Connect with us

Politics

PM Lee claims Singapore has enough reserves “for most circumstances” while refusing to reveal the figures

In an exclusive interview with CNA, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong noted Singapore’s ample reserves for “most circumstances.”

However, he avoided disclosing exact figures when queried.

Additionally, PM Lee discussed the distinctive role of the Elected President as a “second key,” rooted in the nation’s history and politics.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Not only are four Presidential hopefuls contesting their ability to safeguard Singapore’s reserves, but Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong also expressed his concerns about the ongoing efforts to build and maintain these reserves during a recent interview.

During an exclusive interview with Singapore media outlet CNA, PM Lee highlighted that Singapore currently possesses reserves deemed sufficient for “most circumstances.”

However, he emphasized that it would be a “significant misconception” to assume this state will persist, given that the nation’s spending requirements are already surpassing the rate of revenue growth.

PM Lee stressed that the fourth-generation (4G) political leadership of the People’s Action Party (PAP) acknowledges the escalating spending demands and the necessity for Singapore to address them in a sustainable manner.

He characterized these reserves as a “great source of comfort and reassurance,” affording Singapore an additional strategy should challenging situations arise.

PM Lee’s response evades details of reserves

Yet, when asked about specific figures pertaining to Singapore’s reserves, PM Lee declined to provide a direct response.

Mr Lee said: “I can’t answer that question. It’s enough for most circumstances. It’s enough to give us a substantial support in the Budget every year contributing to the government’s revenues.”

With the People’s Action Party (PAP) governing the city-state for more than half a century, the disclosure of the reserves’ complete size has been reserved, citing reasons such as safeguarding national interests and averting speculative pressures on the Singapore dollar.

In 2009, Singapore initially accessed its reserves, withdrawing S$4.9 billion (equivalent to US$3.6 billion) to support the economy during the global financial crisis. Subsequently, during the COVID-19 pandemic between 2020 and 2022, the nation tapped into its reserves on three separate occasions, utilizing a total of S$40 billion.

PM Lee: Elected President established as ‘second key’ to look after our reserves

Interestingly, in the interview, PM Lee shed light on Singapore’s unique approach to the Elected President role, likening it to a “second key,” an innovation born from the nation’s historical journey of reserve accumulation and the strategic evolution of its political framework.

He expounded on the intricacies of this concept, explaining that this distinctive development, which he noted “can’t be replicated elsewhere,” emerged due to the specific circumstances of Singapore’s history.

The deliberate creation of an Elected President, dedicated to safeguarding reserves, was a response to the establishment of Temasek in 1974 and the subsequent formation of GIC in 1981.

In the 1980s, as the nation’s reserves swelled, discussions surrounding the elected presidency and its role as the “second key” gained traction, culminating in its implementation around 1990.

PM Lee recalled that the concept of the Elected President as a “second key” was initially introduced by late Lee Kuan Yew during his 1984 National Day rally.

Over the subsequent years, intensive efforts were undertaken by the government, leading to the publication of a pivotal White Paper in 1988 and the subsequent legislative amendments that laid the foundation for the elected presidency.

PM Lee emphasized his active involvement in the process, collaborating closely with Professor Jayakumar, “he made the drafts, I gave him inputs, I helped redraft, clarify, present differently come up with ideas, try to understand what the problem was, and how to pin down so that you protect the reserves but you don’t paralyze the government of the day.”

“because it’s very easy to lock it all up then you’re not allowed to do anything with it. well you can do that but then it becomes useless to you so what is the mechanism by which you can protect it lock it And yet when you need to unlock it and without the risk that all of it will disappear.”

“I think that was the key turning point, because it crystallized people’s focus, they knew that there’s such a thing called the reserves, that there’s quite a lot of money, and that it needs to be protected.”

PM Lee said since then the Singapore government made many adjustments refinements modifications to the arrangements for the elected president for the second key, but that fundamental turning point was the decision to crystallize the idea and to implement such a system.

“Any other country can just click their fingers and do (tap on their reserves), but we’ve got it (the ‘second key’), and I’m glad we are here, ” he said.

PM Lee has no idea “how much is enough” for the country’s reserves

Reflecting on the past, Mr. Lee shared, “Fortunately, we had the resources and we could do it, It’s a great blessing.”

However, he underscored a significant misconception that can arise among Singaporeans regarding the reserves – the belief in a definitive notion of “enough.”

“How much is enough? If I have more than that, I can spend it. If I have less than that, well, maybe I hope we get there,” he said. “I don’t know how much is enough.”

“Before the global financial crisis, we didn’t think we will need anything. When (it) came, it turned out we needed S$4, S$5 billion. When the COVID-19 crisis came, in the end we needed S$40 plus billion. So you have no idea how much you will need.”

Expressing caution, he cautioned that COVID-19 is not the most severe adversity Singapore could face. As such, he advocated a different perspective regarding the reserves – envisioning them as a form of “rainy day money,” designed to address unforeseen challenges more effectively.

PM Lee on NRIC, Temasek and GIC

Prime Minister Lee highlighted that the Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC) is the largest revenue source for the government, constituting around 20% of annual revenue.

The NIRC, allowing up to 50% spending of net investment returns from key entities like GIC and Temasek, contributes about 3.5% of GDP, surpassing other taxes.

This sustainable and balanced approach aligns with the government’s reinvestment strategy for future generations.

“It’s an important contribution. I think it’s a sustainable contribution and it’s also a fair contribution because the way we make the formula – half of the investment returns can be spent, the other half goes back and it is reinvested for the future,” said the Prime Minister.

“I think that we are pursuing the right policy and getting the right results. So when people say why don’t we use the reserves in order to benefit the current generation? The answer is we are to a very big degree, but you may not realise because we’ve gotten used to it.”

Prime Minister Lee discussed the roles of the three entities responsible for managing Singapore’s reserves.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) handles official foreign reserves, while Temasek Holdings, established in 1974, manages national companies commercially, including Singapore Airlines and DBS Bank.

GIC, founded in 1981, focuses on longer-term investments for higher returns.

Duty of political leaders to  “shield” the reserve managers from political and public pressures

Due to the substantial reserves, discussions about the possibility of establishing two competing GICs have arisen periodically.

Despite this, PM Lee noted that the complexity of establishing a single successful team is challenging enough, prompting a focus on enhancing its performance.

He also reaffirmed that the government maintains its non-interference stance in investment decisions by these entities.

He stressed the duty of political leaders to  “shield” and insulate the reserve managers from political and public pressures, ensuring their effective performance in their roles.

DBS CEO urged the Singapore government to deploy its massive reserves to bolster regional presence

In a contrasting perspective, Piyush Gupta, CEO of DBS Group Holdings Ltd., presented an alternative stance on Singapore’s reserves to the PAP government on Monday (14 Aug).

Historically, the PAP government has been cautious about utilizing these extensive reserves, especially concerning welfare disbursements.

However, Piyush Gupta emphasized the need for Singapore to utilize its vast reserves and enhance its regional investments.

He indicated that Singapore has not entirely recognized its standing as a prosperous country. He highlighted the importance of tapping into the city-state’s significant capital resources to gain a competitive advantage.

Gupta proposed that the administration should contemplate deploying these reserves to address societal issues, expand Singapore’s foothold in new sectors, and cultivate stronger relationships with neighboring nations.

Drawing a parallel with Japan’s sustained investment strategy in regional countries, Gupta suggested that Singapore could adopt a similar approach to reshape current perceptions. “Our neighbors perceive us as a self-centered nation,” he remarked.

Mr Gupta made the above remark at the “Reinventing Destiny” conference on Monday which commemorated the 100th birth anniversary of the late founding prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew.

Having led DBS for over ten years, Gupta is no stranger to expressing opinions on pressing economic issues. He has, in the past, touched upon the possibility of increasing taxes on Singapore’s affluent segment and has praised China’s drive towards shared prosperity.

Despite PM Lee’s insistence that the reserves cannot be revealed, the Singapore Government had previously disclosed a total of S$1.4 trillion in financial assets in the Government Financial Statements Report for the financial year ending 31 March 2021.

This report, published by the Ministry of Finance. The reserve, over a trillion, was referenced by Gupta in his address.

When questioned in Parliament by Mr Leong Mun Wai, a Non-Constituency Member from the Progress Singapore Party over whether the data released is correct, the Second Minister for Finance, Ms Indranee Rajah, refrained from directly confirming the figure.

She instead inquired about the source of the data, saying, “if the data is already available to the public, then I don’t need to confirm it.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Comments

Redditors question support for PAP over perceived arrogance and authoritarian attitude

Despite Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s warning that slimmer electoral margins would limit the government’s political space “to do the right things”, many Redditors questioned their support for the ruling PAP, criticising its perceived arrogance. They argued that SM Lee’s remarks show the party has ‘lost its ways’ and acts as if it alone can determine what is right. Others noted that the PAP’s supermajority allows for the passage of unfavourable policies without adequate scrutiny.

Published

on

In a recent speech, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong warned that “if electoral margins get slimmer, the government will have less political space to do the right things.”

Mr Lee, who served as Prime Minister for 20 years, highlighted the risks associated with increasingly competitive politics.

“It will become harder to disregard short-term considerations in decision-making. The political dynamics will become very different,” he stated during his speech at the Annual Public Service Leadership Ceremony 2024 on 17 September.

“Singaporeans must understand the dangers this creates, and so must the public service,” SM Lee stressed.

SM Lee pointed out that Singapore faces formidable internal and external challenges in the years ahead, with rising expectations and demands from citizens.

As growth becomes harder to achieve and politics becomes more fiercely contested, he warned, “Things can go wrong for Singapore too.”

He urged vigilance in preparing for an uncertain future, noting, “As the world changes, and as the generations change, we must do our best to renew our system – to ensure that it continues to work well for us, even as things change.”

Critique of PAP’s Arrogance and Disconnect from Singaporeans

The People’s Action Party (PAP) experienced a notable decline in its vote share during the 2020 General Election, securing 61.24% of the votes and winning 83 out of 93 seats, a drop from 69.9% in 2015.

A significant loss was in Sengkang GRC, where the PAP team, led by former Minister Ng Chee Meng, was defeated by the Workers’ Party (WP).

In discussions on Reddit, some users questioned why they should support the ruling PAP, criticising the party’s perceived arrogance.

They pointed out that SM Lee’s recent remarks illustrate that the party has strayed from effectively serving Singaporeans and seems to believe it has the sole authority to decide what is right.

Others highlighted that the PAP’s super-majority in Parliament enables the passage of unfavourable policies without sufficient scrutiny.

One comment acknowledged that while many older Singaporeans remain loyal to the PAP due to its past achievements, younger generations feel the party has failed to deliver similar results.

There is significant frustration that essentials like housing and the cost of living have become less affordable compared to previous generations.

The comment emphasised the importance of the 2011 election results, which they believe compelled the PAP to reassess its policies, especially concerning foreign labor and job security.

He suggested that to retain voter support, the PAP must continue to ensure a good material standard of living.

“Then, I ask you, vote PAP for what? They deserve to lose a supermajority. Or else why would they continue to deliver the same promises they delivered to our parents? What else would get a bunch of clueless bureaucrats to recognise their problems?”

Emphasising Government Accountability to the Public

Another Redditor argued that it is the government’s responsibility to be accountable to the people.

He further challenged SM Lee’s assertion about having less political space to do the right things, questioning his authority to define what is “right” for Singapore.

The comment criticised initiatives like the Founder’s Memorial and the NS Square, suggesting they may serve to boost the egos of a few rather than benefit the broader population. The Redditor also questioned the justification for GST hikes amid rising living costs.

“Policies should always be enacted to the benefit of the people, and it should always be the people who decide what is the best course of action for our country. No one should decide that other than us.”

The comment called for an end to narratives that present the PAP as the only party capable of rescuing Singapore from crises, stating that the country has moved past the existential challenges of its founding era and that innovative ideas can come from beyond a single political party.

Another comment echoed this sentiment, noting that by stating this, SM Lee seemingly expects Singaporeans to accept the PAP’s assumption that they—and by extension, the government and public service—will generally do the “right things.”

“What is conveniently overlooked is that the point of having elections is to have us examine for ourselves if we accept that very premise, and vote accordingly.”

A comment further argued that simply losing a supermajority does not equate to a lack of political space for the government to make the right decisions.

The Redditor express frustration with SM Lee’s rhetoric, suggesting that he is manipulating public perception to justify arbitrary changes to the constitution.

Concerns Over PAP’s Supermajority in Parliament

Another comment pointed out that the PAP’s supermajority in Parliament enables the passage of questionable and controversial policies, bypassing robust debate and discussion.

The comment highlighted the contentious constitutional amendments made in late 2016, which reserved the elected presidency for candidates from a specific racial group if no president from that group had served in the previous five terms.

A comment highlighted the contrast: in the past, the PAP enjoyed a wide electoral margin because citizens believed they governed effectively. Now, the PAP claims that without a substantial electoral margin, they cannot govern well.

Continue Reading

Comments

Tan Kiat How: Police called after resident ‘became aggressive’ at meet-the-people session

Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How shared on TikTok that police were called to his meet-the-people session (MPS) in Bedok on Monday (17 Sept) evening after a resident ‘became a little more aggressive’, reportedly over a job issue. While the PAP MP emphasized the efforts made to assist residents, some netizens questioned the volunteers’ handling of the situation and urged more proactive measures from the MP.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Police were called to a meet-the-people session (MPS) in Bedok after a resident became aggressive, causing a disturbance, according to Member of Parliament (MP) for East Coast GRC Tan Kiat How.

Mr Tan, who represents the Kampong Chai Chee ward, addressed the incident in a TikTok video posted on Monday (17 September).

In the video, Mr Tan, who is also Senior Minister of State for National Development, emphasised the need for mutual respect at these sessions, which are intended to be safe spaces for both residents and volunteers.

“It was unfortunate that the police had to be called to MPS today when a resident became a little more aggressive,” Mr Tan said, acknowledging the incident that occurred during the Monday MPS session at Block 408 Bedok North Avenue 2.

Mr Tan expressed empathy for the challenges faced by residents but urged individuals attending MPS to remain respectful towards volunteers.

“Sometimes you see such cases at MPS, where one of the residents get more aggressive and can be a little bit more violent,” he noted.

He added that while efforts are made to assist residents, certain matters are beyond their control.

“For example, we can’t write to a government agency to demand the agency to offer a job to a person … but we can facilitate and make sure that opportunities are available for our residents,” he explained.

@tankiathow

It was unfortunate that the police had to be called to #MPS today when a resident became a little more aggressive. We always do our best to help #KampongChaiChee residents, but some things are beyond our control. Let’s work towards mutual respect and ensure MPS remains a safe space for both residents and volunteers. #caringeastcoast

♬ Future – Official Sound Studio

Netizens Question Volunteers’ Handling of Situation and Call for Greater Action from MP

The incident drew numerous responses on TikTok, with some expressing support for Mr Tan and others sympathising with the unnamed resident.

One comment suggested that the individual may have been “desperate” for a solution to their issue, while another urged patience, noting that not all cases can be resolved immediately.

Separately, Mr Tan responded to one user by confirming that he had previously helped the resident’s parents.

Some questioned whether the issue arose from a lack of tact by certain volunteers in handling the situation, suggesting that they receive proper training to address residents’ concerns effectively.

In response, Mr Tan emphasized that his volunteers always do their best and that empathy is crucial in such situations.

Another user noted that empathy should be mutual, suggesting that while residents are trying their best, they may feel they have no other solutions, urging Mr Tan to show greater understanding.

One comment pointed out that something significant might have affected the resident, possibly leading them to drastic actions, and called for more proactive measures from the MP rather than just expressing empathy.

This is not the first time an MPS has been marked by aggression.

In 2018, Jurong GRC MP Tan Wu Meng was assaulted by a 32-year-old man, leaving him with injuries.

The assailant was arrested after rushing into the MPS area and attacking Dr Tan.

Similarly, in 2009, Ang Mo Kio GRC MP Seng Han Thong was attacked when a resident doused him with paint thinner and set him on fire. Mr Seng survived but required extensive medical treatment.

Continue Reading

Trending