignation from both Parliament and WP, Wong was featured under the pseudonym ‘Tan’ in an AsiaOne article.

He detailed several instances of ostensibly intimate interactions between Perera and Seah, which he claimed to have observed through the rear mirror during his decade-long service for Perera.

Why masked?

Certain individuals have raised a pertinent question: If Wong’s intention is genuinely to highlight the matter, then why did he opt to obscure his identity in the video?

Simultaneously, he consented to media interviews.

Give time and space for the person involved to heal

Doubts have emerged, with some netizens questioning Wong’s genuine intention to rekindle this matter.

They ponder why he chose to resurface the issue, considering that both parties involved have already resigned and are in need of time to find solace and mend familial ties.

In a similar vein, a netizen has voiced criticism about the perceived double standard within the local mainstream media’s coverage of the Leon Perera-Nicole Seah affair.

This sentiment stands in contrast to the earlier advice from Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who emphasized the importance of affording all individuals involved the essential time and space to find healing and reconciliation with their families and loved ones.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Comments

Netizens: 8World News anchor’s defence of Singapore’s success overlooked key domestic concerns

In a recent talk show, Zhang Haijie, a news anchor from 8World News, defended Singapore’s achievements and countered foreign criticisms about its governance. While highlighting the nation’s success, Ms Zhang’s defence of the status quo was criticised by netizens for overlooking pressing issues like the rising cost of living, job opportunities, and housing challenges faced by ordinary Singaporeans. Additionally, some questioned whether Singapore’s solutions could address similar problems in Western countries.

Published

on

In a recent talk show, Zhang Haijie (张海洁), a news anchor with Singapore’s state media 8World News, staunchly defended the country’s achievements while dismissing criticisms from abroad.

In the video published on 12 September, Ms Zhang highlighted the criticisms Singapore often faces from international human rights organizations and Western media, especially regarding the perceived lack of freedom in its governance.

She highlighted how Western countries view Singapore’s democracy as abundant but its freedom as limited, whereas from a Singaporean perspective, Western freedoms sometimes go too far, such as in the case of legal gun ownership in the U.S., which raises concerns about public safety.

Zhang pointed out that while Singapore is frequently criticised for its lack of free speech, authoritarianism, and harsh legal punishments like caning and fines, these critiques are often convenient narratives used to attack Singapore’s system.

She acknowledged that these perceptions are deeply ingrained but argued that Singapore’s success, both in terms of social stability and economic prosperity, speaks for itself.

“Singapore has its own way of defending democracy and freedom; Western-style democracy and freedom don’t apply to us, ” Ms Zhang said.

“As a tiny nation with nothing, we first have to survive before we can afford the luxury of pursuing freedom and democracy.”

In her talkshow, Ms Zhang highlighted a recent article by Graham Allison, a Harvard professor and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense, published in Foreign Policy magazine.

The article, titled “What the West Can Learn From Singapore” poses a thought-provoking question: while Americans and Britons highly value freedoms like speech, press, and assembly, would they be willing to accept some limitations on these rights in exchange for the high standards of governance that Singaporeans enjoy?

Ms Zhang further highlighted that Singapore’s success is not merely the result of authoritarian governance, but stems from the fact that “Lee Kuan Yew and his nation-building team made the right decisions, even when they were difficult to understand or unpopular, which ultimately propelled Singapore to its current heights.”

Zhang cited the 1992 ban on chewing gum as an example, explaining that it was implemented to reduce societal costs and prevent vandalism on public property.

Although Singapore faced criticism for this decision—especially during U.S. negotiations—it reflected the country’s bold and pragmatic approach, she added.

Ms Zhang said despite external mockery, Singaporeans now view the ban as a success, showing how restrictions can lead to better living conditions.

She also referenced Lee Kuan Yew’s comment to the BBC, acknowledging that Singapore has been labeled a “nanny state.”

However, she argued that this governance model has fostered a more disciplined and livable society over the years.

Zhang emphasised “Uniquely Singapore” governance system, which is tailored to its specific needs and environment, including policies like the Certificate of Entitlement (COE), government housing, ERP, and a strong anti-corruption framework.

Nevertheless, Ms Zhang acknowledged that while the Western governance model has its advantages, especially in inclusivity, Singapore’s tailored system has proven effective for its unique circumstances.

Netizens criticise Ms Zhang for overlooking Singaporeans’ pressing concerns, lack of balance discussion

8World News is a Chinese digital portal under Mediacorp, a state-owned media company under Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, Temasek Holdings.

Despite the supportive comments on 8World News’s YouTube channel and Facebook page reflecting Ms Zhang’s defence of Singapore’s democracy and achievements, some netizens have pointed out that her arguments overlooked criticisms and concerns raised by ordinary Singaporeans.

These concerns include pressing issues such as the rising cost of living, job opportunities, and housing challenges, which have been increasingly alarming for many on the ground.

A comment emphasised the importance of “press freedom” as a reflection of society, comparing it to the necessity of having a mirror in every household. He suggests that just as a mirror reflects one’s appearance, a free press reflects societal issues and concerns.

Netizen suggests 8World News seek diverse opinions on Singapore’s democracy

A YT user suggests that discussing the topic solely from one’s own perspective may not be suitable.

The user recommend that as an individual media platform, the best approach is to invite several guests to share their personal viewpoints, allowing the audience to draw their own conclusions based on a range of opinions.

Netizen asked: Can Singapore’s solutions solve problems in the Western world?

Another comment questions the assertion that Western-style democracy is not applicable to Singapore by highlighting that Singapore’s system is built on parliamentary democracy, elections, a fair judiciary, and a neutral civil service.

These elements, the netizen argues, are essential to Singapore’s success and are not exclusive to Western models.

The netizen further argued that Singapore’s economic prosperity is rooted in the post-war world order led by the U.S., which promoted free trade and provided technology and capital from the West.

He then questions whether Singapore’s model could be applied to the UK or the US, noting that these countries have long histories of stable governance while Singapore is still in its early stages of development.

“The crises faced by the US and European societies are reactions to globalization, such as issues with immigration and unemployment due to industrial shifts. How has Singapore addressed these problems? ”

“For immigration, it firmly denies long-term residency to foreign workers. For unemployment caused by industrial shifts, it opened two casinos and developed the tourism and service industries. Do you think these solutions could be applied to the West? Can they resolve the West’s issues?” The netizen asked.

Rising living costs and employment challenges highlighted amidst growing concerns in Singapore

In recent years, there has been growing concern over rising living costs in Singapore, with many experiencing increased hardships due to policies that have driven up everyday expenses.

Escalating grocery prices, million-dollar HDB flats, and COE premiums exceeding S$100k set records, reinforcing Singapore’s tag as one of the world’s most expensive cities, surpassing even New York.

Last year, Singapore’s Workers’ Party proposed a motion urging structural changes to alleviate financial burdens on citizens, calling for measures to reduce living costs.

However, the ruling party’s proposed modifications to the motion, which the WP strongly opposed, were seen as diminishing the government’s responsibility to address these issues.

On 17 September, The Labour Market Report for Q2 2024, released by Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower, revealed that all job growth was driven by non-resident workers, while resident employment declined by 600.

Time-related underemployment among residents rose to 2.2%. Of the retrenched residents, 55% found new jobs within six months, but 41.4% had to accept lower wages.

Only 32.2% of retrenched residents managed to secure jobs with similar or higher pay. Older workers, particularly those aged 50 to 59, faced the biggest challenges, with their re-employment rate dropping to 41.6%.

Non-resident workers continue to fill roles in sectors like Construction and Manufacturing, which struggle to attract local residents due to the physically demanding nature of these jobs and the rising cost of living.

Over half of Singaporeans polled consider relocating to Johor Bahru to escape high living costs

A recent survey by Singlife found that more than two in five Singaporeans believe they will never achieve financial freedom.

The poll, part of Singlife’s second Financial Freedom Index, reveals significant concerns about the financial future of Singaporeans and permanent residents.

According to the survey, 44% of respondents doubt they will ever reach financial freedom, citing major obstacles such as insufficient income (53%), unforeseen expenses (38%), job insecurity (32%), and debt repayment burdens (28%).

These factors have contributed to a drop in the overall Financial Freedom Index score, which fell from 60 in 2023 to 58 out of 100 in 2024.

As Singapore’s cost of living rises and concerns about retirement fund adequacy mount, an increasing number of residents are considering relocating to Malaysia, especially Johor Bahru (JB).

According to a recent poll by Answers.sg, which surveyed over 1,500 respondents, more than half expressed a willingness to move to JB to escape Singapore’s high living expenses.

Continue Reading

Comments

Tan Kiat How: Police called after resident ‘became aggressive’ at meet-the-people session

Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How shared on TikTok that police were called to his meet-the-people session (MPS) in Bedok on Monday (17 Sept) evening after a resident ‘became a little more aggressive’, reportedly over a job issue. While the PAP MP emphasized the efforts made to assist residents, some netizens questioned the volunteers’ handling of the situation and urged more proactive measures from the MP.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Police were called to a meet-the-people session (MPS) in Bedok after a resident became aggressive, causing a disturbance, according to Member of Parliament (MP) for East Coast GRC Tan Kiat How.

Mr Tan, who represents the Kampong Chai Chee ward, addressed the incident in a TikTok video posted on Monday (17 September).

In the video, Mr Tan, who is also Senior Minister of State for National Development, emphasised the need for mutual respect at these sessions, which are intended to be safe spaces for both residents and volunteers.

“It was unfortunate that the police had to be called to MPS today when a resident became a little more aggressive,” Mr Tan said, acknowledging the incident that occurred during the Monday MPS session at Block 408 Bedok North Avenue 2.

Mr Tan expressed empathy for the challenges faced by residents but urged individuals attending MPS to remain respectful towards volunteers.

“Sometimes you see such cases at MPS, where one of the residents get more aggressive and can be a little bit more violent,” he noted.

He added that while efforts are made to assist residents, certain matters are beyond their control.

“For example, we can’t write to a government agency to demand the agency to offer a job to a person … but we can facilitate and make sure that opportunities are available for our residents,” he explained.

@tankiathow

It was unfortunate that the police had to be called to #MPS today when a resident became a little more aggressive. We always do our best to help #KampongChaiChee residents, but some things are beyond our control. Let’s work towards mutual respect and ensure MPS remains a safe space for both residents and volunteers. #caringeastcoast

♬ Future – Official Sound Studio

Netizens Question Volunteers’ Handling of Situation and Call for Greater Action from MP

The incident drew numerous responses on TikTok, with some expressing support for Mr Tan and others sympathising with the unnamed resident.

One comment suggested that the individual may have been “desperate” for a solution to their issue, while another urged patience, noting that not all cases can be resolved immediately.

Separately, Mr Tan responded to one user by confirming that he had previously helped the resident’s parents.

Some questioned whether the issue arose from a lack of tact by certain volunteers in handling the situation, suggesting that they receive proper training to address residents’ concerns effectively.

In response, Mr Tan emphasized that his volunteers always do their best and that empathy is crucial in such situations.

Another user noted that empathy should be mutual, suggesting that while residents are trying their best, they may feel they have no other solutions, urging Mr Tan to show greater understanding.

One comment pointed out that something significant might have affected the resident, possibly leading them to drastic actions, and called for more proactive measures from the MP rather than just expressing empathy.

This is not the first time an MPS has been marked by aggression.

In 2018, Jurong GRC MP Tan Wu Meng was assaulted by a 32-year-old man, leaving him with injuries.

The assailant was arrested after rushing into the MPS area and attacking Dr Tan.

Similarly, in 2009, Ang Mo Kio GRC MP Seng Han Thong was attacked when a resident doused him with paint thinner and set him on fire. Mr Seng survived but required extensive medical treatment.

Continue Reading

Trending